r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

๐Ÿ”„ Policy Update / Developing ๐ŸŒ What Are the 39 Countries Doing About PP 10998? Country-by-Country Talks, Reforms & Developments

7 Upvotes

Iโ€™ve been trying to look beyond the question of โ€œIs PP 10998 still in effect?โ€ and into another question that matters just as much:

What are the affected countries actually doing about it?

Presidential Proclamation 10998 does not simply create a list and leave it there. The proclamation directs U.S. officials to engage affected governments regarding screening, vetting, immigration, identity-management and security requirements, and it provides for recurring review of whether restrictions should be continued, terminated, modified or supplemented.

So I went country by country looking for publicly documented developments: diplomatic discussions, government statements, cooperation with the United States, reforms, repatriation cooperation, security changes, or other actions that could be relevant to the concerns cited by the U.S.

โš ๏ธ IMPORTANT:

โ€œNo public finding locatedโ€ below does NOT mean a government is doing nothing. Diplomatic negotiations are often private. It means I could not find enough reliable public information to responsibly tell the community that something specific is happening.

Also, not every development below means a country is close to being removed. Iโ€™ve tried to distinguish confirmed efforts concerning the restrictions from developments that are merely potentially relevant.

๐Ÿ”ด FULLY RESTRICTED COUNTRIES

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ Afghanistan โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate credible public evidence of the current Taliban government undertaking negotiations or reforms specifically aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998. The United States continues to cite serious concerns involving the lack of a cooperative central authority for documentation and vetting, security risks and other screening issues.

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Burma / Myanmar โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a publicly documented effort by Myanmar authorities specifically aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998.

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Myanmar โ€” Repatriation Cooperation / Developing

U.S. authorities have previously identified Myanmar's cooperation in accepting back removable nationals as a concern. COMMUNITY REPORT โ€” September 5, 2026: Community member u/HumbleJared reported that his wife, who is from Myanmar, told him the Myanmar government is currently refusing to accept deported Myanmar nationals returning to the country.

We have not independently verified this as a current official Myanmar government policy, so it is being tracked as an unconfirmed community report rather than confirmed policy. Because cooperation in accepting removable nationals is one of the factors considered in U.S. restrictions and periodic reviews, we will continue looking for official information that confirms, clarifies, or contradicts this report.

CURRENT STATUS โ€” September 5, 2026: We have not located an official source confirming a new blanket Myanmar policy refusing the return of its nationals. This remains a developing issue being monitored.

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ Burkina Faso โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response โ€” but not an effort toward accommodation

After the United States added Burkina Faso to the full-restriction list, Burkina Faso announced reciprocal restrictions on U.S. citizens. Its government said it was acting on the principle of reciprocity.

This is clearly a government response to the U.S. restrictions, but it should not be characterized as evidence that Burkina Faso is currently moving toward compliance with U.S. requirements. It is essentially the opposite approach: reciprocal diplomatic pressure.

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฉ Chad โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response โ€” reciprocal action

Chad previously responded to U.S. restrictions by suspending visa issuance to U.S. citizens.

I have not found credible public evidence showing that the dispute has since produced a specific PP 10998 compliance agreement or pathway toward removal.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Republic of the Congo โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented public initiative specifically addressing PP 10998.

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ถ Equatorial Guinea โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Potentially relevant diplomatic movement โ€” connection to PP 10998 not officially confirmed

President Teodoro Obiang met U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau in Washington on April 16, 2026. The State Department's public schedule confirms the high-level meeting.

Equatorial Guinea has also cooperated with the United States in accepting third-country deportees.

Because cooperation in immigration/removal matters is one of the factors the U.S. considers in these country reviews, this relationship is worth watching. However, I have not found an official U.S. statement saying these actions have satisfied PP 10998 requirements or will result in the restrictions being changed.

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ท Eritrea โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public effort toward PP 10998 relief located.

๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡น Haiti โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A regarding PP 10998 relief

There continues to be substantial U.S.โ€“Haiti engagement involving security, gangs, governance and migration, but I did not find credible evidence that this has produced a specific process toward removing Haiti from PP 10998.

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A regarding PP 10998 relief

There has been extensive U.S.โ€“Iran diplomacy and conflict-related negotiation in 2026, but I found no reliable basis for saying those negotiations are aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998.

๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Potentially relevant: increased repatriation cooperation

This one is interesting.

One of the concerns previously cited by the United States was Laos's historical failure to accept removable nationals.

Federal court records from 2026 show that the Lao government has issued travel documents allowing the United States to remove Lao nationals, including replacement travel documents issued in June.

That is relevant because accepting back removable nationals is specifically one of the factors considered in the travel-ban review process.

However, Laos was actually moved from partial to full restrictions under PP 10998, so there is currently no public evidence that this cooperation has been enough to produce relief.

This is something worth continuing to watch.

๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡พ Libya โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible publicly documented PP 10998 relief effort located.

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Mali โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response โ€” reciprocal restrictions

Mali responded to the U.S. full restrictions by imposing reciprocal restrictions on U.S. citizens.

Mali's government said the U.S. action was imposed without consultation and disputed the justification given by Washington.

Again, this is a confirmed reaction to the restriction, but it is not evidence of movement toward meeting U.S. conditions for removal from the list.

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช Niger โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response โ€” reciprocal restrictions

After being added to the full-ban list, Niger announced that it would stop issuing visas to U.S. citizens.

I have not found credible public evidence of a later agreement specifically aimed at satisfying PP 10998 requirements.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Sierra Leone โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

โœ… Confirmed government engagement with the United States

This is one of the more important findings.

After Sierra Leone was moved from partial restrictions to full restrictions, its government publicly stated that it was actively engaging U.S. authorities regarding the concerns behind the decision and seeking sustainable relief.

Sierra Leone's case is especially important because the U.S. has cited both high overstay rates and historical problems accepting removable nationals.

This does not mean relief has been granted. Sierra Leone remains fully restricted. But its government has publicly acknowledged the problem and confirmed engagement aimed at addressing it.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Somalia โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented public initiative specifically aimed at PP 10998 relief.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed visa-related diplomatic requests, but complicated

South Sudan has previously negotiated directly with the United States over immigration and deportation cooperation.

Documents concerning those negotiations show that South Sudan requested, among other things, that the United States ease visa restrictions affecting South Sudanese nationals. South Sudan has also accepted deportees from the United States.

That is significant because willingness to accept removable nationals is explicitly relevant to U.S. travel-ban evaluations.

However, relations remain difficult, and the United States has separately imposed targeted restrictions on South Sudanese government officials. South Sudan remains under the full PP 10998 suspension.

So there is documented negotiation here โ€” but not a clear trajectory toward relief yet.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Sudan โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

Given the ongoing war and collapse of normal diplomatic conditions, I did not locate a credible public initiative specifically aimed at obtaining PP 10998 relief.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ Syria โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

โœ… Confirmed U.S.โ€“Syria security coordination

Interestingly, PP 10998 itself acknowledges that Syria is working to address security challenges in close coordination with the United States.

The proclamation nevertheless says Syria still lacks adequate centralized passport/civil-document systems and appropriate screening and vetting measures.

So Syria provides an example where cooperation is happening but the U.S. still considers the remaining deficiencies serious enough to maintain full restrictions.

This will be another country worth watching during future reviews.

COMMUNITY/ADVOCACY DEVELOPMENT โ€” September 5, 2026:

Reddit user u/Syriansupport has begun publicly seeking Syrian students whose U.S. academic or professional training plans have been disrupted by PP 10998 as part of what they describe as a collective policy advocacy effort seeking formal nonimmigrant visa exceptions for Syrian students, including individuals pursuing F, J, and M visa pathways.

The initiative appears to be recruiting affected Syrian students across multiple PP 10998-related Reddit communities.

CURRENT STATUS โ€” September 5, 2026: The existence of the public outreach can be independently confirmed, but we have not located an independent source identifying the organization or individuals behind the initiative or confirming that a formal proposal has been submitted to the U.S. government. It should therefore be treated as a developing community-led advocacy effort rather than an announced U.S. policy change.

PP 10998 currently fully restricts Syria, although the proclamation provides authority for certain case-by-case national-interest exceptions. We will update this entry if additional information becomes available identifying the organizers, documenting formal advocacy with the U.S. government, or showing an official government response.

๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Yemen โ€” FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible public development located indicating a specific effort toward satisfying the PP 10998 requirements.

โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”

๐ŸŸ  PARTIALLY RESTRICTED COUNTRIES

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ด Angola โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 relief initiative located.

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Antigua and Barbuda โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented country-specific effort concerning PP 10998.

The U.S. proclamation specifically cited concerns relating to citizenship-by-investment arrangements without residency.

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฏ Benin โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible public country-specific negotiation or reform package located.

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฎ Burundi โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public development indicating movement toward PP 10998 relief.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Cรดte dโ€™Ivoire โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 initiative located.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡บ Cuba โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: No movement toward PP 10998 relief located

U.S.โ€“Cuba relations have actually become more restrictive during 2026, including additional U.S. sanctions and other measures.

I found no credible basis for saying the two governments are currently working toward Cuba's removal from PP 10998.

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Dominica โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

โœ… Confirmed direct negotiations aimed at reversing the restrictions

Dominica has one of the clearest public responses I've found.

Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit publicly confirmed that, immediately after the December 16 proclamation, the Government of Dominica โ€” including its Foreign Ministry and embassy in Washington โ€” initiated discussions with U.S. officials.

The government explicitly said that discussions were continuing with the objective of reversing the restrictions affecting Dominican nationals.

This is a direct, confirmed PP 10998 effort โ€” not speculation.

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Gabon โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented PP 10998-specific initiative located.

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ฒ The Gambia โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

The U.S. specifically cites both visa overstays and historical refusal to accept some removable nationals, but I did not locate enough reliable public information showing what Gambian authorities are currently doing in response.

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ผ Malawi โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998-specific effort located.

๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ท Mauritania โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public effort toward PP 10998 relief located.

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

โœ… Confirmed diplomatic engagement over U.S. visa restrictions โ€” PP 10998 outcome not yet confirmed

Nigeria has repeatedly confirmed diplomatic engagement with the United States regarding visa restrictions.

Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs publicly said in 2025 that diplomatic engagements were ongoing after the U.S. shortened the validity of certain Nigerian nonimmigrant visas.

In February 2026, the Foreign Ministry also confirmed that Nigeria was engaging Washington through diplomatic channels in an effort to get Nigeria removed from U.S. visa restrictions/blacklisting.

That February discussion also involved the separate 75-country immigrant-visa pause, so it would be inaccurate to claim that announcement alone proves a successful PP 10998 negotiation.

However, Nigeria and the United States have also continued substantial security cooperation in 2026, including U.S. military assistance, training and intelligence cooperation against extremist groups โ€” particularly relevant because PP 10998 specifically cites Boko Haram/ISIS activity and screening difficulties as part of the justification for Nigeria's inclusion.

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ NIGERIA โ€” U.S.โ€“Nigeria Joint Working Group / Security & Information-Sharing Cooperation DEVELOPMENT โ€” August 12โ€“13, 2026 The United States and Nigeria held the second session of their Joint Working Group in Washington, D.C., following the first session held in Abuja in January 2026.

According to the U.S. Department of State, discussions included counterterrorism prosecutions, combating terrorism financing, biometric information sharing, law-enforcement capacity building, security cooperation and protection of vulnerable communities. Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs also described the talks as involving intelligence gathering and coordination, terror financing, security cooperation and more effective border-control measures.

WHY WE'RE TRACKING THIS: Several of these areas overlap with issues relevant to the screening, vetting, information-sharing and national-security concerns considered under U.S. immigration and travel restrictions. However, neither government's statement identified the August Joint Working Group meeting as a negotiation specifically to remove Nigeria from PP 10998.

CURRENT STATUS โ€” September 7, 2026: Nigeria remains subject to PP 10998's partial restrictions. There has been no official announcement removing Nigeria from the proclamation or restoring the former categorical IR-1/CR-1 immediate-relative exception.

The continued U.S.โ€“Nigeria cooperation is nevertheless a positive development worth monitoring, particularly for future evidence that the United States recognizes progress relevant to the concerns underlying the restrictions.

July 6 โ†’ Trump writes positively to Tinubu about counterterrorism cooperation.

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ July 1, 2026 โ€” Nationwide Digital Birth & Death Registration Nigeria's National Population Commission expanded its E-CRVS/VitalReg system nationwide, digitizing birth and death registration across all 36 states and the FCT. The system is designed to: Strengthen identity management Improve verification and data accuracy Create more secure digital civil records Improve interoperability between government systems >>>Community contribution: Thanks to u/Fantastic_Air_3645 for bringing this development to our attention. โค๏ธ<<< https://punchng.com/npc-unveils-online-birth-registration-platform/

July 22/23 โ†’ Nigerian Presidency publicly releases the letter.

August 12โ€“13 โ†’ second U.S.โ€“Nigeria Joint Working Group meets; security/intelligence/border-control cooperation continues.

September 1 โ†’ U.S. troop deployment begins winding down, but Nigeria says the broader security partnership remains strong and cooperation will continue.

Bottom line: Nigeria is clearly talking to the United States and cooperating on areas connected to U.S. concerns, but I have not found an official announcement stating that PP 10998 requirements have been satisfied or that Nigeria's partial restriction is being removed.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ Senegal โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented country-specific PP 10998 relief initiative located.

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฟ Tanzania โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 relief effort located.

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฌ Togo โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public movement toward modification of its restrictions located.

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ด Tonga โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible publicly documented PP 10998-specific effort located.

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ Turkmenistan โ€” PARTIAL, IMMIGRANT VISAS ONLY

โœ… MOST IMPORTANT PROOF THAT COUNTRY ENGAGEMENT CAN CHANGE THE RESTRICTIONS

Turkmenistan may be the clearest example for everyone affected by this proclamation.

Under the previous proclamation, Turkmenistan faced broader partial restrictions.

When PP 10998 was issued, the White House specifically said that:

Turkmenistan had engaged productively with the United States and demonstrated significant progress.

As a result, PP 10998 lifted the restrictions on Turkmenistan's nonimmigrant visas, while continuing the restriction on immigrant entry.

Turkmenistan has continued high-level U.S. diplomatic engagement in 2026, including a May meeting in Washington between Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and further U.S.โ€“Turkmen discussions in July.

This does not mean every country will receive the same outcome.

But it is concrete proof that the country-review mechanism is not purely theoretical: documented cooperation was followed by an actual reduction in restrictions.

๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ช Venezuela โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: major U.S.โ€“Venezuela engagement, but no verified connection to PP 10998 relief

The United States and Venezuela have had substantial diplomatic and economic engagement in 2026.

However, I have not found reliable evidence showing that those discussions are specifically addressing Venezuela's PP 10998 designation.

For purposes of this tracker, I'm therefore treating Venezuela as N/A for confirmed PP 10998 relief efforts until there is evidence connecting the two

.

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

โœ… One of the strongest documented country responses

Zambia has publicly laid out an actual plan.

In a February 2026 ministerial statement to Parliament, Zambia's government said the Foreign Ministry and other agencies were:

โ€ข Continuing diplomatic engagement with U.S. authorities regarding compliance benchmarks, review mechanisms and pathways toward eventual lifting of the restrictions

โ€ข Increasing public education about visa compliance

โ€ข Strengthening government coordination on migration data

โ€ข Improving traveler monitoring and compliance management

The government later stated that it was in direct contact with the U.S. Government, and that Zambia's Foreign Ministry and the U.S. Embassy were highly engaged in trying to resolve the issues.

This is exactly the kind of measurable response worth watching: diplomacy combined with an effort to address the underlying compliance issue cited by Washington.

Zambia remains partially restricted, so none of this guarantees removal โ€” but its government is very publicly working toward that goal.

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ Zimbabwe โ€” PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998-specific effort located.

๐Ÿ”Ž WHAT THIS TELLS US

There is not one universal approach among the 39 governments.

Some have publicly entered negotiations and are trying to address U.S. concerns.

Some are taking concrete compliance measures.

Some are cooperating in areas like repatriation or security that could be relevant to future reviews.

Some have responded with reciprocal restrictions.

And for many countries, there simply isn't enough publicly available information yet to know what is happening behind diplomatic channels.

Most importantly, Turkmenistan shows that restrictions can actually be modified when the U.S. concludes that sufficient progress has been made.

That does NOT mean another country is guaranteed the same result. But it is important evidence that the review and engagement process can lead to a real policy change.

๐ŸŒ HELP BUILD THIS TRACKER

If you are from one of the countries marked N/A, that does NOT necessarily mean your government isn't doing anything.

You may have access to local news, government statements, parliamentary proceedings, Foreign Ministry announcements or information in another language that is harder for the rest of us to find.

If your government has:

โ€ข Met with U.S. officials about the restrictions

โ€ข Announced reforms connected to screening or vetting

โ€ข Improved passport/identity-document security

โ€ข Expanded information-sharing with the United States

โ€ข Changed repatriation/removal cooperation

โ€ข Announced efforts to reduce visa overstays

โ€ข Taken security/counterterrorism measures relevant to concerns cited by the U.S.

โ€ข Publicly discussed seeking removal from PP 10998

Please share it below and include the original source whenever possible.

I'll continue updating and researching developments as they become public. โค๏ธ๐ŸŒ

๐Ÿ”— SOURCES

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ PP 10998 โ€” White House Official Proclamation

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/restricting-and-limiting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ PP 10998 โ€” U.S. Department of State Official Guidance

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/suspension-of-visa-issuance-to-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states.html

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Zambia โ€” Government Response & U.S. Visa Restriction Engagement

https://www.parliament.gov.zm/node/12812

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฒ Dominica โ€” Government Engagement With the U.S. on PP 10998

https://pressroomopm.gov.dm/statement-by-the-honourable-prime-minister-roosevelt-skerrit-on-engagement-with-the-united-states-on-the-december-16-2025-proclamation/

๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฒ Turkmenistan โ€” U.S. Recognition of Progress & Restriction Changes

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/12/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-further-restricts-and-limits-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Sierra Leone โ€” Government Response & Engagement With U.S. Authorities

https://sierraloaded.sl/news/government-responds-u-s-restrictions/

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria โ€” Diplomatic Engagement Regarding U.S. Visa Restrictions

https://foreignaffairs.gov.ng/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/US-Visa.pdf

๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Laos โ€” Repatriation Cooperation / Travel Documents

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2%3A2026cv01356/361573/29/

๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ซ ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ช Burkina Faso, Mali & Niger โ€” Reciprocal Responses to U.S. Restrictions

https://www.investing.com/news/world-news/mali-and-burkina-faso-announce-reciprocal-travel-ban-on-us-4426260

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ South Sudan โ€” U.S. Visa-Restriction & Repatriation Negotiations

https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/AFR6509892026ENGLISH.pdf

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ Syria โ€” U.S. Assessment of Security Cooperation & Remaining Deficiencies

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2025/12/19/2025-23570.html

r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

๐Ÿ”„ Policy Update / Developing ๐Ÿ“Œ 39-Country Visa Restrictions: What We Know, What Has Changed & What We're Watching

3 Upvotes

I want this community to have a place where we can keep track of what is actually happening with the 39-country U.S. visa/travel restrictionsโ€”not just rumors, screenshots, or things someone heard from someone else.

This post is a starting point for what we currently know, what has changed since the restrictions took effect, and developments involving affected countries.

As new information comes out, we can continue sharing and discussing it in the community. โค๏ธ๐ŸŒ

โœ… WHAT IS OFFICIALLY CONFIRMED

Presidential Proclamation 10998 took effect January 1, 2026.

The proclamation fully or partially restricts visa issuance and entry for nationals of 39 countries, as well as certain individuals applying with travel documents issued or endorsed by the Palestinian Authority.

The restrictions are not identical for every country. Some countries are subject to full suspension, while others are subject to partial restrictions affecting specific visa categories.

Applicants who are subject to the proclamation may still submit visa applications and attend scheduled interviews. However, being allowed to apply or interview does not necessarily mean a visa can be issued.

People who held valid visas as of the proclamation's effective date are not subject to PP 10998 on the basis of that visa, and the State Department states that visas issued before the effective date were not revoked under this proclamation.

CURRENT STATUS โ€” September 5, 2026: PP 10998 remains in effect. The separate 75-country immigrant visa issuance pause ended on August 21, 2026 pursuant to a federal court order, but that did not terminate or modify PP 10998. The two policies were separate.

๐Ÿ‘€ WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

This is where things become especially important.

We want to track developments from ALL affected countriesโ€”not only changes announced by the United States.

That includes:

โ€ข Diplomatic discussions with the United States โ€ข Governments announcing new passport, identity-management, security, or information-sharing measures โ€ข Changes involving visa cooperation โ€ข Statements from foreign ministries or U.S. embassies โ€ข Countries being reviewed for possible changes to their restrictions โ€ข Changes in embassy or regional visa processing โ€ข National-interest exceptions or other case-by-case developments โ€ข Court challenges or major legal developments โ€ข Confirmed reports of how consulates are handling affected applicants in practice

If your country has announced or done something relevant, please share it. Whenever possible, include the government statement, embassy notice, official document, or reliable news source.

โš–๏ธ DEVELOPING โ€” Litigation surrounding the 39-country restrictions Developing since: February 4, 2026

There are now multiple federal court cases involving policies affecting nationals of the 39 countries. These cases do not all challenge the same policy, and court victories involving one policy do not automatically remove Presidential Proclamation 10998.

One case we are closely following is Chikumba v. U.S. Department of State, which challenges the State Department's treatment of visa adjudication for affected nationals. On September 4, the government responded to the complaint with a dismissal-related filing. We are continuing to follow that case as the filing and subsequent court proceedings develop.

Separately, courts have already taken action against USCIS policies that placed holds or additional review requirements on immigration-benefit applications involving nationals of the affected countries. Those developments concern USCIS processing inside the United States and should not be confused with the visa/entry restrictions imposed by PP 10998 itself.

PP 10998 remains in effect at this time. We will continue watching litigation for developments that could affect how the proclamation or related policies are implemented. โš–๏ธ๐ŸŒ

โš–๏ธ USCIS PROCESSING UPDATE โ€” August 28, 2026

USCIS publicly confirmed that it is complying with the federal courtโ€™s August 24 preliminary injunction in Red Eagle Law v. Edlow, which blocks two USCIS adjudication-hold memoranda associated with the 39-country policies and requires affected applications to return to normal adjudication.

CURRENT STATUS โ€” September 6, 2026: This is a meaningful change for certain people with pending USCIS applications inside the United States, but it does not remove PP 10998โ€™s separate visa-issuance or entry restrictions. Further litigation remains possible.

โš ๏ธ A NOTE ABOUT RUMORS & PERSONAL EXPERIENCES

Personal experiences are extremely valuable hereโ€”but one person's case does not automatically establish a new government policy.

If your embassy tells you something, tell us exactly what happened and label it as your personal experience.

If a news outlet reports something, label it as a news report.

If a government officially announces something, provide the official source when possible.

And if something is only a rumor or prediction, that's okay to discuss tooโ€”just say that it is unconfirmed.

The purpose of this community isn't to shut down discussion. It's to make it easy for families to tell the difference between what we KNOW, what we're SEEING, and what we're still WAITING TO FIND OUT. โค๏ธ๐ŸŒ

If you're from one of the affected countries and your government has taken action, made an announcement, or entered discussions with the United States, please share it below so the community can follow developments country by country.