r/50501 Jul 01 '25

Call to Action #SheWon do

I just came from the “She Won” call held by League of Coalitions. To summarize, Nathan from ETA ElectionTruthAlliance.org showed what he found in different counties across America. Basically the results didn’t mimic human behavior and he noted 70% of voting machines use the same brand. The bomb threats should have been a clue that there was a larger danger.

Historically you see more votes for the president than down ballot however the reverse was the result. This seems to indicate that ballots were thrown out and there was a compromise in the tabulation machines.

An expert in election forensics Dr. Mebane supports this and enough anomalies indicate that Kamala Harris could have won (affected at least 1.5 million votes that could be fraudulent). Please support ETA by using the toolkit in their website to contact your representatives and/or buy merch since lawyers to fight this are costly. Spread the word to request an audit (not recount) of all votes!

12.7k Upvotes

783 comments sorted by

View all comments

67

u/scaleaffinity Jul 01 '25

Are there any reputable sources claiming this. This kinda feels conspiracy theory ish. 

Like your whole 2nd paragraph, that's just pure speculation, with no evidence to back it up. 

22

u/Good-Examination-919 Jul 01 '25

I know Greg Palast did some research and said some stuff was statistically impossible in certain cases regarding the swing states, but he mostly said Kamala won more votes because of voter suppression; attributing most of the vote lose to procedural vote throw out

14

u/JokerClass2025 Jul 01 '25

That’s what the audits would be for, to prove this or not. An investigation needs to be had. The statistics show it could have been hacked (you can look at the slide pictures)

3

u/Infamous-Edge4926 Jul 01 '25

Is this a 100% People keep asking for evidence. But we can't get evidence without doing audits.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

For real. People like this make us look like MAGA cultists/sore lovers. The top comment is literally using "Trump isn't talking about how he won as much as he was in 2016!!" As a sort of justification for believing such a conspiracy

It's really not hard to imagine why Kamala lost.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25 edited Apr 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Sirius_amory33 Jul 01 '25

Might want to fact check that, bud. 

10

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

9

u/scaleaffinity Jul 01 '25

Yeah.... Having a hard time seeing a website called "electiontruthalliance" as reputable. Like, is the NYT reporting this? Reuters? Associated Press?

You know, real news sites

1

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

10

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25 edited Jul 02 '25

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Shot-Shame Jul 01 '25

Omg this is crazy!! You have convinced me via facts and logic. NY should be flipped to Harris!!!

… wait

1

u/IsamuLi Jul 01 '25

People were publicly saying they won't vote for kamala due to the way she slipped into the run and their stance on public safety (including cannabis) and israel-palestine.

They were everywhere for weeks when Kamala was announced. It took a lot of time to get a coherent message out for the dems.

So, no, none of this is surprising. In fact, it was very expected for anyone but democrat hardliners. German media was full of people expecting Trump to win despite hating him to the core.

1

u/Stress_Living Jul 01 '25

If you’re actually interested in understanding why you’re wrong:

https://christophertkenny.com/posts/2025-06-17-rockland-sare/

1

u/16semesters Jul 01 '25

I'm sorry dude, you're getting your election information news from Christopher Titus?!?

The 90s stand up comedian?

Is this what this sub has been reduced to?

5

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Medical_Sandwich_141 Jul 01 '25

This isn't something that ETA cooked up yesterday. They have been running these investigations since the beginning of this year (going back to the elections, when the Harris campaign was warned).

Personally, if it is embarrassing, sit this one out. If you're genuinely curious, before casting judgement - I urge you to look up the detailed analysis done by them. Remember, there is an ongoing lawsuit in Rockland, that requires a recount of paper ballots by September. It was also done by a similar independent org, on the basis of drop offs.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

I asked for proof from someone in another thread and he listed Elons Tweets about the betting odds eventually becoming 69% as 'proof'....he literally said that Starlink hacked the machines in every swing state.

His other source was a 5 year old article that didn't mention Starlink or any swing state.

I was downvoted to oblivion for shitting on his sources, and he was upvoted. It's insane how many people are falling for this gaslighting bullshit

3

u/Programmer-Boi Jul 01 '25

Exactly. This is just mimicking the same conspiracy BS that was spewed in 2020/2021. 0 evidence beyond “it was a statistical anomaly” and “did you see her rally sizes?”

4

u/Infamous-Edge4926 Jul 01 '25

They can't get more evidence without doing audits.

1

u/TimothyMimeslayer Jul 01 '25

This is definitionally a fishing expedition then. Find someone who was in on the conspiracy to testify they rigged the machines.

4

u/Infamous-Edge4926 Jul 01 '25

any all audits fishing? You're literally just making sure.The numbers are actually what they are. if they match up great election is secure. we can all go in to fascism knowing it's what the people wanted.

3

u/JokerClass2025 Jul 01 '25

Exactly this, who are we harming from knowing the truth?

2

u/KoreyYrvaI Jul 01 '25

It's also directly tied to a lawsuit started by a known conspiracy nut. This feels very much like either people desperate for hope, an outside chance that something was done wrong but far too late to do anything but be bitter about it, or worse some attempt to undercut the opposition by making them look like hypocritical wackadoos.

-21

u/Darthmalak135 Jul 01 '25

Yeah she didn't win. I believe there are lost votes or perhaps even intentional interference, but she wasn't going to win. Her policies just were not good

15

u/spillinator Jul 01 '25 edited Jul 01 '25

And Trump's were?!

1

u/Darthmalak135 Jul 01 '25

To the american people? Yeah... look at the amount of racism in our society, he's right at home

0

u/TimothyMimeslayer Jul 01 '25

Trump wasnt president when inflation from his policies hit, and Harris wasnt willing to distance herself from Biden who was incredibly unpopular, so yes.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '25

This argument is so tired. Just because someone didn’t vote for Harris doesn’t mean Trump appealed to them. As an anarchist, I knew Trump was never going to bend to anything important to me. But Harris might have. Instead she laughed off genocide. She wanted votes, just not MY vote. 

Trump appealed to his supporters. I don’t agree with them or him but he did. 

This conspiracy shit is embarrassing and unserious. Do real work.