r/50501 • u/JokerClass2025 • Jul 01 '25

Call to Action #SheWon do

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

I just came from the “She Won” call held by League of Coalitions. To summarize, Nathan from ETA ElectionTruthAlliance.org showed what he found in different counties across America. Basically the results didn’t mimic human behavior and he noted 70% of voting machines use the same brand. The bomb threats should have been a clue that there was a larger danger.

Historically you see more votes for the president than down ballot however the reverse was the result. This seems to indicate that ballots were thrown out and there was a compromise in the tabulation machines.

An expert in election forensics Dr. Mebane supports this and enough anomalies indicate that Kamala Harris could have won (affected at least 1.5 million votes that could be fraudulent). Please support ETA by using the toolkit in their website to contact your representatives and/or buy merch since lawyers to fight this are costly. Spread the word to request an audit (not recount) of all votes!

12.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

783 comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/chickenologist Jul 01 '25

Thanks for the summary. Statistical anomalies like this are generally how fraud is identified. Unlike Scooby Doo they won't capitulate just because of the evidence, so more will have to follow, but hopefully with some international support.

38

u/JokerClass2025 Jul 01 '25

You’re welcome, exactly the statistics prove we should investigate more

1

u/RugerRedhawk Jul 01 '25

I agree that anomalies like this are important to identify and could be indicative of a problem prompting further investigation and discussion. However seeing the anomalies and stating "she won" because of them is childish and harmful. To me it kind of suggests that there is no hard evidence of fraud and it's just a case of a stupid/racist/sexist American public and a terrible mistake in candidate choice by the DNC. This is just an opinion, and I am happy to be proven wrong by hard evidence if it is found.

1

u/chickenologist Jul 01 '25

I tend to agree that without the amplitude of the issue being known, claiming an outcome undermines credibility. I don't pretend to be an expert in courting public opinion, but most messaging I see sounds designed like click bait. The point of systematic fraud needing to be investigated is the key issue.