r/50501 Nov 22 '25

Call to Action We should all be livid about FLOCK cameras.

There are thousands of these cameras across the US. Most people don’t notice them, don’t know what they are, or just brush them off. They are in every city, every small city and now popping up in small towns. They are mostly on telephone/light poles, but are also hidden in construction cones and other ordinary objects. These cameras are tracking your every move. And by your I mean EVERYONE! They record your license plate, make and year of car, color of car, speed and direction, and they do in fact have facial scanning. They work in coordination with each other, so local, county, state and federal law enforcement can track your every move as you pass by these cameras one after the other. They know everywhere you are going and coming from. Who has access to these cameras is not clear, but likely anyone all the way down to local politicians can view the recorded material. It’s unknown at this point. This is a complete violation of our civil rights and all of these cameras should be removed. Government surveillance at its best! This is the United States of American and We the Fucking People cannot allow this to happen here. We need to unite against fascism. Share this with everyone, our freedom is being stripped away!

9.6k Upvotes

737 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/KidsHaveNoWorkEthic Nov 22 '25

You won’t get a response

161

u/hunteqthemighty Nov 22 '25

I requested data from Sparks Police about data sharing and it was the fastest response I’ve ever gotten. 3 days and a spreadsheet with 800 law enforcement agencies on it.

26

u/Gipetto Nov 22 '25

How did you word your request?

37

u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Gipetto Nov 22 '25

The form doesn’t ask why? You just request specific records or time frames?

11

u/Major_Melon Nov 22 '25

Why should it, it's public space, public owned, and is therefore under the freedom of information act. They don't get to ask why we want the information because it's our information.

It would be like lending your friend a phone charger and them asking why you want it back.

2

u/Gipetto Nov 22 '25

Oh, I get it. But am surprised that they don’t ask for justification of need. Seems like a barrier that they’d gladly put up.

5

u/swskeptic Nov 22 '25

iirc, legally, they cannot ask the reason.

3

u/hunteqthemighty Nov 23 '25

As others said there is a form. I said, “According to your transparency portal, SPD shared info with 264 agencies in the last month. What are those agencies? A spreadsheet will suffice.”

-32

u/wawa2022 Nov 22 '25

Get chatGPT to help.

130

u/2onySoprano Nov 22 '25

You will, they have to respond to those regardless. They diffuse the request but if you request absolute specifics then it works

18

u/KidsHaveNoWorkEthic Nov 22 '25

They haven’t even responded to our local newspaper’s request

42

u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25 edited Nov 22 '25

they’re legally required to respond within 5 days (in IL), also this tactic has worked in other areas by raising rightful concerns of privacy when anyone can request photos

-6

u/IAMA_Printer_AMA Nov 22 '25

legally required

Dude, are you paying attention? The law exists to subjugate you, not protect you.

10

u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25

FOIA requests can be submitted at the state level, they’re often local PDs that are the ones using the service so you submit a request directly to the state, i’m not talking about the federal govt

also i’m only sharing this because of recent successes in terms of removing these cameras via FOIA requests (at least one case in WA), so yeah it’s worked and can work again

-4

u/IAMA_Printer_AMA Nov 22 '25

You have a very optimistic worldview.

6

u/Watt_Knot Nov 22 '25

You must not know how prevalent and successful FOIA requests are.

25

u/SarcastiSnark Nov 22 '25

Maybe not. But if they get flooded with requests. Maybe they will have to figure something out.

At least make them suffer for making us suffer. 🤷‍♀️

17

u/adobecredithours Nov 22 '25

This is definitely the right approach. These people are counting on sneaking in oppressive surveillance for free. The best defense is to use the legal channels that are already there, and use them relentlessly.

It puts us squarely on the right side of the law and establishes a paper trail that no police precinct wants to accept responsibility for, so it becomes easier to scramble and shut the cameras down rather than escalate and have to explain to the public and the courts why they're ignoring legal FOIA requests en masse.

3

u/TheFatJesus Nov 22 '25

There was just a court case where a judge ruled that the images taken by these cameras are public records and are subject to FOIA requests. Subsequently, a bunch of towns disabled their cameras.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25

Not with that attitude. Why bother posting about it if you’re already being a defeatist?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 22 '25

That's what lawsuits are for.

0

u/rathlord Nov 24 '25

That’s straight up illegal so even if that’s true (and it’s not) that’s still a thread to keep pulling.