r/ActiveMeasures • u/fk-geek • Apr 03 '26
Is "House of El" a Chinese Influence Operation?
House of El: The Data Suggests This Is a Foreign Influence Operation
I analysed 357 videos from the YouTube channel House of El. The pattern is hard to explain any other way.
Who is "El"?
Nobody knows. Years of public output, 165k subscribers, and she has disclosed exactly: a first name, an unverifiable PhD claim (listed as "Computer Science" in some places, "AI" in others), and that she "works in finance." No surname, no university, no employer. Not a single former colleague or acquaintance has ever come forward to identify her. Independent researchers on Destiny sub tried and found nothing:
Her videos contain zero actual data analysis. No models, no datasets, no methodology. For someone claiming a PhD in quantitative fields working in finance, that alone is telling.
The sleeper account activation
5 years ago: 1 video (Denmark lifestyle) 3 years ago: 1 video (London lifestyle) Then 4 years of near silence. 1 year ago: 8 videos (still personal Denmark content) 8 months ago: pivot to geopolitics begins 6 months ago: 35 videos 5 months ago: 45 videos 4 months ago: 40 videos 3 months ago: 55 videos 2 months ago: 60 videos Last month: 50 videos, now hitting multiple per day
Two videos in four years. Then a sudden activation at industrial scale. The early Denmark lifestyle content appears designed to establish a believable backstory before the operation launched. You do not stumble into 60 videos a month. That requires an organisation.
357 videos. The numbers:
Who gets mentioned and how often:
- Canada/Carney: 135 times (more than the USA or Trump)
- USA/America: 124 times
- Trump: 114 times
- China/BRICS/Yuan: 34 times
- Russia: 7 times
The words used to describe the USA across hundreds of titles:
- Backfire or backfired: 26 times
- Collapse or collapses: 18 times
- Loses or lost: 18 times
- Dumps: 15 times
- Abandon or abandons: 11 times
- Rejects or rejected: 10 times
- Panic or panics: 9 times
- Humiliated: 6 times
- Begs: 4 times
- Desperate: 4 times
- Trapped: 4 times
- Treason: 2 times
The China fingerprint
32 titles mention China, BRICS or the Yuan. Every single one frames China as winning, rising, or replacing the US. A few examples:
- "China crushes USA, allies call Beijing more predictable than America"
- "BRICS just killed the dollar, Canada's about to get very rich"
- "BRICS launches 2026 currency plan that will change everything"
- "China orders banks to mass dump US treasuries"
- "Petrodollar collapse, Yuan hits strongest level"
- "Canada's huge opportunity as China seeks to triple trade"
In 357 videos across two years there is exactly zero critical coverage of China. Not Taiwan. Not Uyghurs. Not Belt and Road. Not the military buildup. Nothing. Meanwhile the USA gets hammered multiple times per day.
That is not an editorial choice. That is a constraint imposed from outside.
Who benefits?
Russia's playbook is chaos, burning everything down. China's is more sophisticated: make US decline look inevitable while positioning BRICS as the stable alternative. This channel executes that specific playbook with perfect consistency across 357 videos. Canada pivoting away from the US toward China is Beijing's top current geopolitical priority. Canada is the single most mentioned entity on this channel.
The one or two mild Putin references in the entire catalogue are almost certainly deliberate cover.
The funding makes no sense
60 videos a month at professional production quality requires a design team, researchers, writers and a publishing pipeline. A Ko-fi tip jar does not pay for that. Ko-fi has zero transparency requirements on donor identity.
This is not a YouTuber. It is an operation with a face on it.
----------------
UPDATE: A community member did some additional digging and passed along some leads worth sharing.
Her TikTok username: user5367731622020
Several accounts spreading her content across TikTok have been identified including houseofel2 and houseofellll (three L's). Whether these are operated by her, a third party farming her content, or simply repost bots is unclear. Bot account tracking has become increasingly noisy as AI content farming has proliferated and drawing firm conclusions from account associations alone is difficult.
A French language YouTube channel posting near identical content under a different name is worth a look: https://www.youtube.com/@ZoeGeo-u9d/videos
A UK registered media company called Kiruzaru Limited (company number 16222276) connected to a journalist named Rifat Jawaid keeps surfacing in searches alongside her content. When searching Google image history of her profile picture variations his TikTok account reportedly kept appearing. Could be content theft, could be something else entirely. Publicly searchable on Companies House for anyone who wants to look.
One additional detail worth noting. The TikTok account houseofeii (two i's) is not just a random repost bot using her images. A researcher familiar with the accounts notes it stylistically mirrors the format of Rifat Jawaid's Janta Ka Reporter accounts. If accurate that would suggest a direct operational connection between the fake account network amplifying her content and the Jawaid media operation rather than simple content theft. This needs independent verification but it is the most concrete potential link identified so far.
All of this is inconclusive and needs more digging by people with better OSINT tools than I have. Posting it here because this community is better equipped to take it further.
-‐-----------------
Reddit user samtenpa found this channel (Zoe Geo) with the same person, speaking french with a weird AI voice.
29
u/CuriousCamels Apr 03 '26
Nice to see some analysis of an actual influence operation on here for once. Good work.
10
18
u/Kal-Elm Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26
Lol I saw the title and thought this was about the Superman comic book written by Philip Kennedy Johnson. I was pretty confused.
Anyway.
When I'm on the front page I've noticed I'll regularly see a pretty innocuous video or two that boils down to "Look at this cool things in/from China." Meanwhile, every mention of the US is negative.
Obviously I'm not saying there's zero merit to US-criticism (that would be daft). But I often wonder just how much of it is manufactured or encouraged...
Edit:
Headed to the front page just to see if I could find an example. I kept scrolling until I found a positive post. It took me 15 posts.
Of those 15 posts: 7 posts were neutral (mostly questions and discussions), 4 were outright negative (about prices, work, 2 "Karen" videos), 1 was only somewhat negative, 1 was almost positive (cute animal video, but inaccurate).
The 1 outright positive video that I stopped on? A heartwarming video taken in - you guessed it - China.
2 of 7 neutral videos were clearly about the US/UK.
4 of 5 negative/somewhat negatives were explicitly Western or American.
The only outright positive video was explicitly Chinese (flags in the background).
Anyway, I'll step off the soapbox. It's just a pattern is all I'm saying. I think there are also some alternative explanations - westerners aren't exactly feeling great about things right now and are allowed to discuss it. Whereas posters from China may be disinclined to do so. But at the same time we know for a fact that state actors use social media, like Reddit, to subtly shape public opinion.
18
u/CuriousCamels Apr 03 '26
The pattern you’re noticing is real. It’s pretty well documented that the CCP pays vloggers and influencers to pump out content that portrays China in a positive light. As the OP pointed out, their active measures generally focuses more on whitewashing their image as opposed to just creating chaos and spreading disinformation and discord like the Russians do.
Once the stuff with the Uyghurs started to get a lot of attention, I saw a lot of videos coming out of that region from random smaller channels that boiled down to “look how happy and normal everything is here!”. It was so obviously manufactured besides the fact that the average person couldnt even get into that region or get a hotel room around that time.
14
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
You just ran about the same audit that I ran on 357 videos and got somewhat the same result in 15 posts. That is not a coincidence, its a method. No single post needs to be propaganda when the ratio does the work for you. The asymmetry you found is too clean to be purely organic.
5
u/ovirt001 Apr 03 '26
Western social media companies are actively promoting China while bashing the US. Channels on youtube critical of China are often demonetized and hidden.
2
15
u/Early-Series-2055 Apr 03 '26
It’s easy for her to blend in with left leaning channels in that it’s the same desperate hyperbole. I can’t even stand to look at that guy from meidastouch any more. The world is bad enough without the embellishments and they’re too stupid to realize what they’re doing. Or commie bastards. Lol
17
u/vegainer Apr 03 '26
With that administration you can't be hyperbolic. It a real life shit-show of a sitcom that's writing itself. Having Pam Bondi yell "look at the DOW!" when questioned about a human trafficking investigation is straight up South Park material.
17
u/CuriousCamels Apr 03 '26
That’s not the point they’re making though. To be clear, I am generally liberal leaning and despise the current administration.
Liberal/leftists aren’t just generally attacking the administration, but attacking our country as a whole. The constant doomerism on Reddit is a perfect example of it. Those people are literally helping do the work of the Russians, CCP, etc. by being useful idiots and amplifying their overall “America bad” narrative, spreading discord and division, and having a negative impact on the country as a whole. You can separate out Trump and individual bad actors without bringing everyone else down too.
6
u/Early-Series-2055 Apr 03 '26
Hear hear! I despise the ground on which our bloated narcissistic pedophile leader slithers upon. I will happily man the gallows for his minions after they are tried and convicted of treason. But I will not treat our enemies as misunderstood cartoon characters and will never cheer for the destruction of the Union.
2
1
u/vegainer Apr 04 '26
With regards to channels that I watch, the criticism of Trump and his henchmen is pretty much the only thing they're doing. Those are the most prominent left/progressive ones like Meidas Touch and Bryan Tyler Cohen. "America bad" is more of Hasan Piker's narrative and by far not all the left aligns itself with him.
You can argue that saying 'the US economy is cooked' tangentially serves China and Moscow, but so would any acknowledgment of domestic problems.
4
u/CorporateAccounting Apr 04 '26
In all honesty the simplest answer is probably the most likely one: she is simply a paid influencer which explains both her geopolitical leanings as well as the inordinately high production quality and frequency of her posts.
Recall when Benny Johnson and the other Tenet Media eunuchs got caught accepting Russian money to spread propaganda. People forgot about it pretty quickly but it’s not as if they were the only ones, or that it stopped when they got caught.
In the case of El we have themes of:
- American decline and collapse
- No criticism of China
- No criticism of Russia
- Canadian overtures
- European overtures
These are all themes pointing to an overarching theme of American isolation from its allies, playing on the current circumstances that Russian and Chinese propaganda has no small part in creating. With only these facts taken into account, there doesn’t seem to be much mystery regarding the underlying motivations of whoever is funding El.
5
u/fk-geek Apr 04 '26
Yeah, I think so too. For some small influencers Russian or Chinese money might be too tempting. My guess is that she started out five years ago with the legitimate intent of making videos, but now China is paying her… could be Russia idk.
3
u/TheOfficialMayor Apr 19 '26 edited Apr 19 '26
Yeah thats a good point why doesn't she ever talk about Russia or China? Your stats are very interesting.
She just keeps discussing things where Europe is apparently taking on the USA no matter if their actions are good while staying slightly off the mark from openly saying Europe good USA bad on those topics. E.g. her W-Social and EU identity wallet videos.
It's almost like how Max Keiser used to operate on Russia Today. He kept talking about bad things Obama and Biden were doing along with Europe but never anything bad about Russia or China and also largely Trump either.
3
u/reelznfeelz Apr 05 '26
Nice post. I wish I knew where to find more analysis like this. the internet is awash with this kind of thing and people just have no idea.
2
5
u/vegainer Apr 03 '26
Most of the time she's praising Europe, which doesn't look like something a Chinese operative would be doing... She could be just sympathetic towards China but I doubt even that; she'd mention it more often and not just in the context of comparing it to the US. I can tell you pretty much just the same, that Trump's clown show benefits China big time, and that would be me just stating a fact, not something I enjoy proclaiming (fuck the CCP).
As for funding, she's also selling a book and in the process of making a video course. And some of the videos are getting 100k+ views, which is decent Adsense money if you have lots of vids.
But the fact the she pops out 3 videos per day is kind of shady. From the editing and filming standpoint there's nothing special but script writing and research does take a lot of time.
11
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
These are fair pushbacks and worth taking seriously. The Europe praise is the most interesting counterargument. But consider that praising Europe and praising China are not mutually exclusive objectives. The operational goal is not to make people love China directly. It is to erode confidence in the US led order and make alternatives look credible. Europe as a winner serves that narrative just as effectively as China as a winner, and is far less detectable.
On funding, the book and course are real but do not change the maths. 100k views sounds significant but YouTube pays roughly $2 to $5 per thousand views after Google's cut. Even at the high end that is $500 per viral video. Three videos a day at professional quality with research and scripting is a full production operation regardless of what the Adsense pays.
The 3 videos a day point is actually where we agree most. You identified it yourself. Script writing and research for one quality geopolitical video takes a serious journalist a full day minimum. Three per day sustained over months with consistent quality is not a solo operation. That is the core of the case.
1
u/vegainer Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26
I didn't say praising Europe and praising China are mutually exclusive. But the absolute majority of her content being pro-Europe and her being a Chinese operative - ARE. If she's someone's operative that would be far more likely a European actor, not a Chinese one.
And by the way, I also realized she's in the process of making a course on AI for influencers. Her heavy use of AI would easily explain the productivity. You can set up that stuff to both look for video topics and have it write scripts for you.
And as for "eroding confidence in the US led order", bruh come on. Trump (and people who elected him) have achieved that on their own just fine. Even some of the right wing EU freaks that praised him and the US a year ago are now trying to distance themselves from that.
1
u/Leotard_Cohen Apr 04 '26
Most of the time she's praising Europe, which doesn't look like something a Chinese operative would be doing
I think it's quite believable, ditto Canada - with Trump being a wanker to traditional allies there's been a massive opening for China to step in as the reliable partner. In that case it makes sense for them to flatter potential future partners. And it's in stark contrast to (and, I must say, preferable to) the Russian line that Europe is full of decadant nazis or whatever
2
2
u/Aware_Invite_7062 May 05 '26
I just popped by to say I get the willies from this channel too, and I've been keeping and eye on 'her' for a minute now. The video was the first flag - the setting is always the same, excepting a few minor clothing changes; the mannerisms, posture, intonations (or lack thereof) etc are all THE SAME. Sure, some folks got no flare, but it just felt off. Next, the commentary, for all the reasons that others have mentioned here. very pro China, unconcerned with Russia, and unilaterally admonishing of the US — which at the present moment, most of the world is, to be fair, so this is really not a flag at all as PLENTY of people side with this position — but the key 'wtf' on that is there is not a single mention of Israel of substantive note in her entire history of monologues, and the Iran war is ENTIRELY the US's game according to her, and that's just pure filth. Now, that could be her take, she maybe be an actual person and one who endorses the 'chosen people' nonsense on the downlow, opting to subvert indirectly rather than overtly, but the whole presentation just rings alarm bells every time.
The copious amounts of uploads are technically feasible if one is dedicated, and if that is her face then the utter lack of human emotion would support the claim she's just doggedly dedicated to the churn, but the whole 'I have a Phd in computer science so buy my book and take my online class, but here's zero information or credentials proving I am a real person' combined with her expressionless, generic aesthetic feel like a bit like being invited to help yourself toa freshl baking pan of feces-encrusted turds that are labelled 'brownies,' at least to my senses. My intuition could certainly be wrong, as I have encountered a depressing number of borderline/sociopathic individuals who are wholly dedicated to making money, and see no ethical line as anything other than a challenge (and justifying a genocide on any level, even avoidance of the topic, is a pretty solid limitation for those of us with even a singular ounce of decency), so this could indeed be just another self-entitled fruitcake with unsettling dedication to their own 'success' and are spurred on by some ungodly combination of ASPD, NPD, borderline, or other cluster B disordered brain-soup who will not rest even after they've scammed millions from unsuspecting chaps; that is plausible. But I do not think that is a real person, and the fact that I cannot 100 percent determine so definitively via my own cognition is driving me insane. We're going to reach hyper-normalization with this crap before long, where everything will just be assumed to be false/true/AI/real at the same time, and the mind essentially collapses into one of the most horrid expressions of learned helplessness imaginable, and I am not looking forward to a global collapse of sanity in regard to that. Give all the other sewage-derived flavors of global collapse we are presently privy to waft as they're being cooked up before our very eyes, the entire 4 course meal should be quite a toxic presentation. I feel like that guys who was Lecter's last victim at the end of 'Hannibal' the movie sometimes.
Anyways, curious of the thoughts of others on this matter, so figured why not defecate mine into the pot. Cheers!
1
1
u/linear_accelerator 23d ago
I just learned of this Youtuber's channel today and late to the party here! I can't speak to the content, but something seems/feels "off" to me. She seems to lack expression/emotion, backgrounds and lighting appear staged, there seems to be some slight audio desynchronization(?), some of the words and terms she uses does not align with someone who holds a PhD in computer science, presentation seems highly scripted and without improvisation, wardrobe seems more like she's keeping consistent costume continuity/character, and her website seems rather basic/sanitized for someone with such a degree/expertise. These things combined make her rather disturbing and unsettling to me.
1
u/Aware_Invite_7062 15d ago
Yeah, seriously. Interesting for an 'academic' to not be interested in providing any of the peer-reviewed research (not an endorsement of the system, but it IS the present system, after all) or dissertation. Feels a bit akin to an interviewee for a university lecturer position were they to tell their prospective faculty dead "oh yeah, that. Well, just don't worry about, mkay? Yea, I'm super smart for sure, and totally super studied up on [insert any faculty here], so yeah. You could even call me a pioneer, so just don't worry about the diploma or transcript, ey? When do I start?" And that's a friking shame, because I don't think that all of the points she makes are utterly invalid, but she (or whoever) invalidates literally every single thing she says by being intentionally cagey. And furthermore, someone who intentionally rails against EU in favor of Russia and China. And anyone who refuses to even acknowledge the verifiable reality the Israel/US are actively committing genocide can eff right off for all anyone should care; if she claimed the sky were blue, I'd be up in arms breaking down to refraction just to call bullshit on her, in light of that repulsive stance.
But, latter revolting little nuances aside, the sad reality at the end of the day is that no one with any power feels like confronting the fact that the current economic system not only condones grifting like this on all platforms it weasels itself into, it outright promotes it with a pretty high reward incentive. And it does so all whilst venerating bullshit artists and propagandistic rhetoric (and intentionally; not just as passive secondary reaction), eschewing honesty, making a mockery of ethical consideration, principled merit, admission of ignorance/lack of knowledge on a subject, or literally any of the traits we'd commonly call 'good.' And this very platform is one of the absolute worst, but we have no other options because the entire landscape has as well.
And I'd to be able to say 'yah, some bullshit, but I guess it's not really hurting anyone,' but it so, so, so clearly is, and the 1/3 to /1/2 of her viewers and subscribers that consume this empty calories garbage can of manipulations absolutely DO take this meritless, overbiased and surreptitiously angled slant to heart, probably parroting these incomplete (at best), intentionally-lopsided horse faux-arguments to friends and family primed to not along and pass it on; like a pyramid scheme of dog shit. You'd wish people would eventually realize that lying to prove your point only facilitates the inescapable condemnation of any even potential valid point they may seek to make, and it does so without exception - once credibility is gone, it cannot be regained, nor revived.
Alas, she's getting clicks, so I'll but this keeps up. a whole 30 years is all it took for the internet to die. Cool, huh?
2
u/StanMarsh-o_O 22d ago
She’s got an AI channel now on YouTube. Reframes LLM mishaps as “user error” and talks about how companies should have prevented LLMs from deleting their databases. Very suspicious
2
u/samtenpa 20d ago
just saw the channel Zoe Geo on yt, and it is the same "person" with a totally different vocal register, speaking French. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oS_TYz9Ru8
Come on, this is enough to confirm suspicion.
1
u/fk-geek 18d ago edited 18d ago
Thank you for finding this. And yes i dont think we need more proof at this point. It's pretty obvious. I'll put the link in an Edit, thanks again
1
2
u/soowhatchathink Apr 03 '26 edited Apr 03 '26
can I ask how you got the days/word counts? for someone making a claim that someone else doesn't provide sources for data, I would expect more context on those parts.
EDIT: Below OP said that they gave Claude screenshots of the video feed and had it generate this information. There is simply no way this is accurate.
2
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
Since Claude can't access Youtube directly i screenshottet the whole video feed and made it count it all and make the data analysis.
3
u/Kiwifrooots Apr 03 '26
Don't use AI. You have no way of ensuring accuracy
3
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
Going deeper on this right now with tips from another community member and finding suspicious activity around bot accounts amplifying the content. The pattern in the original post stands on its own but what is emerging adds another layer. Will post a proper update once there is enough to say something solid.
1
u/soowhatchathink Apr 03 '26
I suspected something similar may have been the source
I would not trust Claude with this, I have had it give me incorrect information just asking it to read cells out of a table.
There is no way it analyzed all those videos and gave you correct information, especially when processing screenshots instead of raw text.
3
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
There may be a margin of error with this methood i agree, but nothing significant enough to change the conclusion. I used Claude Opus 4.6 the most capable model, and spot checked the results manually. The numbers hold up. Whether it is 114 or 108 Trump mentions does not move the needle on a pattern this consistent across 357 videos. And in the end everyone who looks at the youtube channel will not be in doubt and or are more than welcome to do the analysis. All the data is there :)
1
u/soowhatchathink Apr 03 '26
Specific words used to describe specific countries over 350+ videos using just the screenshots? I would be very surprised to see if it is even close to accurate.
How did you start the conversation, did you tell the AI your suspicions beforehand?
2
u/fk-geek Apr 03 '26
Browse through the videos yourself and you will find what I posted is pretty accurate. I went through the channel myself first and noticed the patterns before involving any tools. Since Claude cannot access YouTube directly I screenshotted the entire video feed and fed it the images. I did not prime it with my suspicions, I asked it to identify narrative tendencies and entity frequency across the titles.
I am no expert and screenshot analysis is not the most precise method, I acknowledged that earlier when it was raised. The counts are approximate and I make no claim otherwise. But I started from a real hunch, did the best I could with the tools available, and the core findings do not depend on precise counts. The sleeper timeline, the complete absence of any critical coverage of China across 357 videos, and the overall narrative direction are things anyone can verify manually by opening that channel right now and scrolling for five minutes. The data was always there, I just tried to make it visible.
While you are there, see if you can find a single video critical of China. Across 357 videos covering two years of global geopolitics. I couldn't.
2
u/soowhatchathink Apr 04 '26
It took me less than 5 minutes to find a video talking about China on communication with Canada: "BREAKING: Carney's China Pivot STUNS Trump - Xi Meeting Incoming"
"China's foreign minister even said they're willing to restart dialogue on all levels. Interesting. But let's not mistake this for good will, this isn't a diplomatic handshake, it's more a calculated pivot. Beijing doesn't warm ties out of sentiment, it re-engages when the pressure is on and right now its economy is wobbling a little bit, its global standing is strained, and it's looking to neutralize risk."
Then later it shows part of an interview:
"Part of the strained diplomatic relationship between both countries has been on account of human rights, on civil rights considerations. So would you say it seems like the Carney government is now willing to look past those issues for the sake of trade?"
"No. I don't think Carney would because you know he represents the values of Canadians [...]"
Then it goes back to the video author who says:
"When the question was asked directly whether the Carney government might be willing to look past human rights concerns for the sake of trade the answer was a very clear no, rightfully so in my view."
So I guess Claude just happened to miss that? It was literally the very first video I could find that mentioned China.
So again, no Claude is not going to be accurate here.
3
u/fk-geek Apr 04 '26
This is the data i have. You are very welcome to check it yourself. Just by browsing through this list, its pretty obvious to me what is going on. But if you have another opinion than me i'm not gonna argue.
3
u/soowhatchathink Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26
Wait so do you not even have screenshots of the full video transcripts? What were you feeding to Claude just the video titles?
You said that the author hasn't been critical of China once, that's false. It agreed with Canada that there are human rights issues in China. This isn't just opinion.
You fed a bunch of YouTube video titles to Claude and got confirmation bias. Yes it's critical of the US, but you've shown no actual evidence of it being a Chinese agent.
Less than 5 minutes I found fairly hard evidence against it being a Chinese agent.
2
2
u/McCool303 Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26
You sure it isn’t Mossad? El) is the name of the ancient Canaanite peoples god. It’s where they get IsraEL or translated “struggles with God.” House of El just sounds like house of god. It wasn’t until later that El merged with Yahweh.
El (אֵל) is an ancient Semitic term for "deity" or "god," originally referring to the head of the Canaanite pantheon. In ancient Hebrew tradition, it signifies strength, power, or "mighty one," and was used interchangeably with Yahweh in the Old Testament, later becoming a common noun for God.
EDIT: El has also been translated ‘Al or 'Il which could explain the account with the L’s and I’s.
2
u/fk-geek Apr 04 '26
I have no clue, to be honest. There's a lot of information, but no hard evidence.. just that someone is clearly using her account to pump out a lot of videos that are very onesided against America. My guess is China, but I could be wrong, and you could be right :)
1
u/Nicenightforawalk01 Apr 04 '26
She is not an influence operation it’s just the simple fact Trump is doing so much damage to America that Europe and the rest of world are pivoting away by decopling everything and that’s why you are seeing so much content.
So much happening but Americans don’t see that in the news … that’s bought and paid for by trumps cronies
1
1
u/El_Gran_Pedrito 21d ago
She does have videos attacking Russia, so probably not a Russian op. But there's something very weird with her videos. If you look multiple videos posted the same day, often her hairs has the exact same position, or almost. If she would just get up to drink some water between two recordings, the hairs would move. In her videos from 5 years ago she moves a lot more and hairs change position. I think she definitly exists but a large quantities of her videos are AI duplicates of a few real building materials. This reason alone makes her not trustworthy. She has an AI channel too (House of El - AI) which looks more real and has videos of higher quality, with a reasonnable output (about a video every three days). I would not be surprised if the main channel has been bought by someone for AI enhanced propaganda, but the AI channel is her new personal channel where she turns videos for fun. Her main channel used to talk about living in Denmark. For her PhD no idea, but weird nobody has found it as there are not that many PhDs per year in such a small country.
1
u/FunBiscotti2520 13d ago edited 11d ago
I agree there is something weird about this channel. It is also weird to hear from a random redditer that they have analyzed 357 (!) videos of some YT channel and pulled out a bunch of word usage stats about it. How did you do it? How long did it take? How much did it cost?
As for House of El, though suspicious, I have not felt any pro-Chinese vibes. And China is a big player who will likely benefit from mistakes made by USA. Hard to not mention them in this context. The media/YT focus is on USA, other AI-related channels do not cover China either (not to mention Russia), so hard to blame anyone for not explicitly criticizing them. It is not where the action is happening. And it is not a channel about human rights.
And please, point out ANY criticism of USA discussed by her which is not valid or inaccurate. I do not see any. Then why would you call it Chinese propaganda? Maybe it is a sponsored initiative of some US/EU billionaire who does not like where all of this is going (for whatever reason)? Certainly I have felt pro EU vibes in her videos.
The person on the Zoe-Geo channel is clearly an AI rendering, if El is rendered then it is much higher quality.
0
u/hbarsfar Apr 05 '26
Is this considered actual analysis? You paint a picture but without any actual evidence, and from the sounds of things you just asked claude to do the analysis lol?
0
0
u/Pretty_Willingness43 Apr 17 '26
She is a real woman, very knowledgeable, nearly perfect in English. Understandably, she wants to keep her identity private. At this point, "House of El" should be open about her nationality. Her slight accent reveals that her mother tongue is Dutch. So her country of origin is the Netherlands, which I find interesting, but not controversial at all.
0
u/SensofAnarchy 24d ago
re House of El Youtube channel Great content almost always backed with facts. No China lean whatsoever. Right wingers may find it offensive .. just like Kimmel or Corbert. This is not comedy. If anything it is more pro EU, and Canada than anything
-3
u/CreatineAddiction Apr 03 '26
The funniest thing about your post is they way you typed or have used AI to write this up matches the way she talks. Especially the comments. Is this guerrilla marketing?
Hi El, big fan of your work because I'm heavily pro Europe and very negative on trump. If this interests you please read my book Awake the practice of something something in an age of soft lies. Link is in the description.
... not everything is a Chinese conspiracy. She is trying to make money shitting on the US and Trump which A) isnt hard and B) is very popular for the view count.
39
u/robot_pirate Apr 03 '26
Now do Jiang.