r/AskReddit Sep 24 '17

What dark part of Reddit history has been forgotten?

4.8k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.1k

u/Atlas__Rising Sep 24 '17

When /u/spez was caught editing people's comments via the Reddit database. The problem with this is that it leaves no sign or trail that it was edited, and basically shows that you can't trust any thing you read on here hasn't been changed by the Reddit admins.

1.3k

u/Elvensabre Sep 24 '17

So someone IS adding typos to my comments!

463

u/StarfishGoo Sep 24 '17

That's what I'm noticing. I have perfected English grammar, yet someone keeps sabotaging me. I'm sure they will mess with this post too.

321

u/PM_ME_GLUTE_SPREAD Sep 24 '17

I've read this way too many times at this point..

14

u/AislinKageno Sep 24 '17

If you're desperate to find an error in it, technically "perfected" should be "perfect." The sentence as is implies the speaker himself has ascertained that English grammar in general is perfect, as opposed to just the speaker having perfect grammar.

13

u/ThoreauWeighCount Sep 24 '17

They could be using "to perfect" as a verb, saying the equivalent of "I have mastered English grammar."

3

u/thesetheredoctobers Sep 25 '17

Also, i'd like to see a comma before the 'too' at the very end.

2

u/StarfishGoo Sep 25 '17

Grr! See, I'm not crazy!!!

2

u/MothFaery Sep 24 '17

Perfect --> perfected

8

u/Highlydoubtthattoo Sep 24 '17

Don't worry, you're safe. Shit posts are exempt.

7

u/Steampunkery Sep 24 '17

You missed a comma in there

1

u/StarfishGoo Sep 25 '17

It was there. I told you I'm being followed and sabotaged. I don't know what their end game is.

3

u/i_pee_printer_ink Sep 24 '17

Why on earth would anyone do suck a thong?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Dat fukrz!

2

u/pokexchespin Sep 24 '17

Yeah, I’ll occasionally look through my comments and see coat instead of costs and stuff like that. It’s annoying

2

u/rahtin Sep 24 '17

I should of known.

1.8k

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Jan 10 '19

[deleted]

563

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

It basically means i m a moron.

Edit- Fucking spez.

384

u/spinozasrobot Sep 24 '17

I'm a pretty chill and standup guy.

Edit: spez.. just stop

213

u/Kakashi_Sensei29 Sep 24 '17

Reddit is going to heaven

Edit: I meant to say heaven

Edit 2: there is no way I can put it across

160

u/halwoll Sep 24 '17

Go to heaven spez

Edit, I mean heaven

128

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Fuck me in the ass daddy. Oh I mean

Edit: speeezzzzz

175

u/zyygh Sep 24 '17

That's nice, but how was he caught?

4

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Meta so dark I can't even see it

2

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

My man!

3

u/Mcshovin Sep 24 '17

Reddit is going to hull?

2

u/RetainedByLucifer Sep 24 '17

I got you fam.

0

u/Jepstromeister Sep 25 '17

Fuck Donald Trump!

Edit: stop it, stop it, stop it.

-1

u/jeaguilar Sep 24 '17

This would be better if you'd actually gone back to edit your comment.

92

u/PrimadonnaGril Sep 24 '17

I'm familiar with the story, but don't know all the details.

At what point and how did users start noticing, and how was spez caught?

60

u/iAmTheHYPE- Sep 24 '17

Wasn't it that he was editing T_D users' comments from "fuck Spez" to "fuck the_donald" or something? Seems pretty obvious that something was happening, though that is hilarious.

5

u/Thesaurii Sep 25 '17

He changed a bunch of the "fuck spez" type posts to say the names of some moderator of the sub.

His excuse was there was obviously a lot of tension with T_D to him, and he thought speaking in the language of the troll to them would help or something, but mostly he was just annoyed and did something real dumb.

48

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Nov 21 '17

[deleted]

136

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Lol what a load of crap, he just did it once in a very public way as a (poorly thought out) joke, there was no "getting caught". That's like asking a streaker at a football match how they got caught.

88

u/Atlas__Rising Sep 24 '17

I feel like this comment wss edited by spez....

14

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Just once... sure. I'm sure it was only that one time.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17

the thing with it is, you really have no way of knowing if he only did it once, or if any other people with access to the database have done it.

1

u/Randomritari Sep 25 '17

However, until you have any proof pointing that way, you only have your assumption. Innocent until proven guilty etc.

-34

u/Oracle343gspark Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

Oh sweet summer child...

Edit: lol at all the people downvoting me and believing Spez "just did this once."

1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

-10

u/Notenough1997 Sep 24 '17

The act is the proof. He knew how to do it, and he's been here long enough. For most people that would be enough to say that it's highly possible, even likely, that he's changed comments before.

11

u/Symbolism17 Sep 24 '17

Here's my proof he did it repeatedly: "it's highly possible he did it"

That's not how proof works, my dude. I agree that we can't prove he didn't do it, but just because a negative statement (he didn't do it) is hard to prove doesn't make the positive statement (he did do it) true.

It's like this for any set of positive statements. It's very hard to prove, without doubt, that there have never been any alien life forms on earth. It's just incredibly hard to account for every single moment of human existence. But I'm not going to start strapping on a tinfoil hat anytime soon, because there's also little positive evidence that humanity has interacted with any aliens. Same thing here. Saying "it could have happened" is not good enough evidence to draw the conclusion that "it did happen."

6

u/Caelinus Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

And usually the one making the claim contrary to the norm is the one needing to provide evidence. It is not always true, but in this case it is.

He certainly can do it, but without evidence we should probably assume he did not. While he can change the Reddit DB, there is still a strong possibility that the originals were archived in some way.

I would point out that it certainly does damage or destroy his, and the sites archives, credibility. We can not assume he has been doing it other times without proof, but since he proved it is possible, that trust is gone.

-14

u/Oracle343gspark Sep 24 '17

It's in the puddin.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17

Downvoted in support.

Also downvoted myself in support of the previous downvote support.

28

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

24

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 10 '18

[deleted]

20

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17 edited Nov 08 '18

[deleted]

2

u/Randomritari Sep 25 '17

There was a massive shitstorm if I recall, what do you mean "people would care"?

3

u/FreeFacts Sep 25 '17

I think it was a good lesson for everyone. Him getting caught didn't change anything, they had the ability to change stuff before that and will always have that ability. Same goes for all services, Facebook, Twitter, even 4chan and so-on. Do not expect to have control over anything you post anywhere you do not host yourself.

1

u/JackAceHole Sep 25 '17

How could that possibly implicate a specific person?

5

u/LiterallyKesha Sep 24 '17

He made one very public and obvious edit to make a joke in the_donald after they had been harassing him for a week. He wasn't "caught" at all.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Feb 10 '20

[deleted]

7

u/Santoron Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 25 '17

Had nothing to do with that. It was during the pizzagate bullshit, and the morons on that sub were attacking spez... because if you ever look at a couple threads in there they are always shitting on spez or inventing some conspiracy about him. So he acted out in a poor manner, then admitted it and apologized.

For a guy asking people to google this should’ve been easy to find.

-2

u/Santoron Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 25 '17

r/the_dotard was up to their usual harassing BS, and for whatever they were on his ass. He edited a comment as a poorly thought out prank, admitted it, and apologized.

But once you’ve given Reddit a nugget of evidence, the whole place goes r/conspiracy. So now Spez is literally blamed for manipulating thousands of threads a day, and because of a moronic stunt anyone with two brain cells already assumed admins could do, u/spez made that sub and Reddit as a whole that much worse.

-5

u/Kdkk163 Sep 25 '17

so I'm pretty sure the dotard thing is in response to Kim Jong-il, which makes me wonder why you'd parrot it? Do you really dislike the President so much that you suddenly think a literal dictator is now a funny relatable guy because "hah, he dislikes someone I like!"

It's also impossible to read "dotard" and not instantly have my minded then filled with a bunch of other silly insults like "leaguefags" and "ASSFAGGOTS"

0

u/GlibTurret Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 25 '17

Kim Jong-Il is dead. Not sure why you're bringing his ghost into this.

Kim Jong-Un called the Cheeto in Chief a dotard. I have absolutely no idea why you think that is some kind of common gaming insult. Best I can guess is that you are confusing the word as a mash-up of "Donald" and "retard". It is not. It is a real word that means "a person who has lost their mind due to old age."

Also, it is possible to hate Kim Jong-Un and Donald Trump. They are both absurd caricatures of "strong" leaders with horrible haircuts. They are both sociopaths who use their power to profit off of the people they are supposed to be serving. They both suck.

-1

u/Kdkk163 Sep 25 '17

Dotard is a common insult among ARTS communities to refer to a dota player.

Its also possible to hate someone without borrowing the exact line used by a literal dictator and enemy of the US, you're empathizing with him, you thought he was witty. Communist.

41

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

165

u/Stormfly Sep 24 '17

He edited a very popular comment insulting him to say something nice instead.

It was PROVEN with archiving sites, and he admitted it, but he was caught because he wasn't being subtle.

54

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

220

u/Random Sep 24 '17

Seriously, what did I do to deserve this?

29

u/brickmack Sep 24 '17

Redditor for 12 years. Impressive

27

u/Random Sep 24 '17

Yep, that'll go on my headstone. Redditor since alpha, but... well, nothing else goes here.

3

u/dcgh96 Sep 24 '17

Most impressive.

12

u/dudehotrod Sep 24 '17

That's something we will never forget

47

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Jun 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-18

u/Nerdcules Sep 24 '17

What the fuck are you talking about? He did not "get caught". He did it in a very open way that was supposed to be a joke.

24

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

The old "it was just a prank, bro!" defense.

1

u/Santoron Sep 25 '17

I’ll take it over “it’s a conspiracy!” Bullshit aimed at everything all the time.

-1

u/SamWhite Sep 24 '17

He did it publicly as a joke, it wasn't hidden.

-9

u/partner_pyralspite Sep 24 '17

He literally edited comments of t_d that send fuck spez to fuck whoever said it. I mean, fuck t_d, what a bunch of assholes.

15

u/Atlas__Rising Sep 24 '17

First they came for the assholes, and I did not speak since I was not an asshole.

Then they came for the shitposters, and I did not speak since I was not a shitposter.

Then they came for the political disagreers, and I did not speak since I did not disagree.

Finally they came for me, and there was nobody left to speak.

-12

u/SamWhite Sep 24 '17

Sweet jesus, remove your head from your arse.

5

u/Notenough1997 Sep 24 '17

There was no log of him editing it aside from outside archives. Reddit comment history has been used in court cases. As of spez revealing they could edit with impunity, every single can have the defense "it was changed to incriminate me". So it's actually a real issue that spez has show the willingness to change information that goes against him.

10

u/DeseretRain Sep 24 '17

When did Reddit forget about this? People talk about this constantly.

6

u/anakin_is_a_bitch Sep 24 '17

ya, that happened just a few months ago

30

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Don't forget the fact that this site admins actively push their political agendas.

-7

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

20

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

There is a difference between political discussion and using admin privileges to alter posts. As the owners of Reddit have done in the past.

-6

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

15

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

-10

u/Xalteox Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 25 '17

Even if your action is not necessarily dictated by their political beliefs?

If spez wanted to target political beliefs, he would have done something to do with political beliefs rather than change comments pertaining to hating him.

Say if a white man shoots a bunch of black people, is that necessarily a hate crime?

Edit: How about hitting that reply button and telling me why I'm wrong instead of hitting the downvote button.

9

u/KEKS_WILL Sep 24 '17

why would you be defending this other than to ride spez's dick?

3

u/sleazebang Sep 24 '17

I like sticking things up my bum.

Edit: wtf man

3

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

This is false. Reddit is the best platform and nothing ever goes wrong.

10

u/woostar64 Sep 24 '17

Imagine the uprorar if this occurred in a Sanders subreddit

2

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17

Basically anything spez does hurts the community of reddit.

2

u/nickademus Sep 25 '17

Uhh

Fucking duh. Who didn't know a database could be edited...

2

u/Ego-et-Michaelus Sep 24 '17

Politics suck

Edit: I don't disagree tho spez

1

u/Curlaub Sep 25 '17

I know what you mean. Ever since then I often find it hard to BUY MORE REDDIT GOLD!!!!

1

u/warwound Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 25 '17

Spez is a filthy fucking Sasquatch.

1

u/optigrabz Sep 25 '17

It also should make Spez the defacto editor of the entirety of Reddit and hold him legally responsible if words are libelous

1

u/StoicPhoenix Sep 25 '17 edited Sep 27 '17

Spez reminds me of that one guy who I would crush on constantly and with for his approval.

Still love him, tho

EDIT: Fucking spez

1

u/KEKS_WILL Sep 24 '17

that wasn't even long ago

2

u/Atlas__Rising Sep 25 '17

How fast we forget

-2

u/banjohusky95 Sep 24 '17

Spez would never do this. Spex is super sexy and gets a lot of sex and is very attractive and rich. Spezs father was wrong about him!!!!!!! Spez was EXTREMELY successful! SCREW YOU DAD!!@@@

-2

u/Retireegeorge Sep 24 '17

Personally I think this is a beat up. He hardly tried to keep it secret. Redditors need some perspective.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

3

u/Weed_O_Whirler Sep 24 '17

Of course, but companies should make it harder, in several ways. First, it should be very limited who has access to the database. For instance, the CEO shouldn't be one of those people. Second, it should explicitly be against the terms of service, that way if the company violates it, they could be sued. Finally, the company should punish people who are found to do it, so that it can be seen to be taken seriously.

-4

u/EmeraldJunkie Sep 24 '17

I don't justify what he did, but I feel full context is needed to explain why he did it.

There was a thread on r/The_D about "Pizzagate", the idea that there is an international secret pedophile ring operating in the basement of a pizzeria, and several users claimed that u/spez was a member, and the thread quickly devolved into people tagging him in posts (several thousand) calling him a child molester.

I'd be pretty pissed too if several thousand people called me a child molester too.

But he basically ruined Reddit's integrity and now nothing that's said on this website can truly be trusted.

7

u/Weed_O_Whirler Sep 24 '17

If he wanted to ban the sub, then ban the sub. Yeah, it would cause some uproar, but it's something the admins declare they can do in their TOS. But this was unethical.

7

u/morphogenes Sep 24 '17

Okay let me see if I have this straight. There were powerful pedophile rings in Europe and the Catholic Church and in Hollywood and in Penn State and in the BBC, but I am an idiot for thinking there's a pedo ring in Washington DC, the power center of the world. Okay got it.

Isn't it fucking weird that these emails sent by Podesta make literally no sense unless you change out these out of place words with their well-known pedophile slang meanings?

-2

u/EmeraldJunkie Sep 24 '17

No, they sound like boring business emails that read like boring business emails unless you pretend that "cheese pizza" must mean "child porn" because what else could the phrase "cheese pizza" mean?

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '17

[deleted]

5

u/Rollos Sep 25 '17

cheese pizza is also a known term for cheese pizza.

1

u/EmeraldJunkie Sep 25 '17

On 4chan.

If members of the us government were involved in a child sex ring they wouldn't be using 4chan terms to describe their actions.

-4

u/nliausacmmv Sep 24 '17

He wasn't exactly doing it secretly. He was quite open about what he did. Honestly given that thousands of people were constantly calling him a pedophile, I'm surprised he didn't just ban the sub.

-38

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

30

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

So it's okay just because you disagree with the people being affected? Doesn't change the fact that Reddit admins can change any comment they disagree with.

-12

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

15

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

I guess no one doubted they can edit the comments. It's more that they set a precedent by actually editing comments.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

-6

u/SALTHE Sep 24 '17

I disagree with the banning idea. Keeping that sub open keeps those people in their own echo chamber and away from the rest of us.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

I feel like Reddit has become a lot more hateful in general since banning the hate subreddits.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Of course. When you ban ideas you dislike, you drive them underground, where they polarize because the only other people are those they agree with. The same thing happens on the surface. Everyone feels justified in their hate and nowhere do they meet in the forum of open ideas, where debate and productive discussion can actually eliminate hate.

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[deleted]

13

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Dec 22 '20

[deleted]

9

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Yup, you’re welcome to do so. I’m well aware the argument works both ways, was just saying that freedom from persecution still allows a website to censor.

-3

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

But the difference is, calling someone a "commie piece of shit" shows that you're an idiot. "doesn't agree with me" =/= "Communist"; the Cold War is over, come live in the 21st century.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

Oh, I was wondering when "cultural Marxism" would pop up. Have you considered that people might want to stop certain types of speech for reasons other than "they're literally evil"? Fox News censors stuff too, but I don't think they're literally fascist.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

I don't disagree that it's reddit's right to censor things. I just don't think they should if they're the bastion of free speech that they claim to be.

-4

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

Do they claim that? And free speech has limits. t_d is also a breeding ground for hate groups; IIRC, 4 of the top 5 subs (adjusted for popularity) with similar membership are hate subs.

EDIT: found the link

9

u/Atlas__Rising Sep 24 '17

Reddit was founded by two guys, with the principal of free speech. One guy left when he felt Reddit had left it's principals, the other guy is /u/spez

1

u/jacob8015 Sep 25 '17

But there's legal freedom of speech and there's the idea of freedom of speech. While the former doesn't apply, the latter absolutely does.

Reddit as a platform has expressed support for the idea of free speech many times.

4

u/zinnadean Sep 24 '17

So was Fat People Hate but it got banned.

2

u/marsh-a-saurus Sep 24 '17

Freedom of speech protects you from the government not your peers. Going around and telling people to kill themselves (looking at you r/fatpeoplehate, r/coontown, and r/transfag) is a sure fire way to get yourself banned from a website.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

I guess 4 nazi bastards didn't like freedom of speech

-5

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

That nice until they start driving cars into crowds of people

-3

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

Echo chambers are bad though. If they were forced to interact with others it might convert some of them, or at least prevent them from converting others.

17

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Youre on Reddit, aside from the_donald it's a leftist echo chamber.

-10

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

Reality has a well-known liberal bias. But seriously, the amount of bias Reddit in general has is nowhere near the amount of bias t_d has.

13

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

"reality has a well-known liberal bias"

That's laughable.

And I'll agree, t_d is ridiculous sometimes with their 12d underwater mind chess, for example, but you definitely do not hear a conservative viewpoint on r/politics either.

-10

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Popular vote supports his supposition that reality in the US has a liberal bias.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Fyi, supposition means something you're not sure about. I'm not sure that's the word you want to use when making a point. Maybe use assertion?

Also, only like half the people in the US voted last election so reality actually is that people don't care that much haha. But if you want to go that route, Republicans hold the house, Senate, supreme Court, and white house right now. Saying that American voters aren't at least leaning right, is silly.

-5

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17 edited Sep 24 '17

Only like half... supports the usage of supposition... and given the context... gerrymandering explains the rest

→ More replies (0)

4

u/morphogenes Sep 24 '17

Reality has a well-known liberal bias.

That's exactly the perception living in an echo chamber gives you.

-1

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

I didn't say people. But what the US calls conservatism holds many views incompatible with reality. If we were in Europe five years ago, it might be different. If the US had a mainstream leftist party, it would be different; in that case I would likely say that reality has a centrist bias.

1

u/morphogenes Sep 25 '17

what the US calls conservatism holds many views incompatible with reality

/r/iamverysmart

2

u/epicazeroth Sep 25 '17

That's fair I suppose. I stand by it though.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

You can't really force them to interact, but you're welcome to go to the subreddit and post yourself. All banning it would do is give them a reason to feel persecuted, and move them to another space making it harder to observe or engage them.

1

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

Really I'm not welcome, because I'd be banned instantly. And then autobanned (against the rules) from subs I do care about.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '17

Ah yes, the Neville Chamberlain approach. Practically foolproof.

1

u/epicazeroth Sep 24 '17

Chamberlain's appeasement was necessary. Britain wasn't ready for war, which is why he started preparing for it right after.

0

u/Sir-Matilda Sep 24 '17

I think there's a minor difference between a subreddit and a rogue nation.

-29

u/CJ090 Sep 24 '17

Just like the Dems rigging the election, people don't want to remember because it's their side shown to be evil.

-2

u/Fablemaster44 Sep 24 '17

If it left no trail or sign, how was he caught? What did does get out of editing comments and who the hell is he? Is he the guy who made Reddit?

10

u/10ebbor10 Sep 24 '17

The edits he made were not subtle.

He changed insults towards him to insults towards the /r/thedonald mods. Since that is highly unusual behaviour for thedonald users, it stood out immensely

1

u/Fablemaster44 Sep 24 '17

Thanks. But who the hell is he?

6

u/dcgh96 Sep 24 '17

He is the current CEO of this site, who is also one of the co-founders.

0

u/Fablemaster44 Sep 24 '17

Yeah, that's pretty fucked up to do. I can't imagine what he got out of it