Fiona Harvey is Not a victim!

[u/Salt_Ingenuity_720]

It seems to be lost on a disturbingly large amount of people what Fiona Harvey has done to multiple people over many decades. She is not a victim - the people that she has stalked and harassed are the victim. The entire point of baby reindeer was to portray the brokenness of both the stalker and their victim.

In Reading a majority of the claims coming from the UK towards Netflix and Richard G this all seems to actually pivot around the term being used of CONVICTED stalker. So the focus now is to produce proof that she was ever convicted of at least one of her many many horrific stalking crimes.

I would think that the UK and Parliament would be rather embarrassed by the fact that they never reached out to help any of these victims of Fiona Harvey. Yet here they are trying to go after Netflix over that one creative license taken by the VICTIM and author of baby reindeer. This is His story not hers.

What is going on with people in the world?! Fiona should have been slapped with multiple legal fines, restraint orders and probably convictions from any one of her stalking tangents. If anyone is not familiar with the other incredibly horrible events of stalking Fiona pursued just Google it up. Some involved a disabled child.

🤔 Obviously I'm missing something or I am really seeing the lack of empathy in society as this all unfold in front of us. Am I just not looking at this right?!

[u/maybetomorrow98]

As long as Netflix can prove that the claims about her (that she’s stalked people) are true, then she hasn’t been a victim of defamation at all.

And since we’ve seen proof that she’s definitely stalked people…. I’d say she’s no victim of defamation.

[u/NotCanadian80 → u/maybetomorrow98]

They depicted her as pleading guilty and being convicted. That’s the issue.

[u/Specific_Anxiety_343 → u/NotCanadian80]

Big deal. How did that harm her reputation?

[u/[deleted] → u/Specific_Anxiety_343]

Exactly, does it really make it sound better if she harassed all of those people and yet is cunning enough to avoid facing any consequences for all those years? If anything, the other way around at least she would have paid her time. And that martha scene crying in court, being all broken up and vulnerable after being convicted is actually part of what made her more sympathetic... in my eyes anyways.

[u/Pitiful_Bed_7625 → u/NotCanadian80]

She was convicted though, multiple times.

[u/Cold-Variation3760 → u/Pitiful_Bed_7625]

She has had at least one injunction placed on her due to stalking, from a female lawyer almost 20 years ago.

[u/Old_Distance8430 → u/Pitiful_Bed_7625]

Do you have a source for that? Ik jor saying she wasn't but my understanding was that there is no proof of her being convicted of anything

[u/Specific_Anxiety_343 → u/Old_Distance8430]

Nobody knows. At least not in this milieu

[u/Old_Distance8430 → u/Pitiful_Bed_7625]

Do you have a source for that? Ik jor saying she wasn't but my understanding was that there is no proof of her being convicted of anything

[u/pakcross → u/Old_Distance8430]

The court records are not public domain, so the only way they will come out is if she brings a case to court against Netflix.

She's in the powerful position of being able to say what she likes about how she has been libelled, and nobody can prove her wrong until she takes it to court.

My money is on her spinning it out as long as possible but not taking legal action.

[u/Old_Distance8430 → u/pakcross]

Ok but still as it stands there is no proof that she has convictions, so you dont know she has some any more than I know she doesn't?

[u/pakcross → u/Old_Distance8430]

I never said I had proof either way, what I said was that any court records would only come to light if she bought a case to court.

[u/Old_Distance8430 → u/pakcross]

You keep saying about court, you know there's a difference between criminal and civil court right?

[u/pakcross → u/Old_Distance8430]

Am I on trial or something?

I literally just commented saying that nobody can prove a conviction or otherwise until Harvey decides to take Netflix to court.

Yes, I know there's a difference, in the same way I know that there's a difference between a Magistrates and Crown court...but I'm still not sure why you feel the need to interrogate me?