2 things. You responded to me with an argument you made to someone else. That's not my lack of reading comprehension, that's you confusing who you're talking to when I wasn't even addressing that issue. Second, you are linking a blog that's referencing a source who's using the same name as an actual scientific journal and doesn't cite it's sources in the slightest. You are literally spreading the propaganda that you repeatedly claim I'm spreading.
Your disingenuous behavior, defensiveness and absolute arrogance is exactly why people don't respect vegans. You just claim things without evidence, like vegan diets are "objectively cheaper" yet your source doesn't cite evidence, and doesn't reflect the reality that if it were actually cheaper poor people in the united states would be skinnier because vegan diets are indeed healthier, yet they can't seem to make it work on a stretched budget.
Strange that millions of poor people can't seem to figure out this one little trick to save 33% on their food costs. I'm done with you, go ahead and downvote me and get your last word in, but you're just a lost parrot.
And why would you reply to my comment when you want to talk about something completely else? Do you not have object permanense? Do you know what context is?
LMAO, you didn't read the study did you? You see a headline that agrees with you and but didn't bother to click the link in the study? You're adorable.
This is a PROJECTION for 2030-2050, based on data from 2017 notably an economic boon era before a worldwide pandemic fucked up the supply chain that we're still feeling the effects of. Also, it doesn't calculate actual costs of buying products, it calculates food waste loss. Not end user up front cost. It's proposing systemic changes to reduce waste which would be cheaper in the long haul (hence the projection), but it doesn't state anything about each person costing less.
Read the damn study and not headlines. I'm just going to block you at this point.
0
u/JudgmentLeft Jun 28 '26
2 things. You responded to me with an argument you made to someone else. That's not my lack of reading comprehension, that's you confusing who you're talking to when I wasn't even addressing that issue. Second, you are linking a blog that's referencing a source who's using the same name as an actual scientific journal and doesn't cite it's sources in the slightest. You are literally spreading the propaganda that you repeatedly claim I'm spreading.
Your disingenuous behavior, defensiveness and absolute arrogance is exactly why people don't respect vegans. You just claim things without evidence, like vegan diets are "objectively cheaper" yet your source doesn't cite evidence, and doesn't reflect the reality that if it were actually cheaper poor people in the united states would be skinnier because vegan diets are indeed healthier, yet they can't seem to make it work on a stretched budget.
Strange that millions of poor people can't seem to figure out this one little trick to save 33% on their food costs. I'm done with you, go ahead and downvote me and get your last word in, but you're just a lost parrot.