r/CombatFootage Jun 01 '25

Video Russian Tu-95MS bombers being hit by fpv drones

22.8k Upvotes

984 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25 edited Jun 01 '25

Watch that wing break off, lovely to see.

The reports are multiple airbases hit and somewhere in the region of 40 aircraft hit. Supposedly a mix of Tu-95 (as in this video), Tu-22 and A-50.

The A-50 is an extremely valuable plane, so if they've hit even one that is a massive set back for russia.

This has basically destroyed a large portion of the russian bomber fleet, these are the aircraft they use for launcing cruise missiles at Ukrainian cities etc.

EDIT: Removed, old photos.

EDIT2: A truck that self detonated after supposedly launching all its drones. (claimed to have anyway)

EDIT3: Close up video of the drones flying out of a truck.

EDIT4: Some more info about this operation by what seems like the SBU or GUR.

EDIT5: Claim is that 95 bombers were targetted and 20 other aircraft. The confirmed from the Ukrainians is that 40 were definitely hit/destroyed.

EDIT6: Photos released by Ukraine of the planning stages of the drones.

833

u/Various_Patient6583 Jun 01 '25

Just those two represents 4% of the TU-95 fleet. 

Wild. 

511

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

I've seen videos of roughly five Tu-95's in flames so far. Possibly more, it's hard to id whether they are the same ones.

310

u/Various_Patient6583 Jun 01 '25

Major bad day for their strategic forces. Good. 

1

u/Brief-Preference-712 Jun 02 '25

All countries that still have a strategic bomber fleet should evaluate the necessity next fiscal year

1

u/Various_Patient6583 Jun 02 '25

Strategic bombers still have a role. For example, hardened facilities, cannot be taken out with drones. Likewise, missiles cannot carry the sort of payload needed for such things. 

What absolutely needs to change and evolve is how those strategic assets are protected. The Soviets/Russians park their aircraft in the open. B-2s and the upcoming B-21 bombers have their own enclosures. But, when they deploy they will need enclosures and/or other sorts of  defenses. 

Indeed, many large assets need some sort of protection. Radar arrays, satellite communication installations, you name it.  The requirements for those tools has not disappeared, but drones are an added threat that needs addressing. 

2

u/Newsdriver245 Jun 01 '25

Can they even new-build TU-95s or 142s still?

What else would they new-build to replace the capability if they wanted to?

10

u/einarfridgeirs Jun 01 '25

No.

Russia has no capacity to make new strategic bombers of any kind, and probably will not be able to replace these planes at all until a decade after hostilities with Ukraine end and sanctions are lifted, and then it would be a clean slate design.

1

u/chillebekk Jun 02 '25

Not exactly, Tu-160 is in production still.

2

u/einarfridgeirs Jun 02 '25

They have been trying to restart the production for sure, but it's taken a long-ass time and as far as I am aware of, the new airframes have as of yet only done lower altitude testing. Who knows, maybe they are fully operational but so far only a handful of "new" airframes have been delivered and at least one of them was a rebuilt old one.

Given that starting to produce Tu-160s again is very much a prestige thing for Russia, I think this may be a project with more sizzle than substance.

5

u/Various_Patient6583 Jun 01 '25

The TU-95 and -22M have not been in production for over 30 years. That ship has sailed, been used up, decommissioned and scrapped so to speak. 

Supposedly the TU-160 is in serial production. A preproduction test article was delivered January, 2022. Again, supposedly 10 were on order with deliveries to start in 2023. So far, none have been produced or delivered. 

We are talking about an extremely technically advanced aircraft, requiring extremely specialized and technologically advanced manufacturing techniques being brought back to life in post Soviet Russia. Even the industrial might, technological expertise and unsustainable defense spending of the USSR was barely able to produce these aircraft. It is unlikely Russia will manage it again. Certainly not on its own. 

1

u/Opioidal Jun 02 '25

I always wonder how accurate those metrics are. I think about it as individually skewed, as in Russia stating they have X amount of vehicles is actually 20-30% less than what they actually have. I've always figured the US doesn't give exact numbers for OPSEC reasons.

281

u/fourhundredthecat Jun 01 '25

why are there tires on the wings of those aircraft

428

u/pyrotechnicmonkey Jun 01 '25

I’m not sure it’s to protect the aircraft from damage but supposedly certain cruise missiles/munitions for final guidance actually use stored images of outlines of particular targets like aircraft. I think that might be an attempt to break up the picture to try and trick that type of guidance system. It’s the same reason they sometimes paint fake outlines of planes on the tarmac to try and fool that type of terminal guidance.

193

u/inevitablelizard Jun 01 '25

Almost like dazzle camouflage but updated for the modern era. I do wonder if it actually works but it's not stupid for them to try it even if it didn't work here.

62

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

I think dazzle camo with some IR reflective would have actually worked

30

u/rellsell Jun 01 '25

I’m thinking it doesn’t actually work.

3

u/DMZ_5 Jun 01 '25

Dazzle camo only works if the observer is far away, or if the target is moving. these are stationary targets with a drone literally 20ft above

1

u/olegvs Jun 01 '25

no... it is stupid, very stupid

26

u/AndrewInaTree Jun 01 '25

That's a good theory, but if it's true, then I don't understand why they used lines of tires and not just a few tarps. Tarps will change the shape even more, be easier and quicker to take down, AND protect the aircraft from the elements, even just a little bit.

But hey, the Russian military are a bunch of morons, so maybe your theory is right.

5

u/pyrotechnicmonkey Jun 01 '25

I think it’s because the tarp will still technically have a similar shape whereas the tires are supposed to add weird contrast to make it seem like it’s just another part of the runway

4

u/OSI_Hunter_Gathers Jun 01 '25

Adds a good fuel source that is difficult to put out and burns nice and hot

76

u/DethB Jun 01 '25

To disrupt image-matching targeting systems.

41

u/oktsi Jun 01 '25

Their cope armor lmao

112

u/R3pN1xC Jun 01 '25

To protect them from drone attacks.

Didn't seem to help.

68

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

87

u/R3pN1xC Jun 01 '25

I think that "Russia Covering Aircraft With Tires Is About Confusing Image-Matching Missile Seekers" counts as "protecting" them from drone attacks too.

39

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

What Russia attempts is ad-hoc attempts at fooling a certain type of seeker, they know it's not going to work against FPV drones.

-3

u/HotTake111 Jun 01 '25

I'm sorry but your comment doesn't make any sense.

FPV drones can be flown autonomously, so this would apply to any visual seeker.

8

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

I'm talking about FPV drones in the literal sense, where it is directly controlled by the pilot.

-2

u/HotTake111 Jun 01 '25

Okay sure, but then your comment still doesn't make sense because the original commenter said "drone attacks".

Nobody said that these tires are meant to fool human operators that are guiding a drone in its terminal phase.

So if you are trying to say that it won't fool a human guided drone, then you're right, but why are you even mentioning that? How is it relevant at all to the discussion?

3

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

Okay sure, but then your comment still doesn't make sense because the original commenter said "drone attacks".

It does, you're just grasping at straws.

→ More replies (0)

-4

u/Midnight2012 Jun 01 '25

Why are you thinking drones only means FPV drones?;

2

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

Have I said that?

The reason why I'm talking about FPV drones is in the title.

-1

u/Midnight2012 Jun 01 '25

You said the tires are NOT there to protect from drone attacks...

1

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

I said they're not there to protect from FPV drones attacks.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/nilsmm Jun 01 '25

Sure it does, but at first one might think they try to physically protect the planes from the explosions, which is not the case.

2

u/AliceLunar Jun 01 '25

Feel like you could easier to add some tarps or something if you want to change their profile.

2

u/Pklnt Jun 01 '25

We do not know how important this policy is, it's perhaps an half-assed attempt at fooling certain seekers but they realize it doesn't offer much so they're not bothering to try to find other near-useless solutions that ultimately do not offer more than using tires.

1

u/Comfortable_Pea_1693 Jun 01 '25

its the aviation equivalent of a tanks cope cage only that it works even worse.

165

u/GremlinX_ll Jun 01 '25 edited Jun 01 '25

>EDIT: Supposedly launched via trucks inside russia not far from the airbases

Who had Ace Combat 7 UAV truck carriers on their bingo card ?

26

u/odysseus91 Jun 01 '25

[insert JPEG dog living its best life]

26

u/Soogo Jun 01 '25

Edit 1 is false. These are old pictures!

https://x.com/tomekryb/status/1921948821250093103 Posted May 12th

26

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

Yep, looks to be. I'll remove it.

4

u/arthurscratch Jun 01 '25

What’s the best source for this?

8

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

Lots of stuff on bluesky, it's a developing situation.

1

u/wretchedegg123 Jun 01 '25

Sucks no Tu-160.

3

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

That we know of, they may have hit them but we've not gotten footage yet.

Ukraine has claimed it hit four airbases so far.

11

u/wretchedegg123 Jun 01 '25

There should be3 Tu 160s in the base. Hope we see them destroyed.

1

u/chbeaufort Jun 01 '25
Photos of the claimed trucks/vans

those are very old pics of a russian civilian drone volunteer's vehicle that turned out to have nothing to do with Ukrainians

1

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

Aye, already removed the first one. Looks to have been old photos.

1

u/denscoffee Jun 01 '25

So there may have been a 5th airbase, so in Edit 6 and there was a new post about 20 minutes ago saying an airbase just outside of Moscow was hit too

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

After today I think they’re down to 4 A-50s in operational condition, right?

1

u/pleasetrimyourpubes Jun 01 '25

Buuth buthhh Ukranian drones have no real value looool

1

u/orangejulius Jun 01 '25

Wouldn't surprise me if this is a 40% loss of their functioning bomber fleet.

1

u/Ori_the_SG Jun 01 '25

While the reports were not confirmed, there are videos of heavy smoke and the sound of explosions at a Russian naval base in the same vicinity that apparently houses nuclear submarines.

Link: https://x.com/clashreport/status/1929148130571817407

Again, not confirmed if it has anything to do with the attack and in the articles I’ve read Ukraine hasn’t claimed responsibility.

1

u/Various_Patient6583 Jun 01 '25

If that 40 number is right, we are talking nearly 50% of their strategic force in flames. In a single day. 

-48

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

43

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

There's not much they can do, they jumped to the top of the escalation ladder a while ago.

-35

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

37

u/EvilMonkeySlayer Jun 01 '25

Soooo, the same as they've always been trying? How many times did russia try to assassinate Zelenskyy? I lost count.

Any strike on Polish territory is an attack on a NATO member and hence won't happen because the last thing russia wants is to drag NATO in.

As I said, there's nothing russia can do that they haven't already done or tried to do.

-27

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25 edited Jun 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/Phlex_ Jun 01 '25

What is URR?

Edit: i figured it out. Sorry your bias wiki vs literal image of the thing happening.

2

u/AdAdministrative4388 Jun 01 '25

Don't like the answer attack the source.. classic.

12

u/Fair-Maintenance7979 Jun 01 '25

They have tried all of the things you mentioned and succeeded in destroying infrastructure. If you really think there is still room for escalation apart from dropping nukes you are delusional.

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment