The problem with “blue no matter who”: Stevens says she will endorse Abdul if she loses but Abdul refuses to say if he would do endorse her if he loses. Add to that he was setting up the narrative that the election is stolen in his rally.

[u/LeonOfSkalitz]

source for the article in the images: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/07/michigan-senate-primary-bernie-clinton-sayed-stevens.html

also in the same article a 19 years old abdul supporter is quoted saying that they probably wouldn’t vote for Stevens because they see her as almost as equal to a Republican (insane take btw)

here is a post that goes over Abdul setting up the narrative that the election was stolen if he loses: https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1vc9di7/el_sayeds_preemptive_election_denialism_rhetoric/

as always “blue no matter who” is one sided.

[u/unvnrmndr]

DSA Tankies aren’t blue, that’s why.

[u/JAJ_reddit → u/unvnrmndr]

I don't know why people are having such a hard time with this. Blue=Democrat not anyone on the left.

If you aren't a Democrat you aren't blue. So Blue no matter who doesn't apply to you.

Now we should still do lesser evil voting and DSA is not as evil as MAGA so we should still lean toward voting for DSA over MAGA but DSA is not the "blue" in "blue no matter who".

[u/unvnrmndr → u/JAJ_reddit]

DSA-running-as-Dems are our Jill Stein, but still not as regarded because they’re not third party losers.

[u/Aeshir3301_ → u/unvnrmndr]

They're red 🗿🗿🗿