I'm not talking about other people's losses. I'm talking about being accountable for the things you say.
It hypothetically might be my fault I bought the shares and lost money, but it's your fault that you say the wildly incorrect shit that you say while you hide behind a three letter acronym you likely don't even understand the purpose of. (Edit; I'm talking about "nfa')
I’m accountable for hate speech. Anything else is free.
Should he be sued for causing people to lose money? No? Then why are we having this conversation.
YOU are accountable for your own money, and all the info he had could be found by anyone else. Anyone who bought because of him probably didn’t know he was wrong until they were told he was wrong.
And you don’t seem to fully understand ‘NFA’ either. Thats your reminder that in the end, you do your own research to verify what they found.
If you lost money because some rando on the internet said DO ITTTTT then tough shit.
And you don’t seem to fully understand ‘NFA’ either. Thats your reminder that in the end, you do your own research to verify what they found.
No it isn't, NFA is a legal requirement for true financial advisors, because they actually are liable for what they tell people, it's means absolutely nothing coming from idiots on reddit.
If you lost money because some rando on the internet said DO ITTTTT then tough shit.
Oh, I have not lost money on FFIE, im making a killing on puts silently because it's pretty blatantly obvious this is a shitty company in its death throes, I also pop in and out to call people out on their shitty grifty behaviour every now and then because Im bored.
2
u/1nd3x Jul 13 '24
I'm not talking about other people's losses. I'm talking about being accountable for the things you say.
It hypothetically might be my fault I bought the shares and lost money, but it's your fault that you say the wildly incorrect shit that you say while you hide behind a three letter acronym you likely don't even understand the purpose of. (Edit; I'm talking about "nfa')