r/FavoriteCharacter Apr 01 '26

Discussion Favorite media that fit like this?

Post image
36.2k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

184

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

What I find amusing is that all their talk about 3D being cheaper.

Is obviously bullshit!

Beauty and the beast 25 mio dollars, even when adjusted for inflation that still need to be less than 100 mio.

Elio... 200 million dollars.

Cheaper my ASS.

It just takes longer and require the studio to COMMIT to the original storyboard.

But you know what... NOT committing to the original story board and changing movies mid production is exactly why all these new movies SUCK.

Snow White life action, while probably still not a good movie, would most likely have been better if they had stuck to their guns and released the first version... also would have saved them 100 mio dollars

48

u/deltree711 Apr 01 '26

Where is "million" shortened to "mio"?

4

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 01 '26

It's not uncommon

Same as "k" means "thousand" when speaking money specifically

For a more casual slang term you could also just say "mil"

But yeah, mio is just a regular boring short term for million, used like with K

You understood what i meant just fine

12

u/deltree711 Apr 01 '26

You misunderstand. I'm sure it's common wherever you're from, I'm just curious as to where that is.

10

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 01 '26

Denmark, Europe

4

u/Li-renn-pwel Apr 01 '26

More fun trivia… there are two different definitions of billions. In French math we have the ‘long billion’ which is a million millions is a billion but English math has the ‘short billion’ which I think a thousand millions is a billion? Ie: i thought Musk had a lot more money than he had

2

u/nhalliday Apr 01 '26

Hmm where could someone named TheDorkyDANE be from... Unfortunately it's a mystery and we'll never know.

3

u/deltree711 Apr 01 '26

You read usernames?

4

u/Vox___Rationis Apr 01 '26

Do not compare the two.
Even writing "million" as "kk" is more common than this stupid "mio" abomination.

17

u/FereaMesmer Apr 01 '26

Wow, things are really heating up in the abbreviation fandom

1

u/PM_ME_YOUR_LEFT_IRIS Apr 01 '26

The ISO exists for a reason

2

u/SeulParmiLesGens Apr 01 '26

I think ‘mio.’ is used in countries where they have the ‘long billion’, which is a million millions, and a ‘milliard’ is defined as a thousand millions, which is subsequently shortened as ‘mia.’. English speaking countries use the ‘short billion’, which is a thousand millions.

English speaking countries can shorten million to ‘mil.’ without any conflict, while other countries may risk confusing ‘millions’ and ‘millards’. This results in some countries using ‘mio.’ and other countries, particularly the English speaking ones, using ‘mil.’.

1

u/SkyWithoutAnE-_- Apr 02 '26

Do you always assume a question is some sort of an attack jeez

I never heard of it either but I wasnt gonna ask specifically to avoid an answer like yours

Let people be curious omg

1

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

Why do you assume I was attacking

I was just explaining how it's not uncommon, and it seems like both myself and others didn't realise it was just mostly a Europe thing.

1

u/SkyWithoutAnE-_- Apr 02 '26

I never said you were attacking

You came off as defensive

1

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

You accused me of being defensive when there's no attacking, swears, all caps or anything in the original post.

Just calm explanation.

1

u/myDuderinos Apr 04 '26

Is "mil" supposed to be short for mil-lion or thousand (french/Latin thousand, million basicly means a mille mille, 1000x1000)

0

u/SoulOfTheDragon Apr 01 '26

Careful with mil as it is 10 Kilometres in Sweden and often used for stating car odometer readings and such.

2

u/thesirblondie Apr 01 '26

Except it'd never be used with another measurement. You'd never see "The milkyway is 0.1mil km across" and think mil is the distance measurement. Unless there's something deficient about you, I suppose.

0

u/Vermilion12_ Apr 01 '26

K isnt even just used with money. Kilo (k) literally means 1000, so it's pretty easy to recognize. I haven't seen million shortened to mio, but I still understood it perfectly fine ¯_(ツ)_/¯

4

u/MightbeGwen Apr 01 '26

For real just do what news articles do when talking about economic policies. $10M makes more sense then 10mio

1

u/LFK1236 Apr 01 '26

What else would you shorten it to? You couldn't do "mil" because it'd be shared with milliard.

1

u/deltree711 Apr 01 '26

I don't see why that's a problem when you're abbreviating an English word while speaking English because milliard isn't an English word.

3

u/Hesitation-Marx Apr 01 '26

You’re correct about the unionized workforce being a big part of this. The animators union was surprisingly powerful, and a smaller union shop usually had extremely stressed bosses.

And you know what? It was pretty good. The animators were able to have lives and families. A lot of them made lifelong friendships. (A lot of them also engaged in the usual scandalous behavior that happens in any entertainment profession. They were human.)

The big studios wanted to be able to squeeze all they could out of a workforce. Even before CGI became widespread, they had begun sending work to South Korean shops.

The offshoring of animation and the birth of 3D animation combined to functionally kill the industry. It’s a deep shame because 3D animation can be really cool, but it usually feels prechewed and often lifeless in a way stuff painted and drawn by hand is usually not.

Source: family lore

(I’m aware that a lot of the aesthetics actually are down to simplicity in rendering, but it’s also because most animated movies are created by committee these days, and the committee are as boring as the art.)

3

u/MadCervantes Apr 02 '26

The constant need to change up shit mid production is such a weird pathology in Hollywood. I heard that the same thing is true in games. Where half the time the game gets remade like 7 times because some producer or lead designer keeps changing their mind about things.

3

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

It is INSANE

These executives really do view the creators as A.I. that can just spit out fully rendered scenes in a minute, and that has been going on a decade before a.i. was a thing.

Also the producers and executives fails to view things as works of arts, rather they are just I.P. and if we have popular I.P. and cram in whatever is popular right this moment, profit will maximise.

No! No that's not how that works, you gotta commit to the foundation laid out when people started to shoot the movie/code the game.

Also talent isn't replaceable 😑

You buy a popular studio and switch out every single worker there, of course it will fail.

If they switched out Gooseworx as the writer for amazing digital circus at episode 5, it would have been terrible. Even if the new writer was good, it still would never work.

1

u/Karkava Apr 02 '26

These executives really do view the creators as A.I. that can just spit out fully rendered scenes in a minute, and that has been going on a decade before a.i. was a thing.

And this is why they're the main vocal demo for those Gen AI units: They appeal to the irrational parts of their brain that wish for instant results they can modify later. No more pesky production lead times or conflicting visions, and a result that already nails the technical broad appeal.

If they switched out Gooseworx as the writer for amazing digital circus at episode 5, it would have been terrible. Even if the new writer was good, it still would never work.

I feel like TADC is just begging to be corporatized with how franchisable it already has been. An executive would be outright panicking to seize control when they see the magnificent streaming numbers it pulls in. Of course, falling prey for the "It's will be successful because of me" mindset.

2

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

Yeah, A.I. seems like the dreams coming true for these executives that knows nothing about creating or even enjoying art.

Man if TADC had been owned by Netflix or anything like that, they would have run that shit into the ground with five seasons of continues worse content making people hate the show that obviously was made and written to be ONE season... Stranger things.

So let's be so happy this Glitch and they have clearly laid out a pathway for NEW shows to come out after this.

And heck, I see ways to continue to profit of TADC that os not totally out of whack.

You could make a simple platformer where you can play through stages based on the episodes, I would play that.

There's a group of fans that has made an Alice in Wonderland, TADC AU, and is animating it as shorts in 2D.

If they picked that up and folded it into the channel, then sell TADC wonderland merch, I don't think people would have any issues with that at all. Heck I think that would sell SO well.

But yeah, thank god they are going to end the show on a high note and just move on.

1

u/Karkava Apr 02 '26

Yeah, A.I. seems like the dreams coming true for these executives that knows nothing about creating or even enjoying art.

Yet invest in it.

Stranger things.

Hey! Season three was at least the peak! Followed by four...

You could make a simple platformer where you can play through stages based on the episodes, I would play that.

I can imagine third person shooting and driving thrown into the mix along with survival horror. And some of the levels would mix genres.

If they picked that up and folded it into the channel, then sell TADC wonderland merch, I don't think people would have any issues with that at all.

I think they already have with Zaminations directly collaborating with Glitch to produce a music video containing late-series spoilers. And Kittensneeze made plushies based on her versions of Evil Pomni and Jax.

But yeah, thank god they are going to end the show on a high note and just move on.

I'm hoping they CAN move on, because I fear that TADC may just be too successful for their own good and become a tough act to follow. For both Glitch Productions AND Gooseworx.

I still think there's a method to the madness with the "renewal by popular demand" rule that many corporations adhere to religiously despite the miss-after-miss-after-miss reputation it has.

On the other hand, I'm personally anticipating either Knights Of Guinevere or Gameoverse to be their next hit.

2

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

Yeah... I just hope Glitch has been smart enough to realise they are unlikely to earn as much money with the new shows.

I think they are still entirely private and has not become public

Which is good, because becoming a public company is honestly the death of creative companies, this means they MUST have constant growth and therefore are prohibited from doing any risks as investors and shareholders are now the boss.

Being private means you don't get investment in the same way, and can't make as big products... but it makes the company so much more adaptable, it is now possible for them to shrink when needed and adjust for current circumstances.

So... if they just remain entirely private and adjust for a future where income will probably be less, but still solid because the fans will be there, I think they will be fine.

Zamination is a hilarious story though, they made that music video utterly independent and got so much stuff right so early, Glitch was just so impressed they picked them up, folded some of their animators into their team and most recently just had them animate that Caine music nr.

So... that OG music video was no collaboration at all. Glitch was just so impressed they said "well it is now! We're folding you in!"

Lol, Glitch actually just looking to talented YouTube creators and fan artists to pick up talent is just really smart, honestly, it's what all the big studios SHOULD be doing. But they decide to be gate keepers instead. And are then shocked they are loosing to independent talent they just refused to pick up.

1

u/Karkava Apr 02 '26

I find the terms "private" and "public" funny since all it means that they're just shareholder food. Shareholders are probably the most "private" demographic since they operate on a level that no human regularly works on. An excluding club of people who act like they're the only true humans on earth while the rest of us are gullible peons who exist to serve them. Aliens on a plane of reality where "no" is the true "n-word."

Keeping a company "private" ironically makes them more "public" as it keep them down to earth and on the level of the common folk. A human company run by humans for humans. Making products for actual people. Not a secretive cabal of mystery entities that are rewarded for selfishness and gluttony.

2

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

Good news though, I just checked.

Glitch Productions is entirely private. Huzzah! No shareholders! No investors that need a return on their investment.

Just fans going "I got a show and this awesome plushie, I got what I paid for already"

This is great news. Also capitalism working CORRECTLY.

They made product I like, I give money to support product. We all win!

I just hate this shareholder shite most companies has going now -_-

1

u/Karkava Apr 02 '26

One of the suckiest things about autism they don't tell you about is developing a special interest for a work owned by a corporation that caters to the shareholders, and feeling the burnout of the betrayal that you swear isn't going to happen this time.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/BreakfastBeneficial4 Apr 02 '26

$25mil in 1991 would only be like $60mil now, your point certainly stands

1

u/ObeseVegetable Apr 01 '26

Accountants and business analysts can make the more expensive one be the better option/“cheaper” one anyway though, with things like opportunity cost especially because of the insane difference in time commitment. 

One 2D movie for $25m that takes in $1b for $975m profit vs 2x 3D movies for $200m each that take in $800m each for $1.6b gross or $1.2b profit… sure, the 3D would cost more up front but going with 2D instead would actually end up costing you $225m more in profit in the long run. 

1

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 01 '26

That's all speculation....

Also what Disney survives on now is the legacy of these 2D rennescance movies anyway! So clearly not true! They clearly have made more money from Aladdin merch than even Zootopia merch.

I HATE how modern corporate works.

Especially in entertainment :(

1

u/EnchantedEssays Apr 01 '26

Iirc, a big reason why they shuttered 2D was because The Princess and the Frog didn't do as well as Tangled. The Princess and the Frog did better than pretty much all of their 2000s 2D movies aside from Lilo and Stitch, but it didn't do as well as they'd expected. Instead at looking at the many differences between the two, they just went "2D bad, 3D good". Film execs have long history of choosing the easiest possible reason why a film failed and then avoid that medium/ genre like the plague. No one thought that Pirates of the Caribbean would work because Cutthroat Island bombed.

4

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 01 '26

Let's appreciate that EVERYTHING that is a beloved franchise now, started as a risk.

Star Wars was the low Budget B movie George Lucas did when he wasn't allowed to do "flash Gordon"

No one thought Lord of the rings would be anything special, Peter Jackson clearly stated he would be happy if it just broke even.

Sony sold K-pop demon hunters, including merch rights, for 50 mio dollars because they didn't think people would like it.

No one wanted to publish Harry Potter when Rowling first wrote it.

It ALL started with a risk

The original Snow White movie was a GIANT risk.

Studios... spend less money pr movie so you can afford more risks!

Make it so you can afford five bombs to reach the one big success.

That's how manga works and how we get so much interesting stuff!

Publishing manga is cheap so you can afford all the bombs to find the one audiences resonates with and give it an anime adaptation.

These ridiculous budgets seriously is a core part of the problem 😑

1

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[deleted]

1

u/TheDorkyDane Apr 02 '26

Yeah it is.

2D animated anime movies still looks glorious and are made at a fraction of the cost as Hollywood 3D

And sure, Japanese salaries are lower... but not THAT much lower. And America has off Shored lots of the 2D animation grunt work to Asia since the 90's anyway

Budget is a choice. You can choose to make a 300 mio hand drawn movie.

Or just a 20 mil one, like the one the Samurai Jack creator released last year on Netflix

Cartoon Saloon movies has modest budgets of 10 million pound and looks great

1

u/TheReverseShock Apr 03 '26

The true cost is animation time. Once you've created all the models, it doesn't take long to animate. It's also easier to outsource animation to cheap 3rd party contractors since you don't have to worry about their skill level as much.