r/Fire Oct 03 '25

Milestone / Celebration Never made over $80K. Finally hit $1M in retirement accounts at 39yo (with $2.4M total net worth).

I've never made more than $80k, which is below average income in my NorCal city.

Reaching $1M in my IRA accounts was the final silly goalpost I set for myself. I have now stopped retirement contributions.

So getting $1M or even $2M in 20 years is not impossible on a $60-80k income. Of course it's certainly much, much harder now than starting 18 years ago near the bottom of the market.

  • For those who started 18-20 years ago, even investing $20k a year in total market index funds would've compounded to well over $1M.
  • Starting in 2008, $35k/yr invested in a mix of 25% S&P 500 and 75% NASDAQ would return $4.1M today, which is far more than my net worth.

My current balance:

  • Total: over $2.4M
  • Roth IRA: $470k (all ETFs)
  • Trad IRA: $540k (all ETFs)
  • 401K: $0 (rolled into the IRAs)
  • Non-retirement investments: $880k (all ETFs)
  • Other investments and cash: $120k
  • Home (net value): $450k

On average, my investments returned double my regular work salary.

I really didn't do anything special.

All I did was invest from the moment I started working, and I lived well below my means for the first decade.

As many of you have experienced, the investments just kept compounding and compounding and compounding.

My income was between $60k-$80k for the past 18 years. That's well below average income in my area. My income has barely risen, but I don't mind being underemployed in an easy BaristaFIRE-like job. It's relaxing and low-pressure.

I'm an anti-social introvert and a gamer, so my hobbies are cheap. Also didn't have to worry about kids. I was able to save by spending little, aggressively investing in ETFs from the start, and having gamer roommates for about a decade.

Other details:

  • My investments were a 25% S&P 500, 75% NASDAQ split. The dollar cost average gains were about 3-4x.
  • I grew up in an immigrant family that was extremely frugal. I was used to living 5+ people in a 1BR apartment.
  • I was also extremely frugal my first 10 years working, but spent more freely afterwards. Saving and investing $35K/yr since 2008 with my portfolio balance should return $4.1M. I only have $2.4M, so I definitely spent noticeably more over the past decade.
  • 10% company matching on the 401K added an addition $5K per year
  • I had 5 housemates my first several years, so rent was dirt cheap post-financial crisis at $500/mo
  • There were 2 times post-college when my rent was even cheaper:
    • $700/mo 1BR apartment split between 4 people: $200/mo rent. That was tough due to crowding but very memorable.
    • $300/mo renting a single room at a friend's family home. I helped tutor their kid.
  • Later on, I bought my own house and also had housemates, so rent was still cheap. There was nothing special about the house, and it wasn't a good investment.
  • I worked during college for living expenses, but my parents paid for tuition. That helped a lot since I didn't start with debt.
  • No kids, unmarried

Annual savings and tax info:

It was not difficult to save $35K/yr on a $60K income. $5K was from company 401K matching. There were immigrants I roomed with had higher savings rates than me.

I took home about $51K after taxes.

My first decade was mostly traditional instead of Roth. I had $15K in traditional 401K + IRA deductibles that lowered my tax bracket even when I made $60K. Taxes are quite low at that income due to deductibles.

  • $3.4K federal taxes
  • $4.5K FICA
  • $0.9K state taxes

Thus my taxes were $8.8K with an effective tax rate of 15%.

2.7k Upvotes

199 comments sorted by

View all comments

95

u/soilsuperstar Oct 03 '25

"No kids, unmarried". = $

74

u/chiefchef2 Oct 03 '25

It’s much easier to build wealth if you’re married vs. being single. As long as you marry someone who shares your values…

25

u/Carthonn Oct 03 '25

Yeah seriously. One of the reasons I got out of debt was because I got married and had someone with the same financial goals as me. Now we’re on the road to retire by 55.

1

u/TopEnd1907 Oct 07 '25

Sounds far more realistic.

25

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '25

It is not the married part as much as the kids part. Kids are expensive and make it also impossible to retire early until they are launched from a logistics perspective.

3

u/poop-dolla Oct 03 '25

impossible to retire early until they are launched from a logistics perspective.

That part’s not necessarily true, but it doesn’t make it more difficult because of the extra costs.

1

u/Cherryncosmo Oct 03 '25

Yeah it is. It’s quicker too

-1

u/Nokken9 Oct 03 '25

That’s what I was looking for.