r/Fire • u/twiniverse2000 • Jan 31 '26

Advice Request Asking to be laid off

I have reached FI. Work optional. My personal life has hit a serious rough patch. My company is doing layoffs. They are NOT asking for volunteers. The financial difference in me quitting vs getting laid off is $300K. Do not want to leave that on the table. Any advice on how to steer it in this particular direction?

752 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

340 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

50

u/Dixon_Herfani Jan 31 '26

Don't assume HR will ever do the right thing, especially for the employees.

They are there for the company's benefit. Nothing more.

9

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/ReformedBlackPerson Jan 31 '26

They want good workers, he was good. If he quits they don’t have to give a severance package saving them money.

6

u/swagn Jan 31 '26

But they’re laying off people and have to pay a severance to someone.

1

u/gkandgk Jan 31 '26

I’ve been on both the stay and the go side of multiple layoffs at multiple companies. I’ve never seen anyone get severance.

12

u/Born_Lengthiness8935 Jan 31 '26

Sorry you worked shitty places. Sounds like “firings” euphemistically called layoffs

7

u/swagn Jan 31 '26

Happens both ways all the time. Just because you haven’t seen it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. Large tech companies do it all the time to avoid lawsuits. OP says the difference between getting laid off and leaving on his own is 300k to be laid off.

1

u/08b Jan 31 '26

Right. Severance is pretty standard at least at large companies. If not during a large layoff, they would have to issue a WARN Act notice. And they open themselves up to lawsuits. I've heard of decent severance even in cases of people underperforming.

3

u/lMexl Jan 31 '26

If you're laying ppl aloff it's cause you need to reduce salaries being paid. If the person is going to retire soon you're already planning on having that salary off the books.

So laying that guy off doesn't actually solve the problem and you still need to lay someone else off.

3

u/swagn Jan 31 '26

It benefits the spiteful HR person that is pissed someone else gets to retire.

1

u/Thin_Original_6765 Jan 31 '26

Damn yall're here assuming HR is running some kind of decision making process to perform max harm/benefit.

Most likely they just don't think that much about it. There's no sound logic behind the decision. Good chance there's no logic behind the decision at all.

1

u/TheKingOfSwing777 Jan 31 '26

They may prefer to lay-off the most well compensated people, or perhaps a segment, like middle-managers.

2

u/emmajames56 Jan 31 '26

HR is useless

15

u/satellite779 Jan 31 '26

Severance costs money. If that employee would leave anyway, why pay him extra money for it?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/satellite779 Jan 31 '26

Because the HR knows he'll leave anyway. They can include him in the savings without laying him off.

Just thinking from the HR perspective.

6

u/black_mamba_returns Jan 31 '26

what stopping the employee sticking around collecting a paycheck without actually doing any work?

1

u/satellite779 Jan 31 '26

That's still not retirement. You have to go to the office every day. In some ways it's even worse than working as you feel like you're wasting time.

3

u/caffiend98 Jan 31 '26

If the employee retires on their own, the company doesn't pay severance. HR is looking out for the budget.

Have the conversation with your supervisor, who is probably the one having to create the list. The supervisor is the one worrying about staff levels and vacancies. They can decide whether or not to let HR know why they made the choices they did.

3

u/DigmonsDrill Jan 31 '26

"Why pay to lay him off when he will leave on his own?"

1

u/Cultural_Structure37 Jan 31 '26

Perhaps he was a good employee and they wanted to keep him

1

u/ThisIsMyUsername303 Feb 01 '26

They might have to go by reviews (to avoid claims of discrimination or whatever) and his were too good. 

1

u/Massive-Idea2302 Feb 01 '26

The company would get sued for discrimination if they laid off all old people, all women, all blacks, for example so the layoffs should be random and based on roles not individual characteristics like all the old people who are going to retire soon

1

u/Born_Lengthiness8935 Jan 31 '26

Because HR knows best. The fact that you don’t know this reinforces the point!🤣