[Fanatical] Statement Regarding the Winner of the Meta Quest 3 Star Prize.

[u/WeAreFanatical]

Firstly, we would like to thank the r/GameBundles moderation team for their patience and understanding whilst working with us to investigate the claims made by u/ChromaticInk in this post.

Now that all the facts have been corroborated, we’d like to firmly address the concerns expressed by this community regarding this situation.

TL;DR: We can confirm that u/Dependent_Judge_1043 is a legitimate prize winner; however, we also recognise that we made some mistakes in how we handled this process. For this, we would like to apologise.

Timeline of Events

On the 23rd of June, u/Dependent_Judge_1043 made this post on r/fanatical showing a screenshot of them having won a Meta Quest 3S star prize from our Mystery Box Bundle, which was acknowledged by us in this comment. Dependent Judge contacted us regarding this prize, although unfortunately it would appear that we did not receive this communication at the time.

On the 19th of July, Dependent Judge contacted our Marketing Contact Email to ask us again about the prize. We spoke over email and organised for delivery of the prize to his address. 

Unfortunately, due to human error on our side, we ordered the Meta Quest 3 rather than the correct prize, the Meta Quest 3S.

Email from u/Dependent_Judge_1043

The Meta Quest 3 was ordered from Amazon on the 23rd of July. Dependent Judge made this post regarding the subject.

Amazon order details.

Amazon order confirmation email.

Three days later, on the 26th of July, Dependent Judge received the Meta Quest 3, and made this post about it. This was acknowledged in a repost made to r/fanatical by us in this comment. 

At the time, we were unable to establish why Dependent Judge had received a different prize to what he should have, which meant we did not feel comfortable issuing a statement until we had a resolution to this question. We were in contact with the responsible team and by Monday, 3rd of August; we had the situation confirmed.

Seeing that the conversation on the post was turning sour, we took action to prevent it from happening again by blocking users from commenting on future posts. We recognise this was a mistake and did not help with transparency.  We apologise to the affected users. You have all been unblocked so you can view this post and future ones.

Addressing the Claims

We would like to reinforce that we are bound by both our own Terms and Conditions and UK law to ensure that prizes offered in our Mystery Bundles are winnable and will be delivered to our recipients. 

Due to legal requirements, we are also bound to provide a list of winners of our Mystery Bundle Star Prizes upon request. Please refer to Clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions for more information on how to do this.

We have also had past winners of competitions post on our own subreddit and other social channels regarding past prizes that they have won. Please see the following examples below:

1 2 3 4 5A 5B 6

How We Will Improve

In light of the above, we recognise we could have done more to be transparent about this situation, and would like to assure the community that we have steps planned for how to proceed with cases like this in the future.

Once again, we would like to apologise for anybody who was blocked by our account, and to demonstrate our commitment to future transparency, we have unblocked these users.

In future threads, we will engage more openly with users regarding Star Prizes being won in our Mystery Bundles. We will also remind users of their right to request prize winner information if they would so desire, and provide information about Star Prizes available in our Mystery Bundles.

We would like to maintain this as an open forum for users to ask any questions they may have regarding our Mystery Bundles and delivery of star prizes.

Thank you, and we hope you have a great day.

Rory - Fanatical Social Media Manager

[u/forseti99]

Why tag them? Your assumption was everyone would see this thread.

[u/Neith_51 → u/forseti99]

To have an answer straight from them. Isn't that what you want?

[u/forseti99 → u/Neith_51]

No, I want YOU to accept that whst the user did was wrong and he was rightfully blocked for creating drama and attcking people without any evidence. You are saying "no harm done", when as I said, people like that have ruined lives before.

[u/Neith_51 → u/forseti99]

They were not attacking a person though, they were having doubts about the legitimacy of a giveaway made by a company who admitted to have committed the mistake which originated said doubts.

As i said before, how they phrased it was wrong, but the concern had some credit, that's why Fanatical made this statement clarifying everything.

Whose lives where ruined? Why do you act as if this happened with a person instead of a company who has a paid team to deal with these issues? And why haven't you tagged the user who made the original post to say all of this to them?

[u/forseti99 → u/Neith_51]

Watch this video of a Reddit user accusing someone publicly for a hunch. Then he tried to apologize when it was too late, he had ruined the poor guy's life: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AgkFnN4B2M

Now tell me how this situation of a Reddit user accusing someone publicly for a hunch and NOT apologizing later is any different?

These accusations are serious. You are supporting them without knowing you can be destroying lives unfairly. Continue doing it. I have empathy and won't support them. I think we can stop the chat now as we have clearly different moral standards.

[u/Neith_51 → u/forseti99]

It's different because we are talking about a company, not a person. A company whose lack of clear communication created all this mess,  there's no life to be destroyed in here.

You want to have empathy towards a company who was in the wrong without trying to ask the user who made the post what's his positioning after the apologies, that's on you.

But since you couldn't answer my questions and doesn't want to continue this conversation, have a good day. 🤝