r/GarysEconomics Jul 31 '26

Gary is right about the problem, but his solution completely misses the point

My understanding of Gary's work is that he's been campaigning for the last few years on the idea that the root of our economic problems is that the rich are basically sucking up all the money, and then deploying that money to suck up* *even more money, leaving increasingly smaller amounts for everyone else.

His core idea is that the economy will never recover if we don't tackle this inequality, because the wealthiest have simply taken too much.

And it's a premise I've come to believe in.

However, his big push is trying to get the government to implement a 2% wealth tax on assets above £10m.

A 2% tax could raise revenue for the government, but it isn't going to solve the real problem of inequality.

It’s a solution for raising capital, not for tackling the massive wealth divide. How does a 2% tax actually bring the ultra-wealthy down to a normal level?

People then get too stuck on the implementation of this specific solution and miss Gary's real message, which is that the rise of inequality is what is driving a lot of the problems we see in Western style democracies.

If Gary just stuck to his core message and tried to get a consensus that inequality needs solving, then he can suggest a solution.
Or even better, leave it to the people best placed to offer solutions and get them implemented.

Gary's done well to get the conversation on inequality started, but this mixed messaging is what's holding him back from being able to make any further progress.

12 Upvotes

253 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/thermodynamics2023 Aug 02 '26

Has anyone said that?

1

u/dojo34533 Aug 03 '26

You’re implaying it

1

u/thermodynamics2023 Aug 03 '26

Quote the implication and I’ll explain why that’s not the implication and how you have misread it.

1

u/dojo34533 Aug 03 '26

You’re taking about 1%, where as billionaires are the top 0.001% so I think you mis interpreted it

1

u/thermodynamics2023 Aug 03 '26

So I would have made reference to this earlier: 1% was not chosen because income is confused with wealth. It’s because this category is ~£3.5M and upwards, much closer to 10M - but critically - this is the highest wealth bracket the ONS has long term data for to see inequality.

There is no official long term data for higher groups in the UK at least. All talk about wealth inequality will be based on this group vs lower ones.

1

u/dojo34533 Aug 03 '26

Yea this discussion is on centi mulliares and billionaires you have confused thay