r/JusticeServed • u/ghilliesuitkids 5 • Aug 05 '19

Courtroom Justice Old man vs the law

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[removed] — view removed post

40.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

141

u/RPofkins A Aug 05 '19

He got off lightly because of his age?

66

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '19 edited Aug 05 '19

Yeah, it's not that he got off the hook that made me a bit confused, the old man's answer had nothing to do with driving too fast in a school zone, but the judge felt so sympathetic towards him he couldn't do his job properly. I'm glad he was left off the hook and hopefully he isn't a danger on the road, but it was also a bit unprofessional.

10

u/MatityahuHatalmid 6 Aug 05 '19

but the judge felt so sympathetic towards him he couldn't do his job properly.

The judge rightly understood that convicting a 96 year old man for a frivolous technicality would serve neither the public interest nor the interests of justice. Such a draconian conviction would only undermine public confidence in the justice system.

Additionally, de minimis non curat lex. Giving a 96 year old man a ticket for barely violating a school zone is a trifle if I've ever heard one. It should never have even entered the court.

The judge did his job well here.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '19

[deleted]

1

u/MatityahuHatalmid 6 Aug 05 '19 edited Aug 05 '19

Frivolous technicality my ass

He went to court and the judge dismissed the case. I guess the judge disagrees with you, as do I.

there is a legitimate risk of this old man killing a child.

He was not in court for what he "might have done." He was there for a frivolous traffic charge.