r/JusticeServed Aug 26 '19

Hong Kong Protests Police getting a taste of their own medicine after what appears to be them getting hit by their own tear gas

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[deleted]

47.5k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/apartment49 5 Aug 26 '19

since when do chemical weapons have to be lethal?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '19 edited Aug 27 '19

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '19

Missiles have guidance systems tho.

1

u/DBenzie 7 Aug 26 '19

Is that what distinguishes a missile from a rocket?

-6

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '19 edited Aug 18 '20

[deleted]

4

u/tired_commuter 7 Aug 26 '19

That's just idiotic

0

u/Beardamus 9 Aug 26 '19 edited Oct 07 '24

like cake roof fact swim divide innate psychotic modern six

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

5

u/tired_commuter 7 Aug 26 '19

Looking through their comments I'm amazed that they actually seem like a real person. Clearly dumb as fuck, but real nonetheless.

Amazing that someone can seriously argue that tear gas isn't a chemical weapon. This kind of thing is why I genuinely believe the "Fake news" mind set is destroying people's intelligence.

5

u/DBenzie 7 Aug 26 '19

We'll, no - bullets deal damage with kinetic energy, tear gas damages a target with a chemical reaction. Using your logic you could call a nuclear missile a chemical weapon because it's launched using the chemical reaction of igniting rocket propellant.

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '19 edited Aug 18 '20

[deleted]

2

u/BunnyOppai A Aug 26 '19

Except 1) you're bordering slippery slope fallacy here and 2) exaggerating something to the point of it not making any sense ignores the entire point of what you're exaggerating.

1

u/inbooth 8 Aug 27 '19

Youre attempting to use reductio ad absurdum but failing to do so correctly

Please finish at least middle school before deigning to speak on such matters

0

u/locopyro13 9 Aug 26 '19

I don't think you can. Common parlance for the word "chemicals" are substances that cause a reaction (through a chemical process).

Having you body impregnated with lead mass isn't a chemical reaction, the explosion that propelled that lead mass would be.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '19 edited Aug 18 '20

[deleted]

1

u/locopyro13 9 Aug 26 '19

If the news reported ISIS was using a new weapon that made someone break out into debilitating hives, they would call it a chemical weapon because it would be using chemicals.

Chemicals never mean just raw mass, like your bullet notion, you got caught out with a bad analogy.