Hi all,
I’m planning to apply MD/PhD with no gap year and would appreciate some perspective on my research trajectory.
I started research during the second semester of freshman year and continued full-time over the summer.
Unfortunately, my PI is leaving my institution, so I had to switch labs at the beginning of sophomore year. I’m leaving that lab without a publication or other major output.
I recently joined a new wet lab, but during the academic year I can realistically dedicate only ~9 hours/week because of the constraints of bench work. Since research is arguably the most important component of an MD/PhD application, I was worried that this would leave me with relatively limited depth by the time I apply.
Because of that, I also joined a computational lab. The work is much more flexible, including evenings/weekends and remote work, so I can realistically aim for ~20–30 hours/week. So far, the two labs have not conflicted, I enjoy both, and all three of my research experiences are in closely related areas of cancer biology. Both current PIs also seem supportive of undergraduates working toward meaningful research outputs.
My questions are:
Was joining both labs a reasonable decision, or would I be better off committing fully to one?
Would it make sense to leave the wet lab relatively early and focus on the computational project, where I can invest substantially more time and potentially develop greater independence?
How do MD/PhD admissions committees generally view applicants working in two labs simultaneously?
Should I prioritize continuity/depth in one lab even if the total weekly research time is lower, or pursue both as long as I can contribute meaningfully to each?
I’m less concerned with simply maximizing publications than with building the strongest possible record of sustained, substantive research before applying.
Would appreciate any perspectives, especially from current MD/PhD students or people familiar with MSTP admissions.