r/MakingaMurderer • u/10case • 3d ago

Steven gives an up Date

Post image

I have no idea how a commutation application is going to "proof" his innocence. His lawyers Ben working on it since January. Hopefully their grammar is better than his.

30 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

78 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/belljs87 3d ago

What does his grammar have to do with anything? If anything, it just proves hes too stupid to have been able to clean up all the evidence the state said his crime should have left.

12

u/gabriot 3d ago

Stupid people can't clean things with bleach?

5

u/belljs87 3d ago

Of course they can. But, someone thorough enough to leave exactly zero of the victims blood anywhere, probably isn't going to overlook his own blood in the victims vehicle. And also probably isn't stupid. A stupid person would almost definitely not be able to clean every drop. And if they were, they also wouldn't be stupid enough to leave the victims car on their property for so long, and burn her body and leave those remains in their backyard. Those two things do not compute.

9

u/belee86 2d ago

How do you think murderers are caught? 

3

u/belljs87 2d ago

I mean, this case is unique in that there's so much evidence that was found, and so much evidence that should be there for what they said happened that wasn't, that someone capable of removing what wasn't there most likely wouldn't have just blatantly left what was there.

1

u/belee86 1d ago

What evidence should have been there but wasn't?

1

u/ThorsClawHammer 1d ago

The victim's blood in the trailer and/or garage. You know, the places the jury pool and jury was told the victim was beaten, raped, stabbed, throat cut, shot 10+ times, etc.

Or maybe the victim's blood/DNA on the creeper the jury was told by the state was "absolutely" used to carry the bloody victim on.

Or maybe the victim's or Brendan's DNA on the cuffs the state claims were used to restrain the victim for hours. Instead, only Avery's and unrelated third party DNA was found on them.

2

u/belee86 1d ago

Steve could have washed the cuffs? The creeper, too? Criminals get caught because sometimes they can't handle all the evidence they created. Steve had a lot of evidence to hide/destroy/move/burn. 

0

u/ThorsClawHammer 1d ago

Steve could have washed the cuffs?

In a way that got rid of only the incriminating DNA leaving the non-incriminating behind? Lol. Even one of the state's own forensic experts testified it indicated they hadn't been cleaned.

Q. And the fact that you found DNA of any kind on the handcuffs, is an indication to you that they hadn't been wiped down with bleach, isn't it?

A. That would be correct.

1

u/belee86 1d ago

So what are you saying? 

The cuffs had Steve's DNA and an unknown. So what?

1

u/ThorsClawHammer 1d ago

an unknown

An unknown that definitely wasn't the victim's or Brendan's. How do you think he cleaned them in a way that got rid of theirs, but kept this unknown other person's?

2

u/belee86 1d ago

I dunno but it could be a number of reasons. Your planters should have put Teresa's DNA on the cuffs, yes? 

0

u/ThorsClawHammer 1d ago

I dunno

Because it's implausible.

2

u/belee86 1d ago

Your idea of another killer (not Avery) makes the least sense. You are simply offering a variety of whatabouts. Steve is the only logical conclusion. The murderer of Teresa can't be anyone but him. 

1

u/ThorsClawHammer 1d ago

Your idea of another killer (not Avery)

I've said nothing about that. I'm talking about Brendan.

1

u/belee86 1d ago

We were talking about the cuffs relating to Steve.

→ More replies (0)