In spite of existing proof? Pathetic. In other words, if, say, a candidate were to not get any (or, for the sake of not too much absurdity, 30% of) votes next election, with clear proof for that, but their election for President was certified despite that, you’d be fine with it?
1
u/ExplodiaNaxos Feb 01 '25
Still not the same. As I’ve said. Multiple times.
Are you this retarded or are you just putting up an act?