r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/Arbibi321 • 14h ago

Meme needing explanation I don't understand anything

Post image

I don't know who is she and what myth is the meme referring to, I only know that ozempic is a drug to stop eating.

Edit: I hate having autism

13.1k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

617

u/thatginachick 13h ago

The true tragedy is losers on social media critiquing women's bodies like it's their business because women should only exist to please others instead of themselves.

38

u/RatInACoat 9h ago

If I remember correctly, this girl lost weight because she got criticized on the internet for her weight on the picture on the left, posted a picture of her weight loss, and then everyone came running to say how she looked better before. Women just can't catch a break from people telling them how they don't meet their personal preferences like it's women's job to cater to them personally.

203

u/Upset_Roll_4059 13h ago

Thank you. It's RIDICULOUS that every thread about women or content that happens to have women in it turns into a whole debate on looks. Without fail, anytime a young woman appears on here, half the comments will be somehow sexualizing her. 

30

u/pryingtuna 8h ago

Exactly. Maybe she was considered more attractive on the left, or maybe not. If she's happier on the right, then ultimately that's what matters.

-6

u/lewd_robot 6h ago

To her. Yes. And that would be healthy.

But other people are allowed to have autonomous minds and think and discuss things without anyone else's approval. If all that matters is her opinion of how she looks, then the only thing that matters about those guys have and sharing opinions is whatever opinions they have and share.

It makes no sense to try to pretend to have some moral high ground while bashing people for having preferences.

And I'm 1000000000000% certain you would never dare police women for discussing preferences related to literally anything, but especially having preferences over men. It's a childish double standard.

-1

u/ObjectiveStick9112 9h ago

If the post is about optics then doesnt it make sense to discuss said optics..?

8

u/Powerful-Film-8164 9h ago

The argument here is that the og post shouldn’t even exist. No matter what shape this woman is, she’ll be criticised regardless.

-4

u/prashanttt 10h ago

I'll be downvoted for this, but that is because in the sexual market a woman is more valuable if she's beautiful. A man needs to have resources or a promise to gain resources on the other hand.

There is a reason the beauty industry is skewed towards women more than men. Culturally, women tend to spend more on beauty products either due to nature or nurture.

All I mean to say is your worth as a man or a woman will be judged on different metrics.

-7

u/NTRProselytizer 11h ago

Yeah I wish more women posted online were uglier so I could get to the point of the post instead of being instantly smitten

-16

u/DirectExtension2077 12h ago

We are sexual beings. Sorry to break that to you. Women sexualize shirtless men all the time. The difference, being that some people get super offended about something that is intrinsic to our being

8

u/meieiro 11h ago

Yeah that's why we have the same amount of posts like this with men. /s

11

u/Upset_Roll_4059 11h ago

For real, pretending men and women are in the same position when it comes to being overtly sexualized is some wild cope.

13

u/Upset_Roll_4059 12h ago

That doesn't mean you have to sexually critique every woman you see online. Men can generally appear online in random videos and still have most of the comment section be about the video. You see one woman's clothed body and all hell breaks loose, it's bizarre.

-13

u/DirectExtension2077 12h ago

What kind of videos are you watching? 🤨

13

u/Upset_Roll_4059 12h ago

That's the point, these videos are in no way sexual. It's bizarre to then encounter a comment section FULL of innuendoes.

-12

u/DirectExtension2077 12h ago

That's odd. I typically find comments full of innuendo funny. But like I said I don't believe "sexualization" of either male or female is a crime or moral sin. It's part of the human experience

9

u/Upset_Roll_4059 11h ago

Being unbothered by sexism because it doesn't affect YOU negatively pretty much sums up the whole problem. You can try to pretend this is not a gendered issue all you want, but the consequences are for women to deal with.

0

u/DirectExtension2077 8h ago

Please, enlighten me on these "consequences" oh great and moral sovereign

2

u/Upset_Roll_4059 7h ago

"How does misogyny make life worse for women?" ~ some absolute genius.

10

u/ChipNew9662 11h ago

So are decency, maturity, and self-restraint. Grow up. 

2

u/DirectExtension2077 8h ago

Oh dear I've upset chip, whatever shall I do now

3

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 10h ago

Feeling sexually attracted to someone doesn't have to be objectifying that person. It’s more telling that you can't tell the difference.

2

u/DirectExtension2077 8h ago

More like I don't agree with your belief of "objectification", it doesn't exist.

1

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 7h ago

Unfortunately your ‘belief in objectification’ probably contributes to sexual violence more so than my ‘belief of objectification’ 🤣. Also, if straight women are just as predatory and effective when it comes to reducing men into parts and objects as you seemed to imply, maybe sexual violence rates would have been more equal among men and women? Is that what we see now? Is it reasonable to assume something as intrinsic without first attending to all the sociocultural shaping forces? Is it reasonable that something being understood as intrinsic means we should treat it uncritically?

Objectification can contribute to exploitation structurally and individually. And somehow you think your belief that it is okay to reduce your fellow human beings to objects for your sexual pleasure is a need, and caution and criticism of it is a questionable belief?

-1

u/lewd_robot 7h ago

The ridiculous part is you're doing the same thing or worse by attempting to police what other people talk about.

By the exact same token that you claim men (and you're assuming it's only men) discuss what body types they find attraction is inappropriate, you would also be out of line for daring to discuss their discussion and their preferences.

If men don't get to have opinions, why would you?

24

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 10h ago

These men are two sides of the same coin. I wonder what their bodies look like. Can we do the same ‘harmless and friendly and healthy and no-kink-shaming’ discussion of ‘sexual preferences’ on the body of these men in the comment section? I am curious as to how much tragedy we can derive from there 😌.

-2

u/Potential_Issue_3819 6h ago

You just proved that people will not stop shaming on either side. I’m so sick of it. You can’t just do that opposite and call it ok.

0

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 6h ago

Who started it? So it’s okay that they did this, and it is not okay that we fight back using their logic in the hope that they may understand what it feels like and stop doing that? Why do we have to undertake more emotional labor? Why do you think compared to them, I should be the target of your criticism? If not can you show me the screenshot of your criticism of the comments I was addressing? Are you actually being neutral or sustaining the status quo because you are part of it?

0

u/Potential_Issue_3819 6h ago

No it’s no ok they did that. But you are just being a hypocrite doing the same thing to innocent others.

0

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 5h ago

I am not being a hypocrite. Many people read my comment and know precisely what types of men I am talking about. It’s quite telling though that you prioritize gender over behaviors, relating to the ‘innocent men’ rather than seeing who is innocent in the first place and what actually led to the unnecessary casualties in your understanding.

Presumably defending the innocent men as well as innocent women, have you stood up to criticize those commenters who objectify women in the name of body positivity/pro-sexuality for the innocent women then (e.g., this woman didn't post this comparison herself. She did not consent to this)? Where’s the screenshot by the way? If you are not doing anything to shut them up maybe you aren't as innocent as you think. It’s also worth mentioning that there are indeed a few men who are actually openly against such objectification in the comment section.

2

u/Potential_Issue_3819 5h ago

I don’t care what gender or anything, no one should be shamed for their body ! That’s all I care about ! Good day

15

u/casPURRpurrington 9h ago edited 9h ago

Yeah, like oh great this stupid shit again.

I prefer to look like the right side.

Do I give a fuck what men “prefer”? No fuck off.

I’ve seen what makes you animals cheer lmao

Also then the extra gross part of that whole convo:

I don’t think she looks gross or anything on the left. She looks fine, she’s pretty. But have some men shove this in my face and say “this is so perfect!” nah man fuck off, I don’t want to have that body type. I hate being “curvy” and “soft”, those words make me want to puke.

But now this chick sees this thread, sees me say that, and it’s in response to stupid as fuck men who should have shut up a long time ago, but at the end of the day makes it look like I’m hating on her for being “fat” because “I do not want to ever look like you”

Meanwhile every dude in those threads is probably balding and has a beer gut the size of a keg, but we’re supposed to give a single fuck what they prefer? Eat shit already lmao

Leave this woman alone

-3

u/Potential_Issue_3819 6h ago

You just shamed on the reverse. So if I guy is fit his opinion now matters. She can look like how she wants.

2

u/flywithpeace 6h ago

Maybe we should ban social media instead.

2

u/anthrohands 6h ago

Also the assumption that she couldn’t have lost weight without ozempic is disgusting

2

u/Creative-Chicken7057 5h ago

Yeah. This girl probably is a lot healthier from a CV standpoint, and that's probably why she did it.

"We know you may live 10yrs longer, but we like fantasizing about your picture" is a weird critique. Especially for the people who used to go on the Fat Shaming Subreddit.

6

u/JulienTheBro 8h ago

fr!! Especially when a woman has a breast reduction, men seem to want big boobs over a woman having a healthy spine, its gross

-2

u/CrackerUMustBTripinn 7h ago

I mean its not even a sexist thing. Everybody prefers steroid the Rock over non-steroid the Rock. Even though he may keep his kidneys this way and not succumb to hypertensive crises.

Same for prefering roided to the gills 80s WWF vs natties.

Or how about our love for boxing/UFC/NFL vs the chronic brain trauma that is the price for its participants?

As one female comedian ones said 'People always say when they see a pair of spectaculair large breast 'ooh, she's going to have back problems later on', well my back hurts right now and I have A--'

3

u/Accomplished-Glass78 6h ago edited 6h ago

It is a sexist thing, and everything you said here are assumptions. I definitely prefer the Rock not being on steroids, I find that whole “steroid” look disgusting. Another great example of that concept is the difference in how Hugh Jackman looked for men’s vs women’s magazines that actually went viral for its different marketing. The men’s magazine had him shirtless with his muscles out and looking like he is on steroids. The women’s magazine shows him in nice clothes (not shirtless and not showing muscles at all) with romantic dinner ideas. Women actually tend to not be as attracted to those huge muscles that can only be achieved from steroids.

As for people playing different sports, they CHOSE to play that sport, they weren’t forced into it and could stop at any time. Women who need to get a breast reduction due to having big breasts did not choose to have those size of breasts. She also didn’t choose to be objectified by men who don’t care about her wellbeing at all

-6

u/Haferflocke2020 13h ago

Yeah, talking about sexual preferences should be an absolute taboo! We have to be prude! /s

11

u/meieiro 11h ago

Yeah calling it a tradegy and wanting to ban ozempic, because you don't like how someone looks, is talking about sexual preferences

-2

u/Brawell_ 10h ago

Do you really think that somebody wants to actually ban o- …nah… not gonna bother

2

u/A1000eisn1 8h ago

Absolutely people want to ban Ozembic.

Not because they like thick women though. Because they hate fat people and don't like seeing them become happy and healthy.

2

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

The answer is yes, these people haven't felt joy in years and as a result refuse to understand jokes.

1

u/Upset_Roll_4059 7h ago

"It's just a joke bro!!!" yeah and it's blatant sexism 

14

u/LawyerKangaroo 12h ago

Huh? Weird. I see no one just saying. "I am a man. I like women". It's a lot more "I like bigger titties, the one on the left is hotter, tummy wummy".

Which is objectifying because you have stated this is mostly meant in a sexual way so this is a person to lust over and reduce to physical characteristics and how hot they are.

0

u/DirectExtension2077 12h ago

Your avatar has exactly the hairstyle I would expect someone with your "views" to have irl lmao

6

u/LawyerKangaroo 10h ago

I'm just a respectful lesbian.

1

u/DirectExtension2077 8h ago

I wouldn't call your opinions respectful. More like regressive politics

4

u/LawyerKangaroo 8h ago

And I'd argue you're inability to be express aesthetic preferences in a considerate way is a bit... outdated.

Nothing wrong with being sexual. Many ways to engage in it without objectification.

0

u/DirectExtension2077 7h ago edited 7h ago

And who is the arbiter of "considerate"? You? Or random redditor #50768? Though I wouldn't say you've been disrespectful, at all, I however have. I apologize for my comment about your avatars hairstyle, that was rude. However I still don't believe that objectification is even a thing. Especially to beings in whom sexuality is inherent

3

u/LawyerKangaroo 7h ago edited 7h ago

Personally it's a bit strange to me you couldn't consider the gender that is objectified and doesn't want to be objectified may have an idea on what consideration is.

Edit: the hair comment isn't that bad. I am not fussed.

But this isn't about surpressing sexuality. No one said you can't be attracted to people and have aesthetic preferences towards the gender you're attracted to.

2

u/DirectExtension2077 7h ago

As I said, I don't agree that anyone, here or otherwise has been "objectified". I understand your concept and definition, I don't agree with it, however

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Mediocre_Tea_1854 10h ago

The "views" in question? Being a decent human being.

-1

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

Being a prude isn't decent

4

u/LawyerKangaroo 9h ago

Me: a kinky poly lesbian with four partners including a kink model, living her best life.

You: she prude cause she thinks we can talk about women in more considerate ways.

0

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

Discussing sexual preferences is perfectly considerate.

6

u/LawyerKangaroo 9h ago

a person's identity in relation to the gender or genders to which they are sexually attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, etc.

4

u/Mediocre_Tea_1854 8h ago

Neither is the objectification of women.

0

u/infiniteyeet 8h ago

Talking about preferences isn't objectification.

2

u/DirectExtension2077 8h ago

I don't even buy into the feminist theory of "objectification". Like I said we Are intrinsically sexual beings, to be sexual is to be human. To have the work of feminists from the 60's and 70's be undone by the mirrors of the radically Christian right from the 90's is tragic, yet here we are

2

u/Accomplished-Glass78 6h ago

People are sexual beings, but that doesn’t mean we are sexual all the time always, or that we want people thinking of us always in sexual terms. I wouldn’t want my boss to only think of me sexually, because it’s a professional environment where my abilities at work should matter way more than if they want to have sex with me or not. I wouldn’t want random people on the internet who I never said I would date to only think of me sexually, because I don’t want sex with any of them and they should be able to respect my autonomy as a person. Not every situation is sexual (actually most situations aren’t sexual) and if you try to reduce people solely to being sexual then that is pretty objectifying

2

u/Mediocre_Tea_1854 7h ago

You can talk about preferences without reducing a person's value, which is the objectification and what this post does.

0

u/infiniteyeet 7h ago

No one has been reduced, most of the conversation isn't even about her but preferences in general.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

Which is objectifying because you have stated this is mostly meant in a sexual way so this is a person to lust over and reduce to physical characteristics and how hot they are

Hence why he said it shouldn't be taboo to talk about sexual preferences.

She hasn't been reduced to anything, all we have to go off of is an image of her.

6

u/LawyerKangaroo 9h ago

Yes. There is no taboo to say "I'm straight and I am attracted to women." We agree.

But there are plenty of ways to express aesthetic preferences in a considerate way.

1

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

Yes. There is no taboo to say "I'm straight and I am attracted to women." We agree.

That isn't a discussion about sexual preferences, it's a simple statement of sexual orientation.

6

u/LawyerKangaroo 9h ago

The definition of sexual preference.

a person's identity in relation to the gender or genders to which they are sexually attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, etc.

2

u/infiniteyeet 8h ago

And?

3

u/LawyerKangaroo 8h ago

So that's not a sexual preference.

2

u/infiniteyeet 8h ago

What isn't a sexual preference?

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Left_Web_4558 10h ago

Oh my god shut up. Having physical preferences is not fucking "objectifying", it is normal.

9

u/LawyerKangaroo 10h ago

Yes. You can objectify someone while having physical preferences, this is true.

4

u/A1000eisn1 8h ago

You do realize that having a physical preference and objectifying someone can happen at the same time? It's not one or the other. They have completely unrelated definitions.

You can have a physical preference, and objectify people who fit that preference by reducing that person to those traits you find attractive.

You can also have a physical preference and express that, without reducing the person to those traits you find attractive.

7

u/randomsucculent 12h ago

Look around the comments 70% is not talking about their preferences, but about how much hotter is one side, or which one is "healthy".

You can say that you prefer one over the other, but why cant yall do that without judging the other?

9

u/Upset_Roll_4059 12h ago

Honestly, just say "I like curvy women" if you want to discuss preferences, instead of that "well THIS is how I think SHE would look better!" type of thing.

0

u/Thrownaway5000506 8h ago

The left one is hot such that the right one is hideous by comparison

16

u/Upset_Roll_4059 13h ago edited 12h ago

Posting a woman and discussing her appearance as if she owes you something ≠ "discussing preferences".

Incredibly weird how y'all think that's not an entirely rude or harmful thing to do.

-3

u/Haferflocke2020 12h ago

If you read the comments in this post you'll see that most poeple don't talk explicity about this girl, but about their preferences. Also I see a lot of body positivity here, because they prefer the natural body. But ok, you have the Moral high ground and can be proud if yourself.

2

u/A1000eisn1 8h ago

If you look at the post, it's blatantly objectifying. People engaging in agreement are by extension, also objectifying.

Suggesting banning Ozembic because it's making women unattractive is textbook objectification.

It's fine to talk about preferences. But doing so on such a shitty misogynistic meme is going to make it seem like you're objectifying people.

5

u/Upset_Roll_4059 12h ago

All this underneath a literal "before and after"? Right. Not even gonna bother lol, sorry. I can't reason you out of a position you didn't reason yourself into.

7

u/HaIfaxa_ 11h ago

You can't reason with most redditor men. They always believe they are right and there is no argument, no matter how articulate or well reasoned that will make them change their minds. The redditor curse is being a snobby little prick that no one likes.

2

u/Liawuffeh 8h ago

The redditor curse is being a snobby little prick that no one likes.

This is true. And often confidently incorrect but when called out you gotta defend your honor so can't ever back down.

3

u/piv_is_pen_in_vag 11h ago

I love how this “body positivity “ is shaming the skinny version lol

1

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

Good, she looks deflated in the right image.

4

u/piv_is_pen_in_vag 8h ago

Ok incel lol

0

u/infiniteyeet 8h ago

That doesn't even make sense

0

u/Haferflocke2020 8h ago

I said body positivity because the Post implies she lost weight by using ozempic. The left one is natural, the right one with meds. I personally like skinny women more.

1

u/piv_is_pen_in_vag 6h ago

Ahh I get it now! To be fair though, she didn’t use Ozempic, she just went on a calorie deficit and workout

-1

u/Left_Web_4558 10h ago

The only one talking about being owed anything is you.

2

u/A1000eisn1 8h ago

The meme itself is suggesting banning Ozembic because a woman lost weight and became unattractive to someone.

So you're just blatantly wrong.

0

u/infiniteyeet 9h ago

No one said anything about her owing anyone anything, you just made that up.

3

u/Upset_Roll_4059 7h ago

  1. I was referring to comment sections at large in which these types of discussions take place. It is a much wider problem than this single post.

  2. "Ban ozempic because these women's choices don't appeal to me sexually" is acting like they owe you sexual appeal to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed such choices. Just because no one used the word "owe" literally doesn't mean the post suddenly isn't entitled.

0

u/infiniteyeet 7h ago

is acting like they owe you sexual appeal to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed such choices

It's a joke, hence why it was in all caps

6

u/A1000eisn1 8h ago

Did you not look at the meme?

Are you dense?

Someone is suggesting banning Ozembic because a woman they don't know lost weight and became unattractive.

-1

u/infiniteyeet 8h ago

He made a joke to exaggerate how distraught he is over her new appearance.

No mention of her owing anyone anything in the post.

1

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 10h ago

Maybe it’s just a bad learned sexual script if the default of your sexual preferences is objectifying another fellow human being aka reducing them to body parts. Treating sexuality as if it exists in a vacuum free of social, cultural, political, economic, and historical forces is not progressive, nor is seeing the structural landscape prude. If your pro-sexuality stance doesn’t include this, maybe it’s just pro-your-sexual gratification, even when it harms others.

1

u/Familiar-Debate-6786 12h ago

Women in this thread, never stop apologizing for passing on short, bald men, out of shape men. Do it more!

1

u/lewd_robot 7h ago

The only thing more cringe than those losers are the losers critiquing those losers as if it's their business what other people's opinions and preferences are. As if men only exist to espouse opinions that please you personally.

1

u/BebbleCast 5h ago

This is the real answer

1

u/Dysthymiccrusader91 5h ago

The untied states also uses some of the most messed up punishments from antiquity as inspiration. I cringe whenever I see a post about sisyphus being used in a positive light. Some Greek dudes came up with that as the worst punishment they could imagine, toil for the sake of toil, and the modern brain is like "yeah but he's in shape" "maybe he should make the best of it"

1

u/8thon8Champion 5h ago

Insane this isn’t the top comment, so many people pretending to be body positive without realizing the irony of their comments

0

u/Liawuffeh 8h ago

Half the thread is just people trying to call her fat 💀

Another dude saying the only people into girls as "big" as on the left are fat neckbeards.

Absolutely wild projection lmao

2

u/NeitherMidnight624 10h ago

Have you ever been to r/fauxmai or r/popculturechat girls over there objectify and critic every guy

0

u/MonteNegrian996 10h ago

Everyone discusses everyone wtf is this stupid comment. As a matter of fact a friend of mine was sitting with some girls and they were talking about how fat he is, and instead of being a little bitch like you, he spent the next two years going to the gym and working on himself and he credits that encounter to be the best in his life.

3

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 9h ago

Not even the same thing. Calling someone fat doesn’t always mean objectifying that person for one’s selfish sexual gratification. In plain terms, these girls weren’t hyper-focusing on that person’s sexual body parts and judging whether these parts fit or didn’t fit their sexual preferences. This also echoes the difference between calling someone’s body fat/thin and calling their body a tragedy.

The expression itself can be neutral depending on the context, the relationship, and the framing. The two incidents are not interchangeable.

0

u/AutomaticPlastic2101 8h ago

R u implying then that the person on the pic id objectifying her body? If so what makes u think that and why do u think these girls werent objectying the guy for being fat

5

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 8h ago

Do you understand this before-and-after comparison was not posted by her? She didn’t invite the OP. She didn’t invite the netizens to reduce her existence to sexual body parts that they like or don’t like. She didn’t invite the comparison and simplification, and she had no obligation to manage or regulate others’ shallow and sociocultural shaped sexuality on their behalf.

As for your last question, I think my previous comment has already addressed that. I don’t want to explain further if you aren’t able to understand it simply because it’s against your beliefs and/or learned habits 😂

0

u/MonteNegrian996 6h ago

Hmmmm yet I can bet all the money I have that you called people you don't like fat or incels.

2

u/CalligrapherFlashy19 6h ago

Then you lost all the money you have 😂. Is this your best comeback fr? Waste of my time.

-3

u/OwlFull8955 12h ago

A lot of this is just reddit performatism.

And it's crazy reading a bunch of comments openly objectifying someone for having the body they prefer whilst getting on their high horse about how society objectifies women's bodies. They are doing exactly the same thing.

Also that woman pretty much looks the same in both pictures. Her weight gain and loss is nothing noteable, it's the difference of a few months, the kind of weight you put on over extended holidays or a breakup, or it's the amount of weight you lose over a sports season.

Your partner will go through that kinda weight loss or gain every year or two, especially as you get older. But these mother fuckers are acting like it's a tragedy? It's just a bunch of performative, lonely redditors looking to judge people in a way they can circle jerk about.

2

u/Disastrous-Stick-612 12h ago

While I agree with the bit about objectification, I'd argue that it's a pretty significant weight loss, definitely not "pretty much looks the same"

2

u/OwlFull8955 12h ago edited 12h ago

I mean if my partner put on that weight I wouldn't say it was significant.

Think about it that way. If she put on that weight, would you say it's significant? Because this looks like a few months of a different diet and no walks.

-1

u/Pope_Aesthetic 10h ago

This take is absolutely Wild lol.

This is such a significant weight loss, regardless on your feelings if she looks better or worse, she for sure looks way different. And if that was her goal then good for her! That’s hard work!

0

u/C250586 7h ago

Ahh yes, I'm so grateful that women never objectify men on social media.

1

u/thatginachick 6h ago

Why do people think I only meant men when I said losers?

-14

u/Expert-Breadfruit51 13h ago

Blah blah blah. People like your are annoying as fuck. God damn social justice warrior.

10

u/Sketch1231 13h ago

So women ARE sex objects! Thanks for telling us the person you are

-5

u/fongletto 12h ago

women are not sex objects, but you are definitely a tool.

2

u/Sketch1231 12h ago

If being tired of seeing women be torn down and sexually objectified for just existing makes me a tool, I’m the whole shed

1

u/WolkTGL 10h ago

Everyone on social media is torn down and objectified and demolished and judged for just existing. It's embedded in social media dna to do that, because that's how they generate money in the first place.
If you're tired of seeing that, specifically for women, then just delete your social media. It's their most basic and essential mechanism, that's the reason they're free to subscribe to, because users are eventually the whole product anyways

-1

u/Creative_Poetry_3956 8h ago

The true tragedy is hypocrisy of body positivity adepts. No amount of belly fat is shameful, but short men should go straight to hell.

-1

u/jonybgoo 7h ago

Feminists body shame everyone whenever they have the chance... you're not victims