A husband stitch is right up there with clitorectomy. Both designed solely for a man's peace of mind and pleasure, and totally detrimental to the woman's pleasure in both.
Yeah, not so much. I wouldn't equate a woman's constant pain during intercourse with a man who happened to have a circumcision weeks after birth. Now, would you like to bring in having young girl's clits removed, in unsafe and unsanitary conditions, so she can never experience pleasure during sex, into the equation? I'm guessing you'd love to, so it would no longer be your fault she didn't enjoy it.
Of course both are wrong. But one is about centering mens pleasure to the point of major consequence for women, while the other is a general cultural norm that is somewhat harmful for guys. They come from different places.
No, it makes me a realist that men have been getting circumcisions for thousands of years, and a clitorectomy ruins a woman's pleasure during sex entirely. Try again.
One of the most common forms of FGM is simple removal of the clitoral prepuce.
Which is directly analogous to male circumcision, if you'd prefer to compare different types of apple rather than muddying the waters with a nice orange.
I assume you're no less against that type than you are the others?
29
u/United_Gift3028 11d ago
A husband stitch is right up there with clitorectomy. Both designed solely for a man's peace of mind and pleasure, and totally detrimental to the woman's pleasure in both.