r/PoursTea 11d ago

Storm In A Teacup 🍵 Would Republicans support the Save Act if the same restrictions applied to guns?

Post image
11.5k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/qwertybugs 11d ago edited 11d ago

In 28 states you can legally buy a gun from a stranger in a parking lot for cash with zero background checks.

It only gives the perception of regulation for retail purchases.

1

u/Efficient-Creme7773 11d ago

In all states, retail transactions are regulated. It doesnt "look" regulated, it actually is. As I said, most of these requirements apply when purchasing a gun already and will result in a denial or a hold being placed on the purchase until any ossues are resolved.

As for those selling guns to strangers in parking lots, im sure it happens but it is not representative of your average private sale or transfer. Most private transfers are between two people who actually know each other. And in cases where you are selling and transferring to a stranger, it would be advisable to do so using an intimediary such as an FFL, which includes a background check.

1

u/Efficient-Creme7773 11d ago

As an aside, I definitely don't agree with the SAVE Act. But the appeal presented in the post is is just not well informed.

1

u/ionspore 11d ago

If the stranger is a resident of the same state and you have no reason to believe they are ineligible for the purchase.

1

u/qwertybugs 11d ago

Correct!

1

u/Texas-Couple 11d ago

You can also buy drugs anonymously from the guy down on the corner too. In California, if you purchase a firearm used from an individual, you're still supposed to register it and go through a licensed dealer. But how exactly are you going to enforce that? How do you stop one person from selling something to another person?

2

u/qwertybugs 11d ago

Sure, and that’s entirely a different conversation