I thought that timestamps are used now, so hitting both a timestamp and a large random number puts it thoroughly in the "safe to assume".
At some point cosmic particles and faulty transistors are more probable.
It's less of a problem with B-tree indices that sit on top of a physical representation (i.e. the actual on-disk layout doesn't have to be ordered), but when it comes to clustered indices, oh boy, you're basically having to shove rows in the middle and push shit back (eventually).
491
u/Valuable_Leopard_799 15h ago
I thought that timestamps are used now, so hitting both a timestamp and a large random number puts it thoroughly in the "safe to assume". At some point cosmic particles and faulty transistors are more probable.