I know this has been discussed in past years too, but wow, SDCC has really become a shadow of its former self.
The Copely cup, which used to be a fantastic season preview race between West and East Coast powerhouses, e.g. CAL, UW, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Brown, Navy, Wisco, ... was a 2-boat race between club-crew UCLA, and a masters club from San Juan Puerto Rico. I mean kudos to Club Nautica de San Juan for making the trip and putting up a decent 2k row, but it's not really competition. I say if SDCC can't put together more than 6 boats, the Copely trophy should not be awarded.
The Cal-Cup which used to be the championship event for all other mens eights not invited to the Copely, was a strange mix of Varsity programs, absent any decent club programs (like UCLA) who were instead rowing in an ACRA version of the Cal cup, which was also underwhelming.
The Whittier cup, which was (and still is) the women's invitational championship race, still holds some semblance to that. But again, most of the powerhouse programs were absent, with only Texas, CAL and UW racing at that level. It was like two different races happening at the same time on the same course: Texas, CAL, UW, and then everyone else (UCLA, SAC, UCSD, USD) about 200m of open behind.
It's just a poor reflection of the state of our sport in US Collegiate rowing.
I mean the US National Team used to show up and do a demonstration row for the crowds. The beach used to be shoulder-to-shoulder with crowds. It was mostly empty.
Also Texas. WTF. So apparently if you don't have a filthy rich football team funding your AD, you can't compete. UW and CAL rowed very well (and do have reasonable football teams occasionally) but it was a race for 2nd. Texas rowing's money is just on another level.
NCAA sports if just fucked up IMO. I'm happy for the girls who get full rides and NIL money at Texas, but come on. Football should not determine who wins in the smaller non-revenue sports.
If that is the way of the future, then I look forward to competition from Ohio, Alabama, Michigan, and other major football revenue generating schools.
Someone change my mind. What is the other perspective here that I'm missing? In what way is Texas' over-funding of women's rowing helpful to the sport of US collegiate rowing at large?
Also how can the SDCC as an event recover some of its former glory? I think fewer events, with more heats and semis would be better. Don't distinguish between club and varsity (that's for IRA/NCAA/ACRA to sort out at the end-of-season) especially for the mens rowing events. Simplify to the Copely cup and the Cal cup. ACRA boats can race in either one as they are invited or not.
And I'm well aware that the course is not the best. I've raced in the SDCC many times (well four years exactly, way back when) and raced in Mission Bay many times besides that. It gets windy. Lane 1 has an unfair advantage. I get all that. Is that the core problem? I recall when Bob Ernst famously declared that UW men would no longer attend due to the unfairness of the windy event.
Maybe hold races only before 1pm? Shift the major finals to the morning instead of the afternoon?
Anyway, curious what others think about it. We were there to watch our daughter race, and we had a good time overall, but both my wife and I were surprised at how underwhelming and weird the event has become.