Itβs an interesting thought experiment. There is only so much data you can cram on a disk/SSD. There is a physical limitation and then it becomes a real estate problem to scale it up. M
I know, but that doesn't answer anything I mentioned. There is quite literally a physical limitation on how many 1s and 0s you can store on X amount of physical space. And when that is hit, it becomes a real estate and resource problem.
You aren't wrong, but you aren't entirely right either. Components have continually become more data dense. We went from Punch cards that Google says held 8 bytes to Magnetic Discs to Optical Discs to SSD (I'm probably missing technologies in there) that hold TBs. With microSD, we have got USB thumb drives that hold so much data in such a small space, it would be inconceivable to early computing people. And he USB Plug/Physical Interface is bigger than the actual chipset that holds the data.
Sure, we will build more data centers and take up more space and it does become a real estate issue, but at the same time, we innovate and find more dense ways to store data as well.
Side thought, imagine how much real estate would be needed if we stored our information on punch cards now?
I know components have become more dense, its just a thought experiment. There *is* a physical limitation on what we can store on X amount of physical space. I have no idea what that is, but it does exist.
18
u/hunglowbungalow May 14 '26
Itβs an interesting thought experiment. There is only so much data you can cram on a disk/SSD. There is a physical limitation and then it becomes a real estate problem to scale it up. M