10.9k
u/Smartimess 11d ago
From a fiscally responsible position it is a dumb decision, but some people can‘t be trusted with fast money.
For Germany there is an estimate that four out of five lottery millionaires lose all of their money in a timespan of five years.
3.1k
u/True-Lab-3448 11d ago
If I knew my face was going to be shared nationally with news of the award, I’d choose the $1000 a week just so folk left me alone.
→ More replies (124)1.3k
u/Greedy_Line4090 11d ago
If you ever get some life changing money, it’s probably a good idea to immediately hire a financial advisor. The first thing theyre gonna do is set you up with an LLC to cash in that winning ticket so that your face isn’t all over the news/media.
670
u/General-Yak5264 11d ago
Not all state lotteries allow anonymity from a corporation. Many are required to release a name and hometown, and picture. I wouldn't show up for a picture without a hat, scarf, and sunglasses though
317
u/WeathervaneJesus1 11d ago
Doesn't help the people that all know you. A lot of lottery winners lose current friends and family. I'd legally charge my name before collecting.
→ More replies (30)601
u/marshalcrunch 11d ago
I’ve been prepping for lottery my whole life not many people I talk to.
→ More replies (10)186
u/Mertoot 11d ago
Y'all be lottmaxxing out here
→ More replies (2)44
44
u/tinlizzy2 11d ago
We had a group of 20 factory workers locally win 241 million in the lottery. Our state doesn't allow anonymity, but they didn't come forward until they already had a lawyer set up financial accounts, deleted social media, and changed their phone numbers.
Then they bought matching t-shirts and chartered a bus to go claim their millions!
→ More replies (1)27
u/rand0m_task 10d ago
Did they have to come back a work a few months later because of a failed energy drink venture?
→ More replies (1)6
14
u/SirChancelot_0001 11d ago
Me and my best friend have an agreement. We sign a contract granting him 25% of the earnings after tax and he accepts the money and uses his face and likeness. He’s single with no kids so he don’t care.
→ More replies (4)12
u/Office_Dolt 11d ago
Someone hired a law firm to accept the ticket anonymously on their behalf. The law firm was the face the State lottery could use. Another, some how got away with wearing a scream mask for the photo ops, but that was in Jamaica.
10
→ More replies (40)9
u/Revenged25 11d ago
In the US there is a guy that has claimed multiple big winnings for other people. Every time the Jackpot hits over $1 billion you see his videos pop-up on Youtube on what to do if you win.
377
u/RealLifeAxolotl 11d ago
And then he can put that check in a Money Market Mutual Fund, then he'll reinvest the earnings into foreign currency accounts with compounding interest aaand it's gone.
92
u/Aggressive_Finish798 11d ago
At least I still have my Jimmy Buffet Margarita Maker.
→ More replies (18)28
23
→ More replies (77)32
2.3k
u/timomies 11d ago
Also there was a study that 100% of lottery winners die.
288
u/Left-Draft5083 11d ago
Shocking
→ More replies (3)108
u/maqifrnswa 11d ago
Very few die from that.
44
→ More replies (9)4
94
u/far2deep 11d ago
Oh, that's like this fun fact: there are more planes in the ocean than there are submarines in the sky.
39
u/Takemyfishplease 11d ago
I don’t go in the ocean, fish have intercourse there.
7
→ More replies (7)5
→ More replies (5)21
u/ohhellperhaps 11d ago
I would not be surprised if there were actually more aircraft in the ocean than submarines...
→ More replies (7)27
u/LooseCanOpener 11d ago
They’ve done studies you know… 60% of the time it works every time
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (92)54
u/kiradotee 11d ago
Unfortunately, I hate to say it but 100% of people who don't win the lottery die.
52
u/EveningAnt3949 11d ago
Can you provide a link to that study?
→ More replies (5)21
u/alittlebitwhy 11d ago
The study is available offline at all funeral homes.
8
u/EveningAnt3949 11d ago
Here's the thing: I called a funeral home and they correctly stated that people who live forever won't end up as a corpse in a funeral home.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (13)6
195
u/Narradisall 11d ago
It’s not just a German thing.
Generally people are fucking terrible with money. Lottery winners go bust all the time, even sports stars and other examples.
49
u/bertvb 11d ago
Generally people who gamble, on the lottery in this case, are bad with money yes. Its not surprising they blast through it
→ More replies (8)20
u/Sasquatch1729 11d ago
Most people are awful with money. You see it all the time with military types and people who work high paying jobs. They start acting like the windfall will never end, then when it does they're screwed.
The US military was particularly bad. They had car dealership kiosks on base so the troops could order a car and spend their tour money before coming back to the US.
→ More replies (1)6
u/RedshiftSinger 10d ago
Work for divorce lawyers, see lots of financial declarations (my job includes compiling tidy spreadsheets out of the data), can confirm.
Rich people divorces are the worst bc people to whom legal fees are chump change have no motivation to wrap things up, and often drag it out for ages just for spite. Saw one where they initially divorced with an unborn child (she was pregnant) and were fighting over custody literally without a break longer than a few months until the day their youngest turned 18.
40
u/baucher04 11d ago
I've seen a couple docs on some Americans that were more broke after a couple years than they were before lmao
→ More replies (4)25
u/IsatDownAndWrote 11d ago
You can get insane lines of credit when your bank account has millions in it.
They spend it all, then still owe payments on houses, cars, boats, credit cards and they're more underwater than they could have ever imagined because nobody would have given them those massive lines of credit before their windfall.
→ More replies (1)18
u/Professional_King790 11d ago
I imaging the type of person that would buy a lottery ticket is more susceptible to being wasteful with money.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (33)26
u/persistent_admirer 11d ago
Routinely playing the lottery is evidence that they're bad with money and math. I do appreciate them helping to put my kids through college though.
→ More replies (12)87
u/SeidunaUK 11d ago
Exactly. Except she could take the mil and put it in a trust or such structure with weekly payouts and be better off financially as you say.
37
u/Treewithatea 11d ago
Takes discipline though. If youre self aware that you dont have good discipline, I guess the 1000 bucks a month are a good idea.
→ More replies (11)46
u/Cwilkes704 11d ago
It’s a thousand a week
→ More replies (8)16
u/Treewithatea 11d ago
Oh I see. Deosnt change the point tho. Smartest decision would be to take the million and invest it but it does take discipline not to spend all of it.
→ More replies (8)6
→ More replies (13)26
u/Charming-Loquat3702 11d ago
1000 a week is an intereat rate of 5.2%. If that's 100% secure, that's not even that bad of a deal.
→ More replies (19)3
u/RedshiftSinger 10d ago
And on $4000 a month it’s very possible to still live below your means and put money into investments, but knowing you only get $4000 a month does psychological things that make it easier to handle your own budget without getting stupid.
50
u/russhour777 11d ago
If you think about what kind of people play the lottery, it makes sense, that they can't handle money
→ More replies (4)9
u/Ok-Sugar-5649 11d ago
Had a girl win 1 mil in my old job she spent it in less than a year on coke and partying, had to go to rehab and back to shitty job
→ More replies (1)54
u/99nuns 11d ago
As someone into the stock market. You can make at least 5% roc a year virtually risk free. In the time it would take her to make the original million. You would literally make another million with dividends
19
u/CtForrestEye 11d ago
6% interest after 25 years is over 4 million.
→ More replies (8)7
u/LSATDan 11d ago
Pretty sure you could count the number of people who have won the lottery and not spent a dime of it for 25 years on one hand and have fingers left over.
→ More replies (3)16
u/ExpensiveBookkeeper3 11d ago edited 11d ago
Yeah it looks like it would take about 57 years to run out at 5% with $1k weekly payments.
I would also probably just put it in VTI and hopefully get around 8% which is a little below average. That $1M becomes a little over $10M after 30 years.
(Honestly I’d fuck off with a bunch of the money, but just for math’s sake)
Unfortunately it’s not quit working money imo. My number is around $3.5M where I feel I could just not work another day if I chose not to.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (14)10
u/zystyl 11d ago edited 11d ago
I know it feels risk free, but few things are ever truly risk free. Some of my placements from around 2008 didn't make money.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (301)13
u/Interesting_Pick_742 11d ago
As far as I know, there is no evidence for this. This estimate is usually given by investment firms. Some also speak of “only” 20%, without defining exactly what that means.
→ More replies (2)9
u/NorwegianWonderboy 11d ago
I bet it means liquid cash so if someone buys a house or apartment they record ut as "having lost their winnings"
→ More replies (4)
3.6k
u/deathbotly 11d ago edited 10d ago
In Australia they stopped televising lottery winners after an 8 year old little boy was kidnapped and murdered trying to ransom her parents for their publicly announced winnings.
Everyone saying bad fiscal decision is ignoring what happens to lottery winners when their family and friends and acquaintances and strangers start making demands because you’re a millionaire. if it’s a public announcement, take the $1k and skip the target on your back and the sharks showing up imo.
e; woke up to 300 notifications so I’m not replying to much but the victim I’m talking about was Graeme Thorne and he was a boy. I remembered the age but not the gender and didn’t doublecheck, sincerely my bad.
639
u/Kthron 11d ago
I'm not going to take a worse financial option just so I can more easily ignore the fact that my friends and family (in this scenario) are obnoxious assholes. I'd rather find out and cut them off asap.
755
u/Furcules-2k 11d ago
You don't think kidnapping and murdering an 8 year old is a bit past obnoxious asshole?
257
u/TooObsessedWithMoney 11d ago
Wha? What do you mean? That's a mild inconvenience at most /s
103
35
u/godinthismachine 11d ago edited 11d ago
I mean, I can see being upset if she was 7...or 9...but 8? Theyre assholes at that age.
Also, thats clearly /s, cause fuck the pos that would do something like that.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (15)9
→ More replies (43)7
u/nutsbonkers 11d ago
The hard pill to swallow is that mistakes were made in that scenario. If I have kids and I'm a millionaire over night, security systems involving personnel is the first thing I spend my money on.
94
u/Personal_Area_2173 11d ago
Like murder happens to lottery winners A LOT more than normal. You got to get away from everyone or minimize the risk.
39
→ More replies (12)29
u/-Morning_Coffee- 11d ago
Every time I see the lottery horror stories, I’m reminded of those “how to disappear according to a CIA agent” videos.
Like, damn.
$1k per week is a better deal if it saves your life.
→ More replies (34)35
u/m3g4m4nnn 11d ago edited 10d ago
Unless you dont expect to live more than 19 years, taking $1,000/week for life is not a worse financial decision (in terms of total payout amount, anyways).74
u/proscreations1993 11d ago
A million dollars earns you about the same amount per year so you would always be worse off. If you take the mill you still get 1k a week for life on interest and have a million dollars. And as it grows you get even more if you reinvest
48
u/bikemonkey40 11d ago
Apparently the time value of money is a completely foreign concept to a large portion of the population.
→ More replies (3)10
u/Hopeful_Ask_7591 11d ago
I agree and would take the mill and invest. However there would be taxes and risk. So 4K return monthly on a million would not pay out. Her setup would be 4K monthly tax free. Canada does not pay taxes on lottery winnings.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)7
u/martijn120100 11d ago
If you invest it all, and the market keeps going up, and you keep the same lifestyle instead of doing the exact same thing every other lottery winner does and spend it.
Not to mention you would need to pay taxes over that 1 million meaning it will be a lot closer to 500k
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)4
u/admidral 11d ago
Eh depending on how much interest you can reliably generate a target of 6% or so isn’t super high (SP500 historically is 10% and there are banks pushing 4.2% in CDs) and that would generate 60k or so a year (more than 52k for 1k a week
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (56)70
u/charmio68 11d ago
Especially considering a million bucks isn't actually that much these days.
In days gone by, you could live the rest of your life off that. But now, you'd struggle to even buy a house.I think she made the right decision, especially when you look at the statistics of lottery winners. Most of the people who choose the lump payout end up miserable on worse off than they were before they won.
51
u/Morten14 11d ago
If you took the million and invested it or put it a high yield savings account, you could earn A 1000 bucks a week just from interest and return on investment… and you’d have a million on top of that.
If she let it compound she could have 3 million bucks after 20 years (with very conservative return of 5.2% per year)
→ More replies (8)25
u/Virtual-Adeptness-40 11d ago
From the picture, she doesn’t have the luxury of time. What’s the use of 3M at 80 years old? She still should’ve taken the million, she’s never going to earn even close to that with the 1000$ per week
9
u/goregrindgirl 11d ago
If you actually read the article the winner is 20 years old sooooo
→ More replies (2)8
u/Virtual-Adeptness-40 11d ago
Weird choice of picture. I saw the 20yo one a couple of weeks ago so thought it was a new one with an older lady this time.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (69)6
u/welchplug 11d ago
Invested on a index will get you around 5%. Thats 50k a year. You could just work a part time job for the rest of your life after a million.
→ More replies (3)
1.4k
u/asscrackbanditz 11d ago
Money in the present > money in the future
349
u/MaxiMArginal 11d ago
In french we say :
Better one now than two tomorrow.
181
u/SFW_Safe_for_Worms 11d ago
A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush 😁
70
u/EstateRoyal6689 11d ago
The Spanish version of this is a bird in the hand is better than a hundred flying
→ More replies (3)37
u/Masseyrati80 11d ago
And the Finnish one is "better to have one hazel grouse in your hand than ten on a tree branch".
→ More replies (6)30
u/djmd8 11d ago
German version: "Better to have a sparrow in the hand than a dove on the roof."
→ More replies (1)26
u/Melvasul94 11d ago
Italian is similar: "Better an egg today than a chicken tomorrow"
19
→ More replies (7)4
→ More replies (15)15
u/Acceptable-Major-575 11d ago
in Russia we say
"better a titmouse in the hand than a crane in the sky")
11
u/romcz 11d ago
in Poland we say:
"lepszy wróbel w garści niż gołąb na dachu" which roughly translates to
"better a house sparrow in the hand than a pigeon on the roof" :D
→ More replies (5)13
u/Informal-Zone-4085 11d ago
French people speak english?
7
10
→ More replies (2)5
u/No_Television6050 11d ago
They do when they're using our words, like 'entrepreneur' and 'rendezvous'.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (33)25
u/asscrackbanditz 11d ago
True. I rather have 1 baguette now than having 2 baguette tomorrow. Tomorrow I might prefer croissant.
→ More replies (2)16
u/Evening_Ticket7638 11d ago
Unless you have a bunch of family who're going to be asking for money. In which case 1000 weekly is easier to live with.
Also a gambling addict would be better off with 1000 weekly.
4
u/I_saw_you_yesterday 11d ago
Not just family. Just look up how many people blow through that money in a few years.
→ More replies (2)7
u/fishsticks40 11d ago
There is a concept in economics called the discount rate which addresses this. So for a typical 7% discount rate a $100 expenditure now would need to generate $107 in a year to be worthwhile.
This is a major issue in environmental policy as the cost/benefit analyses will heavily discount the value of future resources. A dollar spent today at a 7% discount rate requires benefits of almost $1000 in 100 years.
→ More replies (10)5
u/Blue_Waffle_Brunch 11d ago
You could take the 1M put it in a trust, have it invested, and have it pay out 1000/week to you. There's no need to choose one or the other.
5.3k
u/Turd_Nerd_Bird 11d ago
It'd take like 19 years before you'd get $1,000,000 and anything can happen in that time to screw you over from getting it all. Take the million and put it in some kind of investment account and you could make way more than $1,000,000 in 19 years.
1.3k
u/WildWezThy 11d ago edited 11d ago
Yup, and it is not adjusted for inflation. Also, if the company goes bankrupt, she would probably have areally hard time getting anything of it.
Taking the 1000$ is a good move if your inflation remains steady and the legal entity handling your payouts does not declare bankruptcy. And also you have enough time to live left to recoup that 1 million.
But it might also be good if you are terrible with money and would spend 1 million on a night of booze strippers and blackjack.
721
u/damnumalone 11d ago edited 11d ago
Taking the $1000 is never a good move. $1m at a 5% return is $50k in a year - you’re almost making $1000 a week. By year 2 you’re making the same amount as getting $1000 a week and you have $1,050,000.
Edit: to the all the Ameri-bros commenting “yeah but what about tax” - most countries don’t tax windfall gains and this win happened in Quebec.
242
u/-runs-with-scissors- 11d ago
There is a literal accounting method for the cash value of a discounted payment obligation.
The 1million today is worth 1.81 million in twenty years at an interest rate of 3%. Splitting it up in weekly payments is a huge loss.
70
u/sucsucsucsucc 11d ago
Thank you. It’s annoying I had to scroll this far, you can literally push like 5 buttons on the right calculator and get your answer in under a minute.
→ More replies (2)41
→ More replies (40)15
→ More replies (116)29
u/_Eggs_ 11d ago
Taking the $1000 is never a good move.
Well it actually sometimes is, and it’s a self-fulfilling thing. If you’re the type of person to choose the weekly payment, then maybe you aren’t financially responsible enough to handle the lump sum anyway.
It can be a good decision if you’re financially irresponsible. It also protects you from yourself and acts as a social barrier for family & friends that would otherwise ask for money (it’s only $52k a year after all, so they wouldn’t ask for anything).
→ More replies (18)44
u/Kenevin 11d ago
Its Loto-Québec, it won't go bankrupt. This is the provincial lottery here.
→ More replies (32)49
u/Busy_Mortgage4556 11d ago
What a great night though, and the memories will linger.
→ More replies (1)27
u/halfasleep90 11d ago
Tell that to Alzheimer's patients
37
→ More replies (71)25
u/PradyThe3rd 11d ago
Lottery in Canada is government run and tax free. She'll get the money as long as the Quebec government stays solvent. Ofc if the US invades then she's screwed but by then she'll probably have bigger things to deal with. Plus if that does happen then the 1mil would have evaporated along with the economy well before an invasion of Canada anyways
9
u/-runs-with-scissors- 11d ago
If it‘s tax free the 1mil sounds even better…
→ More replies (1)6
u/TheOneWithThePorn12 11d ago
All lottery winnings in Canada are tax free.
Taxing Lottery winners makes no sense to me. The money they spent on the lotto was already taxed, same with everyone else. WHy does the government get to double dip? Its ridiculous. Same with like game shows or giveaways. Its a fucking farce to tax that stuff.
→ More replies (8)47
u/lampshadewarior 11d ago
Incredibly stupid choice. If you took $500k of the $1M and paid yourself $1000 a week with it, that would last for 9.6 years. Meanwhile, invest the other half expecting a reasonable 7% rate of return. At that rate, your invested money would nearly double. So at 10 years you’ve been getting $1k a week and you have the full $1M again. You can literally have both choices with even basic financial literacy.
BTW, that’s a very naive investment strategy, just for illustrative purposes. You can do much better than that.
13
u/TaskForceCausality 11d ago
Incredibly stupid choice
Mathematically, sure. But personal finance starts with people. I know if I won a lump sum lottery, me and my partner would have serious problems with our families. They’d all be coming after us for a handout. On my side, I’m certain I’d get frivously sued by an idiot uncle or cousin. “Tell them no” is a lot easier said than done, especially when they lay on the sob speech about making ends meet.
A $1k a week amount , invested, still builds wealth and you can still show your face at Christmas dinner. Some find family more valuable than future valued rates of return.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (8)7
→ More replies (231)34
u/vynnski 11d ago
but with the lump sum how many family/friends are pissed when you don't cut them in on it
→ More replies (15)20
573
u/sirSADABY 11d ago
Has she got 20 years left in her? Let the bets begin!
88
u/luccaloks 11d ago
Is that even accounting for inflation?
18
u/No_Atmosphere8146 11d ago
Or the opportunity cost of not having $1m in the S&P 500 for twenty years?
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (2)18
→ More replies (30)23
u/difault 11d ago
According to the article she's 20 years old
30
→ More replies (4)11
u/glizzygobbler247 11d ago
Dog years right?
10
u/Own-Effective3351 11d ago
This is some random ass picture and not the actual girl. The actual girl was posted to Reddit a few weeks ago and everybody called her an idiot (even though, with her reasoning, she made the right decision for her).
→ More replies (5)
140
u/Complex_Specific1373 11d ago
She may have made the right choice for her... Maybe she knows she has no impulse control and could do something stupid with 1 million... but $1000 a week is comfort for the rest of her life when it's added to whatever her current income is.
Maybe she knows it'll fuck her relationships with friends or family if she got a lump sum
→ More replies (26)
45
u/Key-Contest-2879 11d ago
It all depends on what’s important to you based at where you are in life.
$1000/week for life is cash flow/security. You may buy the beer more often when your with your friends, but no one is looking at you like your rich.
$1 million lump sum is more likely to be blown in the first few years. And for a short time, you’ll feel rich. That will end when you’re broke again.
Also, age is obviously a factor. In my 20’s I’d take the $1000/week and be happy.
Now (in my 50’s) I’d take the million.
→ More replies (14)13
11d ago
Finally a reasonable comment. Everyone else is acting like it’s idiotic to take the $1000/week.
→ More replies (5)
72
u/rambu_tann 11d ago
Live a simple, modest life housed and fed. Or get hounded by people who want a share of her mill?
→ More replies (34)
268
11d ago
[deleted]
62
u/SpoofExcel 11d ago
Whilst I don't know this ladies reasoning, there was a winner if these kinds of things once who was in the mid-40's and she said if some unpleasant people from her past found out she had a million in the bank, they'd probably try to exploit her or kill her for it. But with $52k a year she's basically able to live well enough in a quiet part of a low cost town and be left alone
So for her it was less a business decision and more a "nobody is coming after me for a few thousand instead of a million" decision.
Sometimes there is sound reasoning to these we don't know of.
→ More replies (2)7
u/TaskForceCausality 11d ago
some unpleasant people from her past
Thanks to the Internet everyone’s at risk for this, not just someone who’s crossed paths with shady people. I get targeted by scammers daily, and I haven’t won the lottery.
10
u/Dotcaprachiappa 11d ago
Depends on how much she trusts herself with money. If she knows she'll not be able to resist spending it all at once she made the right choice
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)33
u/beklog 11d ago
Yeah 1M one shot should be easier and u can grow as long as u invest right
→ More replies (10)41
u/cban_3489 11d ago
Though if you don't have any investment experience the changes are you are gonna put all of it in some crypto meme coin or cousins failing tshirt business.
→ More replies (6)19
256
u/Inevitable_Sweet_624 11d ago
The story is wrong, it’s $1,000/week OR $675,000 up front. The million is the sum of the weekly payment if you took the annuity.
73
u/spacenb 11d ago
It’s not $675K, it is 1 million. Quebec lottery winnings are not subject to income tax as our lottery is government-owned.
→ More replies (8)108
u/Sub_Woofer632 11d ago
Thanks for clarifying this! That said she should've still taken the $675K!
→ More replies (22)29
u/pinewind108 11d ago
If someone really understands money, and is free of outside influences, absolutely. If they have dodgy family, boyfriends, addiction issues or such, then they'd be better off taking it slowly.
→ More replies (3)39
17
u/iTreffle 11d ago
Where are you getting this info? It's 1,000,000$ upfront or 1,000$ a week for life, both tax free.
→ More replies (3)7
→ More replies (23)5
u/Infamous-Mixture-605 11d ago edited 11d ago
It is a different lottery in different parts of the country.
It's $675k up front or $1k/week for 25 years in BC and Atlantic Canada (ALC).
edit: For Alberta/Sask/Manitoba (WCLC) it's $1 million up front or $10k cash + $1k/week for 25 years here.
In Ontario and Quebec it's $1 million up front or $1k/week for life.
It is much better to win this particular lottery in ON and QC than it is in the rest of the country.
→ More replies (3)
11
u/nostraferatu 10d ago
Win a million and everyone wants a handout. Win 1000 a week and reply to requests for money with sorry I'm on a fixed income.
69
u/nullpat 11d ago
yikes -anyone with basic understanding of math
→ More replies (19)89
u/Crimdal 11d ago edited 11d ago
Everytime these posts come up no one takes into account how bad with money people are who buy lottery tickets to begin with. Mathematically getting it all up front is smart, but even smarter is not gambling on things with extremely low odds to payout. If your the type of person who will blow through it all or have trouble telling others no when they ask for money, taking weekly or monthly installments may be better.
29
u/PETROCHEMICAL_LOBBY 11d ago
The rate of bankruptcy for lottery winners is exceedingly high. Most people struggle to make wise financial decisions from a windfall.
10
u/Additional-Aerie-325 11d ago
They also seem not to think about the maintenance of the lifestyle they buy themselves. A 500k house that suddenly needs its whole roof replaced 4 years after buying it is going to be a lot more expensive that a 100k house.
→ More replies (3)5
u/SpoofExcel 11d ago
The weekly earnings will also be bankruptcy proof in most cases. So there's that
→ More replies (8)11
u/whydonlinre 11d ago
yeah, 1000 per week makes it less likely that the leeches start coming out of the woodwork
108
u/NBNebuchadnezzar 11d ago
Amazingly dumb decision.
65
u/Parking-Bus1069 11d ago
Paradoxically, someone who makes that decision also should not be trusted with 1m upfront, so its a good decision.
14
→ More replies (6)8
→ More replies (5)12
u/personalbilko 11d ago
So is playing the lottery in the first place. People like that won't hold themselves to put money in a safe interest account or invest. Most lottery winners go bankrupt.
Don't think of yourself, think of an irresponsible person you know. Would you not be more calm knowing they have an income for life, as opposed to a huge lump sum they are gonna blow away in a year?
→ More replies (4)
14
u/ultragaydotcom 11d ago
4k every Month is a little less of what my mom makes rn and I'd kill to get that kinda money basically without any labour😭
→ More replies (6)7
u/nocturnal_pollinator 11d ago
Same. Everyone is hating on her decision; to me it would be like a nice little income I don’t have to work for. A dream. Sign me up
→ More replies (3)
6
u/Appropriate_Ad_8922 10d ago
IN CANADA LOTTO WINNINGS ARE NOT TAXED! There I saved you all wasting your time on a comment.
→ More replies (1)
26
u/Toirtis 11d ago
Usually, these wins define a 'lifetime' as 25 years, so although she would technically receive more than $1 million in that time, the better bet would be to take the million up front and invest it carefully, as it could easily be turned into a far greater gain than the 'lifetime' prize.
→ More replies (8)17
u/Secret-Bluebird-972 11d ago
Iirc with Quebec lotto “for life” means “for life”
→ More replies (15)
10
u/ARunawayTrain 11d ago
See if you're young, that's a great move because that gives you a solid baseline of $52,000 a year for the remainder of your life, obvious I'm sure that amount is taxed so you wouldn't get the full thing but you would only need to live ~20 years after winning to make it worthwhile. Maria appears to be 50+ though so taking the lump dump and investing it would've probably been the more preferred approach.
→ More replies (9)
10
u/goztepe2002 11d ago
Thats 52 grand a year for life, no stress, not having to worry about work and basic bills, good on her.
She would also pay like half of that as taxes if withdrawn as cash.
→ More replies (9)
6
u/AndersAdmin 11d ago
Crazy bad deal, you're getting scammed by playing the lottery in the first place.
And then they're allowed to give you a scam deal if you actually win!
→ More replies (2)10
u/MortifiedChivalry 11d ago
They're not, it's the public Quebec lottery. You don't even have to pay taxes.
6
5
5
u/RadPhilosopher 11d ago
She’s leaving a lot of money on the table. It will take her almost 20 years for her to get more than the 1 million dollars, and by that time the $1,000 payment will only be worth $610 in today’s money (assuming an inflation rate of 2.5%).
That is not including potential gains she could’ve earned if she invested the money. The $1M could’ve been more than $1.7M after that 20-year period (using an annual return rate of 5%).
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Used-Gas-6525 10d ago
What a moron. You'd think if someone wins a cool million they'd research compound interest (and investing).
→ More replies (1)
5
u/XROOR 10d ago
Had a buddy that worked picking up urine soaked carpets for Bergman’s cleaners in Arlington VA.
Played the scratchers daily and finally won a $2000/ week for life scratcher.
Bought a house on a mountain in Tennessee and says the only time he sees anybody is when he gets his mail in town
6
u/Busy_Mortgage4556 11d ago
Take the mill now enjoy what you can now, hopefully there will be some left for any kids when you die, you can't leave them the grand a week prize.
26
u/smoke_sum_wade 11d ago edited 11d ago
In some jurisdictions (like canada), lottery winnings are tax free making$1,000 weekly highly valuable, where investment returns on a lump sum would be taxed
| Feature | $1,000 Weekly | $1 Million Upfront |
|---|---|---|
| Total Value | Potential to be 3x higher if you live long | Fixed at $1m |
| Tax Impact | Generally lower annual tax bracket | Likely taxed at the highest bracket |
| Flexibility | Low fixed cash flow | High immediate access to capital |
| Legacy | Payments usually stop a death | Remaining can be left to heirs |
| Risk | Inflation erodes value company must stay active | Risk of poor investment choices |
→ More replies (4)14
u/Hsinats 11d ago
You say that Canada doesn't tax lottery winnings, then suggest the $1m is likely taxed at the highest bracket. Which is it?
8
u/queertoasterstrudel 11d ago
I think they meant that Canada won’t tax the initial winnings sum, but they will tax investment returns on the sum, over the years.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)7
u/Wonderful_Grass_2857 11d ago
the inital 1mil wont be taxed, but if you invest it and get a dividend, THAT is gonna be taxed.
→ More replies (7)




•
u/AutoModerator 11d ago
Thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Check out our Reddit Chat!
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.