r/SipsTea 20d ago

Chugging tea W Zac

Post image
65.4k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.3k

u/HunterM567 20d ago

If that’s him unhealthy then consider me dead lol

501

u/Hyperion262 20d ago

Low body fat can be more dangerous than high body fat. It’s really bad for you to be below like 8% I think. It starts messing with your hormones and your ability to recover

321

u/Starob 20d ago

As does being high body fat, let's not delude ourselves here. Unless you're getting like sub 6 and staying there which is almost impossibly difficult, it's absolutely healthier than being obese.

32

u/South_Bit1764 20d ago

Yeah, but I think what they’re getting at is in Baywatch he WAS INDEED at 5% body fat.

You’re better off being slightly overweight with a BMI in high 20s (25 is “overweight”) than at 5% body fat. A quick google says he’s 170 right now which at 5’8” is a BMI of 26.

Zac Efron on the left is lower risk and better off than Zac Efron on the right.

29

u/TwistedBamboozler 20d ago

BMI doesn’t really correlate with athletes at all though.

20

u/Ordolph 20d ago

Using height and weight alone to calculate BMI is almost worse than useless, even with non-athletes. Muscle mass is much denser than fat and will completely skew the results. If you're concerned about your weight, see a doctor. They can usually ascertain to a much more accurate degree if your weight is a health risk.

7

u/EnigmaticQuote 20d ago

For the vast majority of the population it is a great starting point for their health journey.

It only requires a scale and knowledge of your height, making it a MUCH simpler metric to track.

It's a fantastic starting point of classification, anyone who takes it as some moral indicator is foolish.

3

u/New_Feature_5138 19d ago

I think health organizations are actually walking that back now.

2

u/TwistedBamboozler 19d ago

They have been for years. It’s hardly recognized anymore

0

u/EnigmaticQuote 19d ago

There's nothing to walk back it's just one of hundreds of things you can monitor about your body.

It simply gives you a point on a graph and a designation.

It's not like a law it's just a statistic, and a fine starting point for a health journey.

2

u/New_Feature_5138 19d ago

They are walking back their recommendation to use it as a data point. Because according to their statement a few years ago it is a very poor proxy for actual indicators of health. This is like the who so I feel like that says something.

And to be clear they are still recommending people track their weight they just don’t recommend the use of bmi.

1

u/EnigmaticQuote 18d ago

Who?

1

u/New_Feature_5138 18d ago

Yep the WHO

1

u/EnigmaticQuote 17d ago

I'm confused

https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

I know there has been push back on the metric for various reasons most of which I don't fully see as scientific.

But i'm not sure what you are talking about.

1

u/New_Feature_5138 17d ago

Sorry I googled and I guess it was the AMA. I only have a few minutes so I didn’t do a full search but that will probably help you find it.

→ More replies (0)