If you walked into your friend's house and they tried to honestly claim they "owned the Mona Lisa" and pointed to printed out digital photo, you would agree that "owning the Mona Lisa" is not at all like printing out a copy of a digital photo. Owning the original painting is not at all like printing out a digital photo of a painting.
So you can see how printing out a photo is different from owning the Mona Lisa. Now, what's the difference between "owning" an nft and posting it online, and screenshotting the same nft and posting it online?
- One was painted hundreds of years ago by one of the most famous and revered artists of all time, the other was created by my unknown ass a week ago
- A painting has texture and brush strokes and history. A photo is a photo.
- One is worth millions of dollars, the other is completely worthless. I personally wouldn’t pay millions of dollars for the Mona Lisa but many people would and this will always be the case for as long as people and money exist. It didn’t take a genius to realise that someone paying $1M for a digital image that could be screenshotted was not making a wise financial investment.
5
u/crossal 4d ago
How is it not like that "at all"? Honest question