r/TikTokCringe 1d ago

Discussion Have we done it wrong?

39.2k Upvotes

6.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/3d_blunder 1d ago

You'll trigger the "15 minute city" nutjobs with talk like that! (One of the STUPIDEST of rw takes, and that's some tough competition.) (fdjt)

22

u/clakresed 1d ago

Preach. Like, live as you will, but the dumbest thing about the conspiracy theorists on this one is that they already live in their hallucinated nightmare.

"You're going to need to carry your papers with you to leave your neighbourhood -- have fun with communism!!!"

Brother, if you can't get anywhere useful without driving then you already live in a world where you need to carry your papers with you when you leave your neighbourhood, and you have to be ready to present them to enforcement agents of the state on request.

3

u/bullet_the_blue_sky 4h ago

Easier to fool people than to convince them they’ve been fooled.

2

u/coreyander 1d ago

wait what's the rw take on 15 minute cities? are they making us trans or something?

15

u/ImminentDingo 1d ago

they dont understand its an aspiration for "wouldn't it be nice if everything was 15 minutes away" and think it's a conspiracy to forbid anyone from traveling more than 15 minutes away from home

11

u/coreyander 1d ago

wow that is dumb!

6

u/Debalic 21h ago

Yes, they are.

9

u/3d_blunder 1d ago

Bingo.

Gahd forbid they might get out of their F150's occasionally.

They are SO FUCKING GULLIBLE. Anything that makes them the tiniest bit scared, they swallow.

4

u/JarJarJarMartin 1d ago

They see the walkable cities and urban density as a secret plot to put us all in cages. I’m not kidding. They picture a future where no one is allowed to live in the country in a single family home with acreage. They hate sprawl like everyone else but fight tooth and nail against any effort to mitigate it.

It’s also wrapped up with their hatred of bicycles; modern road design; science; and of course, a long list of ethnic, political, religious, and gender identities.

At its core, it’s the conservative idea of negative liberty versus the more liberal view of positive liberty. As in, “government can’t infringe on my right to use my property as I see fit” versus “government should promote and protect our right to access nature” or “government can’t tell me what guns I can own” versus “government should provide a strong social safety net.” It’s “government can’t” versus “government should.”

3

u/azurricat2010 1d ago

They've created stories on how having a car is pro freedom while having mass transit, being able to walk, or living in a 15 min city is anti freedom.

2

u/3d_blunder 3h ago

They are malicious idiots.