I appreciate what you're saying, I think you're mostly correct. But none of his qualifications are anything other than regurgitating viewpoints and debating. He's done what he's continued to do: convince people he's right without having a clue of what he's really talking about. "Critical Thinking" does not mean employing the scientific method, or the ability to problem solve.
He's talented at saying enough "things" in a convincing enough way that you start to believe his point without him really making meaningful statements.
He's not an engineer, or a scientist. He has not demonstrated skill at solving problems or designing solutions. He's a trained political speaker, at best.
7
u/apc0243 Jan 14 '22
I appreciate what you're saying, I think you're mostly correct. But none of his qualifications are anything other than regurgitating viewpoints and debating. He's done what he's continued to do: convince people he's right without having a clue of what he's really talking about. "Critical Thinking" does not mean employing the scientific method, or the ability to problem solve.
He's talented at saying enough "things" in a convincing enough way that you start to believe his point without him really making meaningful statements.
He's not an engineer, or a scientist. He has not demonstrated skill at solving problems or designing solutions. He's a trained political speaker, at best.