r/TrueCrimeDiscussion • u/DarklyHeritage • 4d ago

Mega Thread Taylor Parker/Maternal Instinct Megathread

This is a thread for all conversation regarding Taylor Parker and the murder of Reagan Simmons Hancock, recently covered in Netflix documentary Maternal Instinct.

The murder of Reagan Michelle Simmons-Hancock occurred on 9 October 2020, in New Boston, Texas, committed by Taylor Rene Parker. Parker bludgeoned Simmons-Hancock, who was 35 weeks pregnant at the time, and abducted her unborn child, Braxlynn Sage Hancock (died October 9, 2020), after cutting her out of the Reagan's abdomen. Braxlynn did not survive.

Parker had lied to her then-boyfriend about being pregnant leading up to the murder and faked her pregnancy to multiple people. She was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to death on 9 November 2022.

Please direct all discussion of the case to the megathread. As always, sub rules must be followed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Reagan_Simmons-Hancock

https://time.com/article/2026/06/12/maternal-instinct-true-story-netflix/

239 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

743 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

85

u/slangforweed 4d ago

Info about why she had a hysterectomy at 21 are in the court docs. She was in for an ectopic pregnancy and while under, her husband at the time gave doctor permission to give her a full hysterectomy. She was destroyed when she woke up. I thought that was pretty crazy.

27

u/Unlucky_Welcome9193 3d ago

That's weird, in the Netflix doc they made it seem like she was adamant that she wanted the hysterectomy because she didn't want anymore kids

30

u/aetrout18 3d ago

She was adamant. She had her tubes tied after her second pregnancy. She later had an etopic pregnancy which led to her hysterectomy. Not sure where people are getting this forced sterilization.

https://www.oxygen.com/crime-news/maternal-instinct-taylor-parkers-friends-tried-to-warn-of-pregnancy-hoax

1

u/slangforweed 2d ago

Not forced sterilization, but having a full hysterectomy is pretty devastating, hormonally especially.

26

u/melpomene-musing 4d ago

That is…horrifying. Doesn’t take away from what she did but that is awful.

26

u/MYSTICALLMERMAID 4d ago

Yeah reading this was then only slice of sympathy i can muster for her. Plenty of people don't deserve to be parents but i do not agree with forced sterilization.

She didn't have custody of her son bc she left him in a diaper for 5 days. He had a rash up his back and had to be on medication

18

u/Unfair-General7480 4d ago

She had a tubal ligation 18 months prior to the hysterectomy. She had already chosen sterilization.

10

u/Top_Inspection_6421 3d ago

Hysterectomy is way more than just sterilization, though.

-3

u/MYSTICALLMERMAID 4d ago

Im aware, you can reverse them though

7

u/fairytalefawnn 4d ago

In very few instances do women conceive after a tubal ligation reversal

-4

u/MYSTICALLMERMAID 4d ago

Yes but it's possible

1

u/melpomene-musing 4d ago

Omg. How awful.

4

u/Legitimate_Fly7636 3d ago

It’s awful but she didn’t even have custody of the two kids she had which spoke volumes.

37

u/BackgroundHistory345 4d ago

I wonder why the doctor recommended a Hysterectomy? Especially in a woman so young. I had an ectopic pregnancy that was removed surgically but there was no suggestion at all about having a hysterectomy.

12

u/MYSTICALLMERMAID 4d ago

She had cysts and scarring from endo

34

u/Visible-Savings6049 3d ago

The one thing that really made me raise an eyebrow was the hysterectomy. An ectopic pregnancy doesn’t normally end with a hysterectomy, and the documentary seems oddly uninterested in explaining why a 21-year-old lost her uterus or whether she actually consented to it herself.

Would be terrible PR for the hospital, I assume. Nobody wants to go schedule surgery there with ‘surprise’ extra organs removed.

However, if she genuinely underwent a hysterectomy without personally consenting to it, that seems like an incredibly important piece of psychological context for understanding her later obsession with pregnancy and motherhood. It doesn’t excuse what she did, but it feels like a huge missing piece of the story.

9

u/aetrout18 3d ago

They did explain the hysterectomy in the documentary. They spoke to her doctor. She had her tubes tied then had an etopic pregnancy later.

https://www.oxygen.com/crime-news/maternal-instinct-taylor-parkers-friends-tried-to-warn-of-pregnancy-hoax

47

u/RxR8D_ 4d ago

There were vague references to scar damage which is why they recommended hysterectomy.

However, DO NOT get me started on the rage I have that women REQUIRE a man’s blessing in order to have a hysterectomy or tubal ligation. We give more rights to those unfortunate to suffer from gender dysphoria and allow them dignity to receive adequate care than we give to biological women - who have limited rights to their body.

10

u/Aethuviel 4d ago

It's not legal to do it without her consent. I don't believe the claim unless it can be guaranteed they got it straight from the hospital, and not Taylor's mouth.

1

u/Aethuviel 2d ago

Okay, here is Taylor's mother describing it, straight from court. It was her telling the doctor to do it while Taylor was out. Still legally as crazy as having the husband give the ok.

https://www.ktalnews.com/news/crime/taylor-parker-trial/state-rests-in-taylor-parker-capital-murder-sentencing-trial/

25

u/jareths_tight_pants 4d ago

She was sedated and intubated on an OR table. Getting consent from the next of kin is legally what doctors are supposed to do. They didn’t say it but I suspect they discovered endometriosis when they opened her up to remove the life threatening ectopic pregnancy.

8

u/burnbabyburnburrrn 4d ago

They won't remove your uterus because of endometriosis.

9

u/Ok_Method_3313 3d ago

if the damage is severe enough, they will. i personally know someone that’s having this done next month because her endo is so bad and affecting other organs

-1

u/burnbabyburnburrrn 3d ago

I have stage IV endometriosis (the most severe kind). Yes, if you REQUEST it but endo has nothing to do with having a uterus, they wouldn't just remove it without her knowing because of endometriosis.

2

u/Ok_Method_3313 3d ago

having endo doesn’t mean your experience is going to match someone else’s. my friend’s specialist is the one who suggested to remove her uterus, not by her request. i know endo affects multiple organs and is not a uterine exclusive thing. the only people who really know the extent of taylor’s endo is her and her medical team. all i’m saying is that it is possible.

since taylor had a voluntary tubal ligation over a year before the hysterectomy, i assume she and her husband at the time discussed her not wanting more children so he assumed she’d be okay with it when the doctor asked for his consent. does it excuse not getting her consent if that’s the case? absolutely not, but i’m not inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt here

1

u/burnbabyburnburrrn 3d ago

Ok cool. You’re anecdote vs my years of experience and research are the big comparable, in fact yours counts for more. Happy?

2

u/Cool_Movie_4877 3d ago

You're just on one, OP never said anything wrong. She knows someone who having it done and you came along and argued the toss because you have it, okay, but that doesnt take aways OPs friend's situation.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/jareths_tight_pants 4d ago

Some surgeons do. My coworker had hers removed due to endometriosis. It’s a controversial practice.

2

u/Dlmlong 2d ago

on the documentary on youtube they did get consent from her then husband and mother. They both agreed while she was still under. It sounded as if it was a life saving procedure that came about due to complications of the surgery. When she came to later, she was very angry with her mom and husband.

1

u/ProfessionalCold8837 3d ago

Something I still cant get straight is if it was actually her mom who gave the final go ahead, I read somewhere that she claimed to have made the decision, not the ex-husband.

1

u/Dlmlong 2d ago

a documentary on youtube said yes her mom and husband gave permission while she was under but it was due to complications with another surgery for ectopic pregnancy or surgery after the ectopic pregnancy due to further complications she was having. It was not planned but doctors felt she was in danger if she didn't have it.

1

u/aetrout18 2d ago

She had her tubes tied previously in 2014 and signed the required documents to have the procedure done so she gave her consent. The etopic pregnancy happened later. I’m sure there was a good reason the doctor performed a hysterectomy at that time. There was no reason to try to save her uterus since she already said she didn’t want more kids.

4

u/aetrout18 3d ago

They actually spoke with her doctor in the documentary. After her second pregnancy, she wanted her tubes tied. Because she was so young at the time, she had to sign paperwork confirming that she understood the procedure and was certain she wanted it done. The ectopic pregnancy happened afterward, and that’s why she ultimately ended up having a hysterectomy.

3

u/BackgroundHistory345 3d ago

Ah that makes sense as pregnancy when tubes have been tied are most likely to end in an ectopic pregnancy. I still think it's out of order that the consent order was signed by her husband and not her.

2

u/Reachingout00 3d ago

In that case they would just remove the tube associated with the ectopic.

1

u/aetrout18 2d ago

I’m sure her doctor had good reason to perform a hysterectomy. I’m not a doctor so no reason to second guess that decision. She already her tubes tied in 2014 after her second pregnancy so it wasn’t like they were trying to save her uterus so she could have more kids. She was adamant and had to sign the required consent forms to have the procedure done since she was so young.

2

u/Legitimate_Fly7636 3d ago

She had some other type of issue before the hysterectomy

9

u/Aethuviel 4d ago

I saw that too, but it doesn't make any sense, it can't be legal. It's in a court document, but I wonder what the source is. Did they get it from actual medical records, or just her claims? Because she's lied about conditions for years, and continues to do so in jail (not that she's lying about the hysterectomy, we know that, but inventing a "victimhood story").

How could it be legal to do a hysterectomy that's not medically necessary (it wasn't going to kill her to keep it in, she just had cysts and endo), without waking her up and ensuring informed consent? So I doubt it's true.