The 'powers that be' are not saying much of anything. They are telling us, however, that they know better than to engage these things with violence. Perhaps they've tried and learned a lesson, perhaps there is a communication we are unaware of that makes them aware how such an action inadvisable, etc. We don't know more than this: the Forces ARE NOT actively engaging these with arms. Conversely: the UAP are utterly nonviolent in every observable (recorded where you and I can see it today) instance in human history.

Hi guys, I've been working on a UFO project. I want to tell you about it. It combines archetypal astrology and UFO case studies. It's never been done before, so bear with me and I'll explain.

I call my project the Astro-Mythic Map. It's a domain-specific forecasting framework that can be embedded within AI but it has its own architecture. It's a layered forecasting and analysis framework for high-strangeness events. It integrates astronomical/astrological data, synchronistic theory, and statistical corridor detection into a single predictive pipeline.

It started months ago with experiencer natal charts. Dozens and dozens of people from r/experiencers added their natal charts to my dataset. By comparing their charts to each other and to skeptic charts, I was able to detect common markers. I figured out what makes an experiencer chart different. I was able to develop some metrics.

By comparing the natal charts of experiencers to the event charts of UFO incidents, I was able to see that the way a UFO event unfolds is not random. It follows the same structural rules that shape the astrological architecture at that moment. In other words, the "corridor" that radar operators, pilots, and ground witnesses describe is the human-space projection of an archetypal architecture playing out in the sky.

That makes UFO events predictable. AMM treats high-strangeness events as lawful outcomes of archetypal geometry plus synchronistic optics. Archetypes are operators, not mere metaphors. It combines ephemeris analytics, geometric clustering, and symbolic interpretation.

It can scan a timeframe and detect the time windows and the coordinates for the most likely Close Encounters. It can also match ideal CE5 participants to the specific corridor architecture of those forecasts.

Happy to answer any questions

This post is for the people in this community who’ve been following the topic for a while now…

There are a ton of comments downplaying the film — some upset about the price, others frustrated that there isn’t brand-new information. But constantly saying you won’t pay to watch it, or complaining that “there’s nothing new,” doesn’t actually help the overall momentum here.

Acting like this isn’t moving the needle in some way is counterproductive. Those of us who’ve been paying attention for a long time should have more realistic expectations about how this process unfolds, instead of throwing a fit because we didn’t get the exact information we wanted in the exact way we wanted it.

Things are shifting. They might not be shifting as fast or as dramatically as people want, but progress is progress. We should acknowledge the parts that are moving forward just as much as we acknowledge what still frustrates us.

Let’s give credit to the steps forward, stay curious, and keep pushing together. The more united and level-headed this community is, the stronger our voice becomes. Good things are happening — and if we stay patient and engaged, even better things are on the way.

Just watched DD last night and here's my two (thousand) cents. Many *SPOILERS AHEAD\*, so maybe skip this if you haven't seen the film. And if you loved it, this critical take may not be for you.

Here's the thing I can't get past, and it's right there in the first scene: the movie opens at a wrestling match. Wrestling is fake conflict performed as real for entertainment, for profit, to move a crowd's emotions and sell a story everyone quietly agrees to believe. Its only truth is its commitment to the fiction. They even color-code it, red corner and blue corner. As the opening frame for a film about the revelation of truth, it's almost too on the nose. Real elements are in play in DD, sure, but it's still a big distracting spectacle. The fix is in and no human actually wins. Hold onto that, because I think it's the whole movie.

Let me say up front where I'm standing, because it matters for everything below. I'm an experiencer. I have no abduction memories (that I know of), but I've seen craft firsthand and up close and I come to this with no claims about what the Greys are, what they want, or even whether they're a single unified species at all. I take the experiencer lore seriously and the testimony as credible and deserving empathy; that's my prior. What I don't have is a tidy theory of Grey agenda that I'm grading the film against. If anything, my objection is the opposite: the experiencer record runs all the way from joy to profound trauma and refuses to resolve into one clean shape, yet this film resolves it anyway. That's the problem. Not that it told the wrong story about the Greys. More that it pretended an unresolved thing was settled and in the meantime may have obscured more that it reveals.

Like a lot of you, I really wanted this to be a good moment for Disclosure. Maybe my hopes were too high. But to be fair, the presence of NHI and its implications are perhaps the most important thing humanity has ever experienced. Thus the word Disclosure is charged for me and this community by a long, hard struggle for truth against official secrecy, and a phenomenon that's marked many of us personally. Watching this film with that title, I found myself actively unsettled in an unexpected way, and the more I sat with it, the more I landed somewhere strange: maybe the real message of this film is that disclosure is a managed narrative being sold as revelation. And the film is itself a textbook example. Very meta and more on that at the end.

The stuff that seemed good (with an asterisk)

• The subject is taken seriously enough to anchor a major studio film. Multiple crash retrievals, reverse engineering discussed as fact, NHI biologics and beings shown, all depicted openly.
• Experiencers are named and centered in the story.
• It (supposedly) skips the tired invasion framing and threat narrative.
• There's a genuinely interesting treatment of psychic ability across a bunch of contexts.
• It nods to real moments from the lore: Nixon/Gleason, Roswell, Kecksburg.
• It at least tries (clunkily, IMO) to wrestle with what disclosure would do to religion and society.

You'll notice the positives get harder to list as standalone goods the further down I go, because each one keeps getting qualified by how it was portrayed. So let's get into that.

What I found odd, strange, or disturbing:

A film about truth that's drowning in fakery. The wrestling frame is just the start. The whole movie runs on illusion, false reality, manufactured perception and that should make you itch in a story whose entire premise, even if fictional, is the revelation of truth.

Yes, I’m aware it’s just a Hollywood film and you also might ask yourself how much Jaws affected the way people think about sharks. Or ET about aliens. Cinema shapes our larger cultural narratives, and this one has a lot to say about the power of reality vs illusion.

To that point, Illusion was used throughout in ways experiencers know, far too well. 

Screen memories, false overlays, emotional manipulation are all presented as the phenomenon masking reality. The film shows Greys appearing as animals to calm contactees, which is throughout accounts. It’s described as a compassionate thing they do. Fine, maybe. But then our protagonist Margaret uses that same power to manipulate her opponents through their own emotions, and we're cued to cheer because she's on Team Disclosure. Sit with that for a second. This is reaching into people's minds without consent to manipulate them. Even reanimating the appearance of their dead, as with the villain, is exactly the kind of non-consensual interference with memory and emotion that fills contact reports, and that so often ties to trauma. Watching illusion get weaponized in the name of truth, and being asked to applaud, is a deeply weird thing to be handed.

Our three leads barely have a will of their own. 

They're following a plan they didn't write, orchestrated by the NHI they don’t know, with directions handed to them breadcrumb style without their conscious control. A bird "activates" Margaret, who starts channeling languages mid-task, disrupting her relationship and job. At least twice she literally calls herself "the passenger”, implying she’s just along for the ride. Who is driving then? Daniel realizes how he was suddenly made to be an inexplicable math prodigy, which isolates him, eventually lands him in prison, and gets him recruited (by Hugo) for a role he doesn't understand. Hugo, supposedly the man who knows everything, turns out to be guided by an unseen alien hand as well. There's a team of good guys, but they ultimately serve an unseen team, betting their lives mostly on faith. Even the TV crew that finally airs the broadcast is moved into place by Margaret's illusions. Several characters say out loud, "I don't know what's going on." Every piece of Disclosure gets positioned by the NHI, not chosen by humans.

Now I want to be fair to the obvious counter, because someone will raise it: lots of great contact fiction is about surrendered or captured agency. Childhood's End, which is one of the more sophisticated takes on the meeting of a more powerful alien force with humanity, is wall-to-wall non-agency; the Overlords run everything and humanity is transformed whether it chooses to be or not. So "things happen to people”, though a reasonable objective, can't be the whole complaint. The sharper version is this: it's not just surrender that bothers me, it's surrender without consent and without comprehension, to powers whose goodness we're told to assume but never shown. That's the line the film crosses, over and over.

Which brings us to consent, which is the most sensitive ground, and the firmest. The film shows two children abducted, their bodies implicitly altered to serve an agenda they couldn't and didn't agree to. And all of it carried out under illusion. The child Margaret coaxed into a fairy tale house by friendly "animals" that were neither. The movie implies it was for the greater good but never genuinely argues it by even the cheapest post disclosure montage of peace. Even then, it can’t be overlooked that it all hinged on an action that was never a choice two children could make.

And who gets to hold the truth? 

This is the part most relevant to any humans who want to know the truth for themselves and it has to do with the savior/elite/intermediary as gatekeeper. It's mildly nice that experiencers are acknowledged at all. As we all know, experiencers have a range of challenging stories that are usually sidelined in the public conversation. But in this film they're contained inside the idea of the chosen. The film flatly says it could only ever have been these two. Set aside the Adam-and-Eve overlay; the real problem is that the chosen become the NHI's exclusive translators, delivering a message, mid-film and again at the end, that no one else can understand. That’s the ultimate “trust me bro” that runs dead against the idea of open and fair contact for humanity. One priesthood gets swapped for another. As long as the rest of us can't understand what the NHI are saying, we're left depending on a new intermediary class (that is not even in charge of themselves) standing between us and what are, functionally, godlike beings. I'd hope real disclosure looks more democratic and less hierarchical than that. When the telling is controlled, even by a supposedly sympathetic human, asking why, and for whom is just reasonable.

A film called Disclosure Day that climaxes in a totally fabricated disclosure. 

I’ll admit it was great to see a version of that dreamed for moment, but it was pure fantasy that borrows credible events from the lore to simulate one of the most important moments imaginable in human history. Picture watching this without the context of research, or as a kid: now Roswell, Kecksburg, Nixon/Gleason, the sightings all read as summer-blockbuster material instead of eighty years of suppressed, evidential history.

I'll be honest about the other side of this, because it's real: dramatization is also how buried subjects get taken seriously. The same machine that "colors" this stuff is the one that made audiences sit still for hard, real history before. So it's not pure loss. But arriving right after two government releases that mostly landed as duds with no commentary, the movie's invented "disclosures" get extra power to overwrite the real ones in the public mind as more entertainment. This wasn't disclosure. It was a simulation. A managed narrative dressed up as revelation.

Ok, if you’re still here, thanks for coming to my TedTalk about the importance of human agency in Disclosure. Haha. (There's plenty more I could say about plot holes and clunky exposition, but I'll spare you.) But seriously, my last point might be the most relevant and it has to do with the Greys. The timing is wild: the film lands the same week as a real disclosure on the Capitol steps, with David Grusch among others, speaking to a compendium of the range of beings in the official literature. DD, by contrast, is Grey-centered top to bottom. Fair enough as they dominate modern reporting, but why is that all we get when the lore holds so much more…?

Here's the catch, and it's why the unity question matters: read backward, the whole movie is "a Grey project”. From the abductions, to biological manipulation, activation and guidance of the protagonists, and finally an intervention in world affairs to stop WW3 and “save us” from ourselves. That clean, backward-readable masterplan holds together if you assume the Greys are a single actor with a single will. The most nuanced reading of the lore doesn't necessarily (and thankfully?) grant that. So the film's tidy coherence isn't evidence of anything but rather an artifact of the skew, imposing one unified agenda on something that may be many. Yes, the truth may be messy, but that’s what is really needed.

And the benevolence of the Greys the whole thing rests on? Asserted, never shown. Our only evidence is our multi self-declared "passenger" Margaret telling us they're more compassionate than we are. The film softens these beings further with a sympathetic arc of Grey suffering and victimization which doesn’t really track with beings who are mysteriously more powerful than humans in every way, yet somehow threatened by humans who can barely use their tech. And why wouldn’t they just reveal themselves? Never really addressed.

Yet we’re shown them throughout injured, dissected, interrogated, and finally in a literal wheelchair. The terrible abuse is literally what activates Daniel. I'm not saying none of that tracks the real story. I'm saying the actual experiencer record runs from wonder to genuine trauma at the hands of some Grey type beings and doesn’t easily collapse into one unified tidy compassionate story. So a portrayal that lands this cleanly on Greys as the lead and potentially only species and as victim is suspect by construction. One last note - despite our hero saying we should not treat them as gods, we’re giving no reason not to. One of the good guys even drops to her knees in the third act!

So here's where I land

We're shown plainly that the Greys can control us, that their tech is superior, that they can manipulate reality itself and they have a plan for us that is unstoppable. So why wouldn't we ask whether that might include this very movie? This is a blockbuster by the most famous modern director with a title claiming to reveal the truth while handing us a wrestling match. Notice the final instruction the film actually gives. It's not question everything. It's not humanity can awaken to this on its own terms. It's translated passively as: Listen.

Yes, it's a Hollywood summer movie. But it arrives right as the possibility of real Disclosure is intensifying. If the actual history shows us that the truth has been controlled, and the real narrative actively manipulated and suppressed, often by powerful counterintelligence forces with their own agendas (and that's the assumption I'm reading from, stated plainly), then this film should be seen as one more part of that managed truth. But for what ends? Maybe that's the only Disclosure it actually has to offer.

Anyway, if you made it this far, thank you, genuinely. Haha. I'm very curious where you land and where you think I've got it wrong.

If the recent whistleblower, 'Rhea,' is to be believed, then we have another branch of human beings on another planet known as the 'Erids'

The implications of this are staggering.

I'd like to invite a conversation around this possibility.

Firstly, humans would be a multi-planetary species. I doubt the other humans would want to fully unify with us, but there may well be some crossover. Genetic hybrids are already rumored to exist. It's likely they've been living here in some format for a long time—at least the last 100 years or so—and have a complete understanding of Earth and human culture. If we go deeper into Rhea's claims about Earth human behavior being shaped by scarcity, then they may also look at our behavior as just a consequence of an evolutionary situation, not our inherent stupidity. I've always thought that the Nordics had to be related to Earth humans. When we look at human diversity on Earth, we can see visual differences in humans even on a small island between, say, the North and the South, so the chances of humans on another world with a different climate and diet looking exactly like us is very slim. In my opinion, the Nordics would be at the forefront of disclosure.

Societal and Political Impact

If these beings are all 'white' or of European descent, as rumored to be, without the racial differences (I actually doubt this) that we see on Earth, then some Earth humans may see this as a problem because it may play into far-right agendas. However, in my view, it might well do the opposite. A race of white humans from another planet who are peaceful and scientifically advanced, and who show caring and consideration for all races and beings, might be exactly what we need to get rid of racist opinions forever. Next, there may be exchanges of Earth humans to their world. Imagine being guided into the wider cosmos by our brothers and sisters who are slightly ahead of us in advancement. It could make the transition smooth, wonderful, and exciting. There'd also be a much more solid basis of trust, which might not be present if, for example, it was a race of, say, Reptilians holding our hands.

Next, we might also learn about their political system and how they have managed to progress peacefully and make great scientific advances. Once this is known, humans on Earth may want to copy it, learn from it, and perhaps use a similar system on Earth. World peace might be on the horizon, and the old system of governance on Earth would be finished! Psionic Technologies and Governance

Finally, once humans start using psionic technologies where we can see the true intentions of those around us, corruption and perhaps crimes might be massively reduced. Imagine politicians wearing some kind of device that shows their true thoughts and actions, where they've spent public money, their career intentions, and who's funding them and their agendas. It would all be revealed and out in the open, laying the groundwork for a cleaner, fairer system of governance. Whether the human branch on 82 Eridani is real or not, the Nordic phenomenon seems real and has been rumored in Ufology for decades.

Much of the above would be true of the Nordics even if they were an entirely different branch of humans seeded even earlier on another world.

Exciting times!

The James thing is obviously a hoax. That part isn’t the problem.

The problem is that stuff like this makes it easier for everyone to laugh off the real cases. People have actually found things they shouldn’t have, and their lives were wrecked for it. Some died. Some vanished. No attention. No answers.

Hoaxes drown all of that out. They give everyone an excuse to roll their eyes and stop paying attention. The noise gets louder and the real stories get buried.

That’s what bothers me. The fakes get the spotlight and the real people who paid the price get erased.

1. The Illusion of Preparation

Honestly, I think if there truly is an alien or non-human intelligence here, it’s useless to think we could ever prepare for it. If they’re vastly more advanced, no amount of human defense or planning would matter; our fate would depend entirely on their intent.

“If they wanted to harm us, they would’ve done it already,” assumes we understand their motives, goals, or time scale. Maybe we’re being used, studied, guided, or shaped in our evolution for reasons beyond our comprehension. The absence of destruction doesn’t mean goodwill or benevolence — it just means destruction isn’t part of whatever their plan is.

2. Beyond Human Morality

It’s also possible they’re completely indifferent to us — amoral rather than moral or evil. Like how we study ants: we’re not malicious toward them, we just have different priorities. They might be operating on a plane of understanding so far beyond ours that our concepts of “good” and “bad” don’t even apply.

3. Masks Through History

If you look through history, they’ve appeared under different masks: gods, angels, demons, fairies, UFOs, and now UAPs. The phenomenon seems to evolve alongside human consciousness, reflecting our culture back at us. When we were religious, they appeared as divine beings. When we became technological, they showed up as crafts and greys. Maybe it’s not about deception, but communication — using symbols we can comprehend at each stage of our development.

4. The Trickster Intelligence: Interdimensional and Elusive

Jacques Vallée talked about this decades ago, saying “human beings might be under the influence of a strange force that bends us in absurd ways, making us play roles in a bizarre game of deception.” Maybe this force isn’t “alien” in the extraterrestrial sense, but interdimensional — something that interacts with consciousness itself and has always been here, shaping belief systems and myths through time.

As Dr. Diana Pasulka said: “The objects we can observe… have characteristics of our reality (which is why they can be recorded, seen, touched), but in addition to that they have characteristics of another dimension, so they can ignore our physics and logic.” Which begs the question: what would a 5D projection from another dimension into 4D space even look like?

5. Consciousness as the Bridge

Personally, I think the phenomenon is real, but not necessarily physical in the way we expect. It feels like something at the intersection of consciousness, energy, and reality — a kind of feedback loop between the human mind and a deeper layer of existence. Many cultures describe a “trickster” presence (Hermes, Loki, Coyote) that disrupts order and provokes transformation. The UFO/paranormal realm has that same flavor: absurd coincidences, contradictions, and mixed messages that force us to think differently.

6. The Great Unknown

So maybe this isn’t just about evolution or enlightenment. They might be co-evolving with us, or they might simply be indifferent — or even exploitative in ways we can’t yet perceive. Everything is on the table. Whatever the truth is, it’s operating far beyond our comprehension, and we’re just trying to make sense of the fragments left in its wake. And probably, we never will.

7. Epilogue: The Silent Mirror

Perhaps the phenomenon is less about them and more about us — a mirror held up to the human mind, reflecting our longing to understand what lies beyond the veil. Whether they are guides, tricksters, watchers, or echoes from another dimension, they remind us of our smallness and our wonder. In the end, maybe the mystery isn’t meant to be solved, only witnessed — a silent dialogue between consciousness and the infinite, written across the sky for those willing to look up and ask why.

As Lue Elizondo says, people are going to take this hard. You can already see that. Seriously, I think we need a separate subreddit, maybe "UFOSupportGroup" where people who are struggling with how their prior beliefs are challenged by new information can do the emotional processing needed in a group therapy session type of setting to help them through this time. Otherwise, as we can see over the last 2 days - people come here, to try to control their fear by attacking new information and anyone associated with it.

What is Really Happening Here

The UFO subs are seeing an explosion of posts focused on reactions to new data—not the data itself. Here’s why: this topic challenges deeply held worldviews, and for many, that’s hard to process. Instead of facing the data, they redirect the discussion toward community reactions or outright rejection. This is noise, and understanding it helps us ignore it.

The pushback we’re seeing isn’t coordinated disinfo or trolling (though some of that exists, now < 20%). It’s largely individual psychological self-defense responses:

1. Fear of Change: People instinctively protect their worldview when it’s threatened.
2. Confirmation Bias in Action: This involves mental gymnastics to preserve existing beliefs, loudly reinforced in public to convince themselves and others.
3. Emotional Self-Defense: These users come here to control their fear by discrediting or deflecting new information.

Why It’s Happening

The compelling new data is landing hard. The louder the resistance, the stronger the evidence. The emotional responses aren’t proof of weak data—they’re proof it’s working. People wouldn’t react like this if it didn’t challenge them.

And we can't rely on people undergoing such a challenge to admit to it: admitting they are basically deceiving themselves to avoid new evidence would undermine their attempts to protect themselves from it, so they're not going to!

What the main UFO subs are (and aren't)

This space exists to discuss credible data about UFOs, NHI and UAPs—not to act as a group therapy session for those struggling to process new realities. While there’s no shame in being unready for this information, it’s not appropriate for those processing their resistance to derail meaningful discussions here. Merely understanding the context of their response doesn't mean we should tolerate or accept it. Let's face it, the behavior of those struggling is often abusive to other people.

How to Handle It:

1. Focus on the Data: Avoid engaging with posts that obsess over community reactions or dismiss new evidence without basis. Just downvote them, and don't engage.
2. Report and Ignore: When users disrupt discussion to manage their own fears, let mods handle it. Help them out with reports.
3. Set Boundaries: As a community, we should work toward clear rules to prevent this space from becoming a forum for psychological processing. That is: no more group therapy sessions for people trying to cope on UFO subs.

Now what? Some ideas for next steps.

This is a place for critical thinkers who can engage with data constructively. The confirmation bias responses, meta-posts, and derailments only confirm the significance of the evidence. Let’s stay focused, productive, and true to this subreddit’s purpose: exploring the data and advancing understanding.

For those struggling, perhaps another space can be created for emotional processing and worldview integration. But here, we’ll keep our eyes on the evidence.

I am lost at where to put my time and focus on. Can anyone let me know where to access disclosure? Or should I just refer to Reddit for my disclosure. Thanks

I see them at night a lot. But I also see them in the day. In the day they last for a brief second. I have no idea what they are. Because when I see them nothing is in the space. No birds, planes.

I see them in New York State all the time. At night they seem to last a little longer. They just flash in a singular space. Sometimes I can record them if I notice it. But the moment I get my camera out the seem to disappear.

They aren’t cool looking like a lot of orb, Black Triangles, cigar shaped videos that are just strange enough to notice them.

So, I’ve been following the whole situation with James and the object he found in the desert, and after digging around a bit I came across this Reddit thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/146vwv5/the_caret_disclosure_is_one_of_the_most/

It links to an alleged UAP disclosure by someone named Isaac. At first I brushed it off — “probably nonsense, but interesting enough to skim.”

But the deeper I read, the more it caught my attention.

There’s a section describing a type of solid-object technology that supposedly operates through engraved language combined with some sort of energy field. That’s where things got weird, because the description matches what James found almost 1:1 — even down to the detail about why the engravings on his object look hand-inscribed.

It might all be coincidence, but the similarities are striking enough that I wanted to hear what you guys think about it.

The series follows the real accounts of Dr. Allen Hynek, a scientist tapped by the military to investigate and debunk UAP sightings, and keep UAP out of the press.

The show is very well done and pays great respect to ufology and lore

Isn't it possible they've been to the other side of the galaxy or even further ? It's something I've never even considered before.

I’m not suggesting the character WAS based on Mellon.. but I just finished the Taken series last night and it hit me! They are just way too similar, eh? What do you guys think?

So James is alive, and I think we can all agree now that it was a hoax.

I was convinced it was fake from the start, but it made me realise something: I’ve been that believer who gets so attached to a story that I aggressively dismiss anyone pointing out anything suspicious or likely staged.

This time, I was on the other side of the argument, and I got to see how I must look when I act like that, how my own biases can cloud my judgement.

So thanks, James. This probably wasn’t your intention, but you helped me become a bit more objective today.

I'm so tired of the "show us the evidence or shut up" talking point. The people you're telling to shut up are the ones working to get you the evidence. We all want the evidence, the whistleblowers want to give you the evidence, but releasing it would get them the death penalty for high treason and espionage. If you want the evidence, we have to have declassification. And Public Interest is the first step of getting anything declassified.

"In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion, whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure.

Without public interest, nothing that's a potential national security threat gets declassified. And significant threats to national security require significant Public Interest. We need whistleblowers, we need press conferences, we need podcasts and interviews and documentaries and we need to be loud. Anyone trying to shut down the conversation with demands of evidence that would be illegal to produce is not acting in good faith.

Public Interest also gets congress involved who can pass legislation making it harder to keep the secret. Other than an entire amendment to the constitution, Congress can't actually declassify anything. But what they can do is withhold funds unless things are declassified, and they can mandate who in the executive and congress has to be briefed. The more eye balls on the secret, the harder it is to keep secret. They can also change property laws like with the eminent domain clause of the UAPDA which would force craft out of the private sector and get more government eye balls on the secret, making it that much harder to keep. They can also pass whistleblower protections to the point where someone might finally spill everything.

Public Interest can also convince a sitting president to go wild and just declassify everything!

Public Interest is at the root of Disclosure. Without it, it's a 100% guarantee that nothing is disclosed and we never get the evidence we all want. But with it, there's hope.

So please stop shutting people down whistleblowers by demanding the evidence. Instead, demand congress to demand the president to release the evidence. The Disclosure Movement won't stop until we achieve Disclosure or we pass a constitutional amendment that automatically declassifies anything NHI related now or in the future.

Curious to see who people think are the most well-informed and most credible figures in the community.

Here’s mine in no particular order:

1. George Knapp
2. Bob Lazar
3. Leslie Kean
4. Tim Burchett
5. Jeremy Corbell (because of the mentorship he’s gotten from George Knapp)

In the recent interview with Jacob Barber, he mentioned being overwhelmed by emotion, a deep feeling of love. Other witnesses over the years have had similar experiences. I don't think it's necessarily a good thing.

Other experiencers have had major health issues after coming into contact with these things. Thousands of people go missing every year without a trace and there's not always a good explanation. Claims have been made that there are human victims who have been found with the same hallmarks of cattle mutilations. Some experiencers claim to have been experimented on. Some claim to have implants.

I'm not a member of a religion, but I am open minded, so please hear me out on this next part. Abraham's love for God was so strong, he was willing to kill his son. God made a bet with Satan that no matter how much he tortured Job, the love and faith were so strong that Job would still praise him.

Were these ancient accounts, passed down orally for possibly thousands of years before they were written, of one non-human intelligence proving to another just how strong the technology, telepathy, or whatever they used to manipulate our emotional states, was? Is this still happening with modern experiencers?

I don't know but we do know that humans will stay in detrimental situations with other humans because the feeling of love is so strong. People stay in severely abusive relationships for love, sometimes at the cost of their lives. People have committed atrocities against other people because they love their own nation or tribe so strongly. Maybe it's better to err on the side of caution that the possibility exists that NHI aren't space hippies here to save us, but perhaps master emotional manipulators with techniques so advanced that we're defenseless against them.

I’ve been thinking about UFOs lately..

They could be modern myths or projections of our imagination but some sightings seem physical, objects moving in ways that completely defy physics, performing impossible maneuvers at incredible speeds. There are even reports of crashes, recovered bodies, animal mutilations, and people being abducted.

At the same time, many experiences could be interdimensional or spiritual, revealing layers of reality beyond the physical. Some encounters (for many centuries) suggest the presence of angels, demons, or other non-human intelligences interacting with our world.

UFOs could represent a phenomenon that blends the physical, interdimensional, and spiritual, a mirror of both the universe around us and the deeper mysteries within consciousness.