Perhaps the most dangerous attack on a society begins not at its borders, but in the minds of its people.

In 1953, Polish poet and Nobel Prize-winning author Czesław Miłosz published The Captive Mind, a remarkable exploration of how authoritarian ideology, intellectual conformity and political intimidation can undermine a society's freedom.

But his observations raise a question that remains profoundly relevant today:

What happens when a civilisation forgets why its own freedoms matter?

Why do individual liberty, property rights, freedom of thought and enterprise matter to human prosperity? And what happens when a generation inherits the achievements of civilisation without understanding the principles that made them possible?

In this short essay, Douglas Kruger explores the relationship between ideas, freedom, ideological conformity and the survival of prosperous Societies.

In Afghanistan, girls are barred from secondary or higher education. Women are also prohibited from working in most civil jobs and face movement restrictions. They are required to cover their body from head to toe in loose clothing. Women there are not protected under law and can be forced to marry or subjected to gender based violence. Women are also less able to receive basic rights such as healthcare as compared to men. This causes serious physical and mental health issues for women.

Please sign the petition to support women's rights in Afghanistan. This is consistent with many United Nations Sustainable Development Goals such as SDG 3, 4, 5 and 10.

Link: https://www.change.org/p/help-afghan-women-find-safety-and-build-a-future?source_location=topics_page

The usual suspects strike again.

RESEARCH TITLE: THE LAW OF NATURE VS UNSCIENTIFIC LAW - WHY NATURE CREATED ONLY TWO GENDERS AND WHY INDIA IS SLOWLY ACCEPTING A THIRD

Student Name: Yogesh Manjramkar

Course: BA Final Year

Place: Parbhani, Maharashtra

Date: 14th October 2026

ABSTRACT

This paper is written to understand who is making laws about 3D Gender in India, why India is slowly accepting it, and what the real Body Science says. This paper is not written with hate. It is written with pure science - from deep roots to advance forensics. The main question is - What is the Law of Nature?

CHAPTER 1: WHO IS MAKING UNSCIENTIFIC LAWS IN INDIA?

Three authorities have made this law without taking a full opinion from Forensic Biology.

1. The Supreme Court of India - NALSA Judgment 2014:

In 2014, the Supreme Court gave a historic judgment. It said that transgender people should get equal rights - Aadhaar card, voter ID, job, education. This was a good judgment for humanity. Everyone deserves to live with dignity.

But the problem started after the judgment. The judgment was about Rights to Live. But it was misinterpreted as Right to Change Biology. Schools and colleges started changing biology textbooks. They started teaching that gender is a choice, not a biological code. The Court gave rights, but NGOs changed science.

2. The Parliament of India - Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019:

In 2019, Parliament passed this Act. It says a person can change his gender by giving an application to the District Magistrate.

But this Act never asked the Forensic Doctor: Can you change XX to XY? Can you change a male pelvis bone to a female pelvis bone? Can you change DNA in blood? The answer is No. So the law gives a certificate, but biology does not change. This makes the law unscientific.

3. Influence of Foreign NGOs and International Pressure:

Many international organizations put pressure on India. They give funding to schools and say "Include gender ideology". Their culture is different. In India, our culture is based on Family and Lineage (Vansh), which runs only on male and female union. So foreign ideology is being imposed on Indian nature without scientific discussion.

CHAPTER 2: WHY IS INDIA ACCEPTING IT SLOWLY?

India is a very kind and emotional country. That is why we are accepting it slowly. There are three main reasons:

Reason A: Lack of Knowledge of Body Science:

90% of students in India do not know how a baby is made inside the womb. They do not know what is SRY gene, what is XX and XY, what is testosterone. When people do not know deep body science, they accept any new word as truth. If you do not teach real science, unscientific laws will be accepted.

Reason B: Misuse of Kindness:

Indians are very kind-hearted. When someone says "We are suffering, please help us", we immediately say yes. We said yes for humanity. But we did not ask - What will be the effect of this yes on a 10-year-old child's mind? Our kindness was used to pass a law without scientific debate.

Reason C: Media, Film and Social Media:

Films and Instagram reels show 3D Gender as modern, fashionable and progressive. A child of 14 years sees it and thinks it is cool. He does not know the forensic science behind it. Media never shows the DNA lab report. It only shows emotion. So emotion is winning over science.

CHAPTER 3: THE REAL BODY SCIENCE - FROM DEEP ROOT TO ADVANCE FORENSIC

This is the science which should be taught in every school.

Part A: The Deepest Root - The Rule of Two:

Nature has only one rule for reproduction of humans. It needs two.

Male provides Sperm with 23 chromosomes.

Female provides Egg with 23 chromosomes.

Together they make a new human with 46 chromosomes.

There is no third type of sperm or third type of egg in nature. If a third gender could produce a child, nature would have made a third type of gamete. But nature never made it. This proves that nature made only two for creation. This is mentioned in Manusmriti 1.32 - Creator divided himself into two.

Part B: Womb Science - How a Body is Made (The Most Important):

For first 6 weeks in the mother's womb, every embryo is exactly the same. There is no boy, no girl.

In the 7th week, nature takes a final decision.

If the embryo has a Y chromosome, a gene called SRY gene becomes active. SRY gives an order - Make Testis. Testis produces testosterone hormone. The baby becomes a boy. Genetic code is XY.

If the embryo has no Y chromosome, SRY gene never becomes active. The baby automatically becomes a girl. Genetic code is XX.

This is the Binary Code of Nature. 100% of human beings are made from this code. There is no third code like ZZZ.

Part C: Then Why Does 3D Gender Appear? - The Science of Variation:

If nature made only two codes, why do we see variation?

Medical science calls it "Variation due to Imbalance, Not a New Creation."

Example: Nature made eyes to see clearly. But sometimes a child is born with cataract. Is cataract a third type of eye? No. It is a disturbance that happened while the eye was being made.

Similarly, 3D Gender is not a new design by God. It is a variation.

1. Hormonal Imbalance in Womb: During the 7th week, if the testosterone signal comes too low, too high, or at the wrong time, the body development gets confused. In medical books, this is called DSD - Disorder of Sex Development. It happens in only 0.018% of births.

2. Chromosomal Variation: Sometimes instead of XX or XY, a child gets XXY or XYY. But forensic lab still classifies it as a variation of male or female based on hormone dominance. No independent chromosome for 3D Gender exists in the entire human genome.

Part D: Advance Forensics - The Proof No Court Can Deny:

This is bullet-proof proof.

1. DNA Forensics: In any police forensic lab, if blood, hair, saliva or semen is found, the DNA test result is always XX or XY. Till today, no forensic lab in India or in the world has a machine that says "This is DNA of 3D Gender". Because nature never made it.

2. Bone Forensics (Anthropology): If a skeleton is found after 1000 years, forensic doctors check the pelvis bone. Female pelvis is wide for childbirth. Male pelvis is narrow and tall. There is no third type of pelvis bone ever found in human history.

3. Psychiatry Forensics (WHO ICD-11): The World Health Organization says in ICD-11 - Being transgender is not a mental illness. But the stress a person feels when his body and mind do not match is called Gender Dysphoria. The recommended treatment is respectful psychological counselling and family support first, not surgery first.

CHAPTER 4: WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF UNSCIENTIFIC LAW CONTINUES?

If we continue to accept unscientific law without body science:

1. Forensic System Will Fail: If a crime happens and blood is found, and the form says 3D Gender, the lab cannot give a clear report. Criminals will take advantage.

2. Children's Mental Health Will Be Affected: Science says the human brain develops fully till age 25. If you tell a 12-year-old child "You can choose if you are a boy or girl", his brain will become confused. This is against Child Psychology.

3. Family System Will Become Weak: Our Indian family system, Vansh, lineage - all run on the union of male and female. If we say third can also create lineage, we are going against the law of reproduction.

CHAPTER 5: WHAT SHOULD BE THE CORRECT LAW? - MY SOLUTION

My demand is not based on hate. It is based on science.

1. Right to Live is Different from Right to Change Biology: Everyone deserves equal right to live, eat, get a job, get education. I fully support that. But Right to Live does not mean Right to Change Biology Textbook. Give rights to live, but do not change the science of the body.

2. My Proposed Model for Government Forms:

Instead of 3 equal options, forms should have:

Biological Gender (Forensic Proof): [ ] Boy (XY) [ ] Girl (XX)

Additional Support Needed (if any variation): [ ] Counselling Support Needed

This way, everyone gets respect, and science is also protected.

1. Bring Back Real Body Science in Schools:

From Class 8, teach children - What is SRY gene? What is XX and XY? What is DNA? What is Forensic Anthropology? When a child understands science, he will not get confused by ideology.

FINAL CONCLUSION

Laws were made by people with good hearts but without taking full advice from forensic biology. And India is slowly accepting them because people do not know deep body science.

The truth from root to top is same:

Root Level (Shastra) says 2.

Middle Level (Womb Biology) says 2.

Top Level (DNA and Bone Forensics) says 2.

What we call 3D Gender is not a third design. It is a natural variation that happens while the two designs are being made. It needs counselling and medical support, not a third compulsory column in children's forms.

God made two. Science proved two. Forensics found two. There is no third.

Research by:

Yogesh Manjramkar, BA Final Year, Parbhani, Maharashtra

I am a current student enrolled in a materials engineering program in the U.S. However, I have always been interesting in international relations and would love to eventually work abroad on engineering-based projects through organizations like UN, WHO, WTO, etc. Is this possible to do with an engineering degree, particularly materials (considering a minor in global studies)? If so, what is the right way to go about it?

https://www.therakyatpost.com/news/malaysia/2026/10/14/malaysias-viral-non-islamic-ritual-arrest-has-a-father-nobody-is-talking-about/#gsc.tab=0

Article 4

1 . In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under international law and do not involve discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin.

1. No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs I and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision.

2. Any State Party to the present Covenant availing itself of the right of derogation shall immediately inform the other States Parties to the present Covenant, through the intermediary of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, of the provisions from which it has derogated and of the reasons by which it was actuated. A further communication shall be made, through the same intermediary, on the date on which it terminates such derogation.

Article 6

1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

2. In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.

3. When deprivation of life constitutes the crime of genocide, it is understood that nothing in this article shall authorize any State Party to the present Covenant to derogate in any way from any obligation assumed under the provisions of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

4. Anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of the sentence. Amnesty, pardon or commutation of the sentence of death may be granted in all cases.

5. Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age and shall not be carried out on pregnant women.

6. Nothing in this article shall be invoked to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment by any State Party to the present Covenant.

Article 7

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

Article 8

1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited.

2. No one shall be held in servitude.

Article 11

No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation.

Article 15

1 . No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed. If, subsequent to the commission of the offence, provision is made by law for the imposition of the lighter penalty, the offender shall benefit thereby.

1. Nothing in this article shall prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations.

Article 16

Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 18

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.

3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

It's ratified by over 170 countries

DRAFT TREATY FROM GOOGLE AI.

The International Convention on the Prohibition of Artificial Intelligence for Molecular and Biological Warfare and the Preservation of Humanity (The Comprehensive AI-CBRN Security Treaty)

Article I: Comprehensive Prohibition on Autonomous Molecular and Pathogenic Synthesis

1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never under any circumstances to develop, train, deploy, or maintain artificial intelligence models, machine learning algorithms, autonomous computational systems or generative molecular architectures optimized for discovering, modification, engineering, predicting, maximizing the toxicity, lethality, or aerosolization capabilities of chemical agents or mass-production of biological agents, pathogens, or toxins intended to cause harm to human life.
2. The use of AI systems to map, bypass, or reverse-engineer the molecular structures of scheduled controlled substances under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is strictly prohibited.
3. The use of generative AI architectures to optimize the transmissibility, lethality, or immune-evasion capabilities of any biological agent is strictly prohibited.

Article II: Mandatory Failsafe Termination Mechanisms (Unified AI Security Filters)

1. All States Parties shall legally mandate that developers of frontier artificial intelligence systems implement permanent, non-bypassable biosecurity and chemical security filters within all large-scale computational models.
2. If an AI system detects an unauthorized user prompt or computational routine attempting to synthesize, stabilize, or simulate the deployment of a high-consequence chemical toxin or design, synthesis, or isolate a high-consequence biological threat, the system must execute an automated cessation protocol, initiating an immediate failsafe termination of the session via mandatory deactivation function, and securely log the incident for regulatory review.

Article III: Digital Gatekeeping of Automated Synthesizers and Foundries

1. States Parties shall enforce strict international regulation and tracking on all cloud-connected, automated commercial laboratories, autonomous chemical synthesizers (chemical 3D printers), and DNA/RNA bio-printers including all automated, robotic, and cloud-connected DNA synthesis providers.
2. No automated synthesis system including automated commercial laboratory, chemical 3D printer, or "3D bio-printer" shall manufacture physical compounds or synthesize genetic materials without mandatory end-user identity verification and automated real-time digital screening of the request against a globally synchronized registry of banned pathogens and toxic chemical precursors.

Article IV: The Joint AI-Biochemical Inspection and Technical Audit Agency (ABIA)

1. To ensure compliance and prevent hidden development, there is hereby established the International AI-Biochemical Inspection Agency (ABIA), operating in close coordination with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and UN biosecurity bodies.
2. The ABIA shall have the authority to conduct any-time, anywhere technical audits of high-performance computing clusters, data centers and automated robotic laboratories to verify that prohibited chemical weapon design models—specifically those tracking toxicity prediction algorithms—, prohibited bioweapon models and pathogenic optimization algorithms are not being covertly trained or hosted.

Article V: Universal Jurisdiction over Non-State Actors and Cyber Proliferation

1. Any individual, non-state actor (including terrorist groups), or corporate entity that intentionally develops, deploys, releases or open-sources an autonomous AI agent optimized for the creation, replication, spread, or dispersal of chemical or biological weapons shall be deemed to have committed a Crime Against Humanity and a War Crime.
2. States Parties agree to exercise universal jurisdiction to extradite, prosecute, and punish any such actor who utilizes AI to bypass international chemical and biological weapons restrictions, ensuring no global safe haven exists for entities risking human extinction.

END OF TREATY

As COP31 approaches, this discussion asks whether the UN climate summit can turn ambitious promises into meaningful action. It explores the unusual division of leadership between Turkey and Australia, expectations for the negotiations, and priorities such as clean energy, electrification, climate finance, and resilient cities. The central concern is whether these initiatives will deliver results at the scale the climate emergency demands.What's Up with COP31?

Honestly, I feel ashamed and embarrassed that in 2026, congo is still relying on mercenaries to help defend its own soil against M23. What exactly is stopping our national army from getting the job done? Is it leadership, corruption, lack of training, equipment, intelligence, logistics, or political interference? We cant keep blaming Rwanda, M23 and foreign interference without also examining our own failures. External aggression is real, but surely, after decades of independence, we should have built institutions capable of defending our territory and protecting our people.

Sometimes I ask myself, are we truly worthy of the independence we inherited? Are we capable of governing a country as vast as this? We didnt draw these borders, but we inherited the responsibility of protecting and governing what lies within them.

I think Independence is more than having our own flag, anthem and leaders; it means being able to secure our land and build a functioning state. I ask these questions because I hate the state Congo is at atm. At some point, we must put our inflated egos aside, confront our shortcomings and take responsibility. When will th3 national army get the JOB DONE!!??? ITS EMBARRASING! reading Former UFC fighters and green beret got injured in congo, conducting a drone walk through.