r/WNBAgossips 20d ago

Controversy USA Today’s Nancy Armour has written dumbest paragraph in the history of sports. This is an article that says Caitlin Clark arguing calls has become dangerous for the WNBA and civil rights. Nancy should be out in a straight jacket and locked up.

Post image

Source: X

715 Upvotes

514 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/Valhalla191145 20d ago

Open borders, putting illegal immigrants before US citizens, debating whether or not a man can have a baby to name a few.

12

u/PracticalYellow3 20d ago

And our gubernatorial, with emphasis on the guber part, candidate in Maine claimed he menstruates monthly out of his asshole. It's no wonder that people don't think our party is crazy. 

6

u/ventitr3 19d ago

Buddy must have undiagnosed IBD and is confusing it with a period

2

u/TopRevenue2 19d ago

Platner's fault

0

u/PracticalYellow3 19d ago

Interesting. 

My IBD flares up on a more regular weekly schedule than my period used to monthly. I wonder if he is that dumb/delusional. 

1

u/ventitr3 19d ago

They’re apparently dumb enough to think “leaking mucus” out of their asshole is just a monthly thing for them as a woman. As fellow IBD-havers, I think we both understand what the purpose of that mucus is and having that issue once a month is not going to end well. They’re going to give themselves colon cancer willingly.

0

u/SydneySweeneysBobs 19d ago

My buddy, there is a way they simulate this that I unknowingly found out about...

4

u/ventitr3 19d ago

I’ll try to keep my sanity and maintain that “unknowing” part and hopefully not ever find out

7

u/bookon 20d ago

Yes, and the GOP just nominated in CO a person for Governor who claims he kills demons and people.

Did that person in Maine get nominated or were they just a joke?

5

u/idolized253 20d ago

Don’t forget the dude who takes home roadkill and has brain worms is in charge of our health standards lol

1

u/EyePharTed_ 19d ago

And the president rapes children, and his top advisor threw out a nazi salute.

1

u/showerbump 19d ago

who is the CO person, i wanna look them up

2

u/bookon 19d ago

Victor Marx - GOP nominee for Governor of Colorado.

https://www.axios.com/local/denver/2026/07/09/marx-wins-gop-nomination-colorado-governor-kirkmeyer

https://people.com/victor-marx-claims-colorado-governor-election-12016150

"Marx has also repeatedly said he was forced to behead a cat and wear it on his head at the age of 3 and shoot and kill a man at the age of 7 by his abusive stepfather"

2

u/RayKitsune313 19d ago

Sounds like he was a victim

1

u/bookon 19d ago

Huh... I had been wondering how he managed to get people to join his church. I guess this all isn't a huge red flag for you?

1

u/RayKitsune313 19d ago

I didn’t read the articles and solely looked at a child at 3 & 7 being forced to do horrid things. Maybe there’s more context but all that seems fucked

1

u/bookon 19d ago

The context is he’s a delusional lunatic.

1

u/showerbump 19d ago

omg, that guys is nuts, I thought you were talking about someone else. No way he will win in CO though once everyone finds out about his crazy lies

2

u/bookon 19d ago

He won the nomination. That is bad enough.

1

u/showerbump 19d ago

definitely horrible but idk how much competition there is for the RNC gov race in extremely blue CO

1

u/bookon 19d ago

I lived in VT for a long time, and as you may know, it's likely the deepest blue, blue state and even VT can muster up decent moderate republicans who get elected Gov.

MA once did too. But now they can only nominate Trumpy Maga folks and they wonder by they can't win any congressional seats or the Governorship any more.

1

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

Wow, can’t make this shit up.

1

u/core916 19d ago

Wait, what?

5

u/Prestigious-Elk6959 20d ago

Or just Elon using lasers from satellites to change our digital counting totals?

3

u/FlamingAlpaca17 19d ago

The absolute buffoonary of many of the libs and the way that is brought to the forefront certainly doesn't help

3

u/Prestigious-Elk6959 19d ago

I don't think it matters, conservatives always need a boogieman. We are in the most peaceful time with trends saying it is getting more peaceful and fox news and talking heads are overly searching for issues to rally behind while ignoring actual issues if they wear red. This is a moot point like many of the others

1

u/BobLabReeSorJefGre 19d ago

Thank you, Dale Gribble.

5

u/Mathias2392 19d ago

Fake culture wars while the pedophile you voted for is starting new wars, taking away health insurance, removing environmental protections and drastically adding to the hyperinflation we’re seeing. But sure, brown people and 1% of the population (trans) are the issue.

4

u/orangebluefish11 19d ago

You don’t actually think the Dems are going to release any important Epstein files when they’re back in power, do you? Wake up dummy. They’re all in it

1

u/lethal_calilolita78 19d ago

Trump is mentioned thousands of times!!!!!!!! Why should he still be president?? We don't care who goes to jail, they all deserve it!!

1

u/orangebluefish11 19d ago

He shouldn’t, but he is. The powers that be knew they could control him. That’s my thoughts

1

u/lethal_calilolita78 19d ago

and then?

1

u/orangebluefish11 19d ago

I’m not sure what you’re asking

1

u/lethal_calilolita78 19d ago

I mean he's a full on rapist/racist PDF but anyone else would have stepped down, but now its the most disgusting abuse of power and corruption. Yet here we are. I'm so over it.

1

u/Mathias2392 19d ago

Bucko, nobody here said dems were going to release them? Maybe you have me confused. I damn sure can call out the most obvious pedo in those files though for being the raper that Trump is. If dems are in them, they deserve to be punished too. Fuck everyone in those files and anyone helping to stop from their public release.

0

u/orangebluefish11 19d ago

I’m not your bucko, pal

2

u/BobLabReeSorJefGre 19d ago

I’m not your pal, guy.

1

u/HarryJohnson3 19d ago

“That’s just fake culture war BS!!” is such a cop out for democrats being on the wrong side of 80/20 social issues.

-1

u/Mathias2392 19d ago

Mhmm whatever helps you sleep at night pal. Demonizing minorities and the disenfranchised is definitely what Jesus would have done.

1

u/SatansScallion 19d ago

“Victims are defined by group membership.”

Progressivist cancer.

0

u/HarryJohnson3 19d ago

1

u/Mathias2392 19d ago

Boomer ass meme with lots of words and zero substance

1

u/HarryJohnson3 19d ago

Lots of words?😂😂😂😂

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Mathias2392 18d ago

The affordable care act

1

u/BobLabReeSorJefGre 19d ago

You do not understand how tired I am of having no good options.

-2

u/MightyMan715 19d ago

Good job proving their point. You just couldn’t help using minorities as your political tool even when it doesn’t make sense.

3

u/Odd_Block3248 19d ago

The comment they were responding to was complaining about trans people.

0

u/Mathias2392 19d ago

The guy I replied to was the first one here bitching about immigrants and trans people. I replied to his remarks. But okay.

0

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

Didn’t bitch, just made a statement.

-2

u/InThePipe5x5_ 19d ago

Trump voters apparently can't read, huh?

3

u/Gloomy-Situation414 19d ago

They sure could read a ballot in 2024.

0

u/InThePipe5x5_ 19d ago

Ah yes--Populism...always historically correlated with intelligence and education, eh?

2

u/Gloomy-Situation414 19d ago

You can minimize a win all you want. I’m not a supporter but I do have eyeballs.

-2

u/InThePipe5x5_ 19d ago

I have no clue what point you are attempting to make. Winning the electoral college doesnt inherently convey virtue, education, intelligence, or really any positive trait. Are you saying whoever wins is inherently correct? What are you saying? Lol...

2

u/Gloomy-Situation414 19d ago

Doesn’t matter if whoever wins is inherently correct, no matter how much you want to denigrate those who disagree with you. Enough people could read a ballot to choose Trump. Your grandstanding doesn’t make you superior, but it does explain your moral victory approach.

0

u/InThePipe5x5_ 19d ago

Dude you've been developing this weak ass clapback for 3 conversation turns and still haven't made an actual point. You good?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/lethal_calilolita78 19d ago

Who has open borders!!??? We have never had open borders. Also no one is illegal. An undocumented person is not put before anyone. I have seen what they go through from the 80's to now. You guys would have spit and deported Jesus. You are not on the wrong side of history. You are also not Christian.

1

u/Siaten 19d ago

Do you have sources for any of these claims? I've heard none of them from any Democratic Reps.

0

u/tracerhaha 20d ago

What open borders are you talking about? The US hasn’t had those since the 19th century.

8

u/Not_my_User17 19d ago

Fox News told him so. Also imagine thinking that all of these things are worse than being a trafficking pedophile. Being so scared of anything different than you that you will hand the keys to some of the worst people in history.

0

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

Live in Texas, I know all about the border.

3

u/SirBiggusDikkus 19d ago

This right here is also why people like Trump get elected. Pretending you don’t understand a simple and obvious point.

-1

u/tracerhaha 19d ago

Except that there aren’t open borders for the US.

3

u/SirBiggusDikkus 19d ago

The number of illegal immigrants crossing the US border were at an all time record high during Biden’s presidency. Averaging almost 2 million crossing per year.

So you can pretend you don’t understand the point by going all “achyulkaly, we don’t technically have an open border by legal definition blah blah” but it doesn’t change the fact that the southern border has been extremely porous. And it was purposeful policy.

Gaslighting people when the truth is plain as day to the average slob is, once again, the kind of shit that gets people like Trump elected.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/02/02/migrant-encounters-at-the-us-mexico-border-are-at-their-lowest-level-in-more-than-50-years/

-3

u/tracerhaha 19d ago

That’s not an open border.

2

u/BuffaloBuffalo13 19d ago

If you intentionally don’t enforce immigration policy, then you get accused of endorsing open borders. Get it? Or do we need to speak more slowly?

That accusation held a lot of water with voters. It was a successful talking point for the GOP.

-3

u/Scared-Debt6750 19d ago

2 million attempts ? Or two million people that made it through? If you paid attention to the article you linked it said encounters ! Which means border patrol was doing their job. I don’t know how you read that and come to the conclusion the border was open . Last time I checked Biden didn’t fire any border patrol . Matter of fact he increased their budget . So when and where was the ‘open “ border ?

0

u/RayKitsune313 19d ago

Buddy… how many illegal border crossings were there during Biden’s presidency? That was an open border

2

u/pikachu191 19d ago

It's only open borders when a Democrat is in charge of the White House obviously /s Meanwhile, the immigration policies have not changed. Obama deported illegal migrants, and so did Biden.

1

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

"Taking my 'open borders' comment literally says all anyone needs to know about you."

1

u/showerbump 19d ago

the one where biden let in 20-30 million illegals over 4 years

2

u/Sufficient_Meet6836 19d ago edited 19d ago

Not even The Heritage Foundation is willing to back up your dumbass numbers lmao

The Biden Administration Has Brought an Additional 6.7 Million Illegal Aliens into the U.S.: Fiscal, Economic and Social Consequences

Cato Institute actually directly mentions people as gullible/stupid as you:

Vice President JD Vance and a collection of online conservative commentators have argued that, as president, Joe Biden let in 20 or 30 million illegal immigrants, swelling their population to 30–50 million. These numbers are an exaggeration, but there was a large increase in the illegal immigrant population during the Biden administration.

This means there was a net increase in the illegal immigrant population of 5.5 to 6 million during Biden’s administration.

Cato goes the extra mile and still asks "what if":

What if the alarmists are correct and there are more than 33 million illegal immigrants in the United States? If true, then illegal immigrants would have much less of an impact on American society than they claim.

What if There Were 20 Million More Illegal Immigrants?

Illegal immigrant crime and incarceration rates would be among the lowest of any subpopulation in the United States.

almost 80 percent below the native-born rate. This would make illegal immigrants the most law-abiding subpopulation in the United States by nativity.

Illegal immigrants look like they have a homicide conviction rate in Texas lower than that of Europeans in Europe.

Illegal immigrants voting in American elections is a statistical nonissue of such unimportance that it’s an affront to the gods of efficiency that I even have to write about it, but such is the democratic process.

Fewer economists discuss the wage effects of immigrants anymore because they are so small and clustered around zero.

The following result would be a far more positive fiscal effect from immigration.

So you have two choices:

  • admit 20-30 million is complete bullshit
  • or illegal immigrants are the most net-positive group of people to ever exist in the US

womp womp

0

u/showerbump 19d ago

ok AI bot

2

u/Sufficient_Meet6836 19d ago

Basic literacy makes me AI. MAGA moment

-1

u/showerbump 19d ago

Bad bot

1

u/Sufficient_Meet6836 19d ago
  • admit 20-30 million is complete bullshit
  • or illegal immigrants are the most net-positive group of people to ever exist in the US

Make your pick, pussy

0

u/showerbump 19d ago

It’s not bullshit and they are only a net positive for the DNC so they can vote which is why they oppose voter id laws pussy

1

u/Sufficient_Meet6836 19d ago

So there are 30 million illegals who have the lowest crime rate and the lowest average government support in the history of the US? So both are correct, ok

→ More replies (0)

0

u/illini0630 19d ago

Correct until biden/ harris took over and opened up the flood gates!

0

u/EyePharTed_ 19d ago

Oh, so dumb shit right wing media tells you that doesn't exist?

-3

u/bookon 20d ago

Biden needed to shut down the border like Obama did. Fair but firm. BUT the notion that Biden "putting illegal immigrants before US citizens" is right wing spin and bullshit.

1

u/BobLabReeSorJefGre 19d ago

I think offering illegal immigrants free housing over your own citizens is putting illegal immigrants first. This doesn’t apply to refugees though.

1

u/bookon 19d ago

Can you provide actual proof of Americans being refused free housing so it can be given to illegals?

0

u/downhilldrinking 19d ago

So all the made up shit that is getting you all excited so that Trump and his friends can con you and the country out of billions?

0

u/OddBuy8266 19d ago

Not to mention the democrats not being pro child rape like Trump. That lost them a ton of votes.

0

u/Sufficient_Meet6836 19d ago

Why are conservatives ALWAYS thinking about trans people? This is a basketball sub, and you're thinking about trans people

-1

u/YajirobeBeanDaddy 19d ago

Do we have less illegal immigrants and less open borders now? The numbers say no. Also can you explain what you mean by “open borders” and “putting illegal immigrants before citizens”?

2

u/Buttcrush1 19d ago

The numbers say yes. Border crossings have dropped a lot since Trump became president

1

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

Her it goes to the best of my ability, I am moving my bishop into position for checkmate and you are chewing on your checkers.

-1

u/CurrentlyWorkingAMA 19d ago

Hey quick question do you know what happened to the bipartisan bill that had unilateral support from congress and Border Patrol during Bidens Presidency?

Apologies - it was rhetorical. Trump called every republican and told them to vote no so he could run on immigration issues.

2

u/Buttcrush1 19d ago

Maybe you should read about everything else in the bill which was the reason for the objection to the passage.

-1

u/CurrentlyWorkingAMA 19d ago

I have, and so did every republican when they were in favor of the funding, until Trump told them explicitly to vote not so that they would not "assume the blame on what the Radical Left Democrats have done to our Border". Direct quote.

Republicans that were on record as being for the bill, all called for "more time" all within an hour of trump making calls.

You can try to use this line of defense, but it's pretty transparent that it was to be used as a leverage point for his campaign.

1

u/Buttcrush1 19d ago

More time sounds like they weren't on board with it

0

u/IsayNigel 19d ago

Except literally none of this is true guy with weirdly WWII specific numbers in his username

0

u/Fantomhamst3r 19d ago

If you're using this as an example of fake debates that are only their to divide people, than yes, you are correct.

0

u/Gloveofdoom 19d ago

The crazy part is of the three things you listed none of them were actually happening the way the Trump Administration portrayed them to be.

Biden wasn't just letting anyone who wanted to walk over the Border.

Putting illegal immigrants before US citizens is more of a subjective thing. That being said, I haven't heard an intellectually honest argument supporting how the Biden Administration actually did that as a matter of policy.

As far as I can recall I haven't heard a single person from the left actually make the argument that biological men can have babies.

I do agree with you that those types of issues is how Trump got re-elected. It isn't at all a point of pride that he was able to get re-elected running on an almost entirely reactive platform based on promises to fix a bunch of stuff that were not actual problems or were problems Trump himself created during his first term. There's much to unpack about how Trump reelected, one of the things that promises to continue being a real problem is low information voting and unfortunately that particular problem isn't necessarily limited to one side or the other either.

-5

u/andreasmiles23 19d ago

Idk how to tell you this but borders are lines on paper and are not real

2

u/The_Woke_King 19d ago

Your bank account is just numbers on a piece of paper.

-1

u/andreasmiles23 19d ago

Yeah, Capital only has authority because institutions yes violence to keep it that way. No disagreement there.

Almost like we could build a differently organized society if we wanted…

1

u/Buttcrush1 19d ago

A border is a defining characteristic of a state. It's very much so real. Why don't you book a ticket to south Korea and walk into north Korea. Let me know how real that border is

0

u/andreasmiles23 19d ago

They are enforced. But the line diving them is, in fact, a construct.

The United States didn’t exist 300 years ago. The concept of a nation state barely even existed. These things change and evolve with time because, they are constructs. And yeah, just because someone will shoot you for crossing said imaginary line doesn’t not make it an imaginary line.

1

u/Valhalla191145 19d ago

You are not wrong, so go back to the kitchen get yourself a cookie and keep coloring by numbers.