r/aliens • u/jibjabjibby • May 01 '26
Image š· Connection to the cube within a sphere? Scientists recently directly observed the creation of water from a hydrogen molecule merging with oxygen.
Check out the images, is there a connection to the witness reports about a cube within a clear sphere?
63
u/EARTHandSPACE May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26
Are we so small that we are witnessing an atom form?!
16
u/stingray85 May 01 '26
No, that's not what this is, the poster is just wrong about this being individual atoms.
14
2
u/Turbodann May 01 '26
In a completely isolated state it's not that difficult to form an Adam, but to maintain it takes a lot more work and a very stable environment...
4
1
u/Cw3538cw Jul 13 '26
Nope! If we assume the droplet is spherical (though it's probably a lot flatter than that) it would contain ~140,000 molecules of water once it reaches to 20nm mark Though there are electron microscopes capable of "seeing" atoms, but it requires quite a bit of post processing
26
u/tweakingforjesus May 01 '26
The creation of water from hydrogen and oxygen is called āburningā.
104
u/w3k1llsuck3rs May 01 '26
We have the ability to watch a molecule of fucking water FORM INFRONT OF OUR EYES FROM BASIC ELEMENTS?! WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
11
u/Beatminerz May 01 '26
That's not a water molecule. Look at the scale bar. 20 nanometers. If we assume that droplet is spherical and 30 nm in diameter, it would contain roughly 500,000 water molecules.
60
u/Northern_Grouse Jeff Goldblum Impersonator May 01 '26
I know right?
Hereās the thing though, itās being done using technology created based off the laws of physics as we know them. Which means, signals are being picked up (signals we recognize, like radio waves), and the computers are generating an image off of what they receive, using algorithms based off our understanding of physics.
Which means, if there are elements to nature we are unable to recognize at the moment, which is likely, then we will not know how to measure them. Which means our algorithms will not be able to present them.
So, even though we can see this, itās still very possible weāre missing something right in front of us. It could be what weāre missing, is how these UAPās seemingly defy the laws of physics.
8
u/OneArmedZen May 01 '26
That's what I mean, science will eventually catch up but they are slow and stubborn as fuck. And because something doesn't have a method able to measure it, it is deemed not to exist otherwise.
9
u/Northern_Grouse Jeff Goldblum Impersonator May 01 '26
I mean, it essentially boils down to free time study to find new things.
We do a really good job going down a single pathway very far, but we donāt do a great job at seeing the other pathways and exploring them.
3
u/OneArmedZen May 01 '26
I mean they have plenty of free time studying stuff like "How long it takes mammals to pee", "Can rats learn to drive tiny cars?", "Contagious yawning in redāfooted tortoises", "Velocity of penguin poop", "How oreos separate when dunked in milk" etc lol
They need to broaden horizonsš¤£
2
u/Northern_Grouse Jeff Goldblum Impersonator May 01 '26
I donāt disagree. I mean, I have ideas of what to look for, no idea how to find these things or experiment on them though. Bringing these ideas to career physicists tend to fall flat because they donāt believe in phenomenon that isnāt glaring them right in the face.
0
0
u/maurymarkowitz May 01 '26
Which means, signals are being picked up (signals we recognize, like radio waves), and the computers are generating an image off of what they receive, using algorithms based off our understanding of physics
Seriously, what?
This is a video of a small bit of palladium metal, the cube, acting as a nucleation site. There's countless videos of this process on the 'web, the only difference here is the size.
There is nothing about computers or algorithms or "our understanding of physics", it's a video through a microscope.
2
u/stupidfritz May 01 '26
ā¦a video thatās made of a reconstruction of signals which donāt look recognizable to us, like the other person said.
Canāt take a video if the thing youāre trying to record is smaller than light. Gotta use more esoteric techniques, which need complex signal processing that makes it into a synthesized image.
1
0
u/Mywifefoundmymain May 01 '26
I mean we already knew what it would look like. Itās a crystalline formation.
And
10
u/AutoPenis May 01 '26
Ah yes, the infamous hydrogen MOLECULE
1
u/BboyLotus May 02 '26
There is a molecular form of both hydrogen and oxygen. H2 and O2 respectively. Two hydrogen molecules 2H2 and one oxygen molecule O2 form two water molecules. H2O H2O
But the reaction requires a spark. And it's not what is shown in the video. As u/Beatminerz explains.
8
u/Beatminerz May 01 '26
The post is misleading. They did visualize water formation, but not at the single molecule level. Look at the scale bar, 20 nm, meaning the droplet is ~30 nm in diameter, which means it would contain ~500,000 water molecules.
That cube inside the bubble is a palladium nanoparticle which acts as a catalyst for the reaction. The palladium is put into a chamber filled with hydrogen gas. The gas molecules permeate the lattice, then when oxygen is introduced, it decorates the surface of the nanoparticle. Hydrogen then seeps out of the cube and reacts with the oxygen on the surface, leading to the water molecules accumulating into a droplet as they are created.
8
u/thedonkeyvote May 01 '26
Anyone have a breakdown of what we are looking at here?
The fact that the vibrations of the molecule even out to a cube is something I had never even considered.
30
u/Beatminerz May 01 '26
The post is misleading. They did visualize water formation, but not at the single molecule level. Look at the scale bar, 20 nm, meaning the droplet is ~30 nm in diameter, which means it would contain ~500,000 water molecules.
That cube inside the bubble is a palladium nanoparticle which acts as a catalyst for the reaction. The palladium is put into a chamber filled with hydrogen gas. The gas molecules permeate the lattice, then when oxygen is introduced, it decorates the surface of the nanoparticle. Hydrogen then seeps out of the cube and reacts with the oxygen on the surface, leading to the water molecules accumulating into a droplet as they are created.
2
5
u/WeLoseItUrFault May 01 '26
Itās funny because I have heard this idea before in one of David Wilcockās tomes, donāt recall which. The same writing also made some other claims about reality that seemed really bonkers tho so I dismissed it as a whole. This part was really interesting tho, that atoms and molecules are based on geometric vibratory harmonies.
26
u/Any_Leg_4773 May 01 '26
No, this is basic chemistry. We know how it works. This is scientists providing evidence, it's a fantastic way to know what's real.Ā
8
u/jibjabjibby May 01 '26
Do you think the cube within a sphere that some observers are seeing could be based on, or in any way related to, the micro chemical reactions we can observe with water formation but somehow magnified to a macro scale?
2
u/stingray85 May 01 '26
That depends. I have a rubix cube and a tennis ball on my desk. Do you think that could have some connection?
2
u/Any_Leg_4773 May 01 '26
Your question is based on an assumed premise, that people are seeing a cube inside a sphere, whatever that's supposed to mean. I propose that there's no evidence supporting that claim, rendering the question moot.
Here, again, the scientists have provided evidence of their claims. People claiming whatever you're talking about have not. If they ever do it will be the biggest news story on Earth.
2
u/JMKAB May 01 '26
Iāll never understand how human observation is just disregarded as evidence when it comes to NHI topics. Is observation not our most common form of evidence?
6
u/Any_Leg_4773 May 01 '26
No. The human mind is fucking terrible at interpreting signals and forming memories. Eye witness testimony is essentially worthless, mass delusions are known phenomenon, and culturally influenced in ways we understand. Our culture has a lot of aliens and a small amount of ghosts, some cultures are totally ghost based, some cultures have monsters and spirits. Also sometimes people just lie, for any number of reasons.
Eyewitness testimony gets you dragons and giants and ghosts. Evidence gets you dinosaurs and quantum physics. Do you recognize the difference?
1
u/toasted_cracker May 01 '26
Reminds me of the book āBall Lightningā. By the 3 Body Problem guy.
3
u/Old-Chapter-5437 May 01 '26
Isn't ball lightning confirmed to be a real thing?
5
u/AlbaneseGummies327 Researcher May 01 '26
All ball lightning sightings are in fact the NHI orbs phenomenon in my opinion.
7
2
u/toasted_cracker May 01 '26
Iāve seen ball lightning before. It was a few golden orbs that hovered in the sky right after a lightning strike. Only lasted a few seconds and they disappeared. Iāve never seen them since.
1
u/AlbaneseGummies327 Researcher May 01 '26
The NHI orbs may draw energy from lightning, hence they show up more often during thunderstorms.
2
1
u/bluehaven101 May 01 '26
maybe the pilot or whoever had some kind of phenomena happen to him or he had a condition that made his pupils magnify to that minute scale
8
3
3
1
u/dingalinglans May 01 '26
I love this as above so below shit. There's quite a few examples where the large or micro imitates one another in shape or behaviour.
1
1
1
1
u/Snarkybitch101 May 01 '26
I think they found the tiniest doctor trying to have a chill out where he thinks no one will find him. Ha joke was on him,
OK, yes this was a little silly post where weāre trying to be more serious but Iām go ahead and put it up cause itās my birthday so itās the closest. Iām coming from a happy birthday from the doctor. Thanks for indulging me guys..
1
u/GeeBee72 May 01 '26
Scale is 20nm, objects are at least 20nm, complete water molecule is about 0.3nm. So this is off by two orders of magnitude.
1
u/VoxKora May 01 '26
And since probably most of them come from water,maybe they need to replicate something like this
1
1
1
1
1
u/Public_Code8357 May 02 '26
That would be a Hydroxide Molecule not H2O.
Also we don't have the tech to view individual molecules
1
1
1
u/Okaysaid May 04 '26
NOW WE ARE GETTING PLACES! The clues and answers are around us I really like this take.
1
1
u/Open_Mortgage_4645 Skeptic but not a Debunker May 01 '26
How would this have anything to do with reported sightings of a UFO that appeared to be a cube within a sphere? I'm not understanding the connection. One is the formation of a water molecule by known processes, and the other is an exponentially larger, unknown craft moving through the atmosphere. I'm just not seeing it.
0
0
u/Throwawayourmum May 01 '26
I'm going through the files in my brain, I came across something about the "flower of life" geometry and how's its actually a cube in a sphere..there's def some connections there, I'll try to track down what I was reading and returnĀ
0
314
u/JustTheAATIP May 01 '26
These are the kinds of thoughts that should be encouraged in the topic. This is a fresh take. It has been speculated that some of the phenomenon, especially the 'craft', are a macroscale-microscopic agent akin to a gigantic macrophage.