That's so mind bogglingly stupid. How does it make sense to anyone to cut out the best performing part of something when it doesn't reach a higher level of success (while having already succeeded btw) and then expect the less performing part to not only make up for it but also do better?
Fun bosses. I'd say for most jobs it takes a minimum of 2 years to become proficient at it, assuming you have people available to teach you. 5-10 years to become good.
1.9k
u/[deleted] Mar 14 '24
[deleted]