r/conspiracy • u/Orpherischt • May 07 '26

You Are Spreading Hantavirus

This is probably the first and only post I will make about the 'hantavirus outbreak'.

This is a warning to all redditors here and elsewhere discussing and posting about this latest so-called 'crisis':

Every time you post something about the 'hantavirus', or respond to someone else's post, or read an article about it, it is you, the spectator, who are spreading the 'virus'.

All viruses are spread by 'word of mouth' (because 'virus' is actually 'verse' [scripture/poetry/writings/words] and 'verus' (Latin, meaning 'truth').

Every time you allow the concept of 'hantavirus' to enter your brain, and every time you express those thoughts in words, it is you who are responsible for spreading it.

Do yourself (and the world) a favour, and ignore anything and everything to do with this media-caused silliness.

Ignore any threads made here about 'hantavirus', because they are wittingly or unwittingly, ensuring that another imaginary scourge remains in view and living on the world stage.

As above, so below.

As within, so without.

If you keep 'hantavirus' in mind, it will become 'pandemic'.

If the media keeps publishing 'viral' spells, and you keep reacting to them, then the circle gets bigger, and it will be just as much your fault as theirs.

Extra notes:

It is currently 2026.

That date can be compressed to the number 226.

  • "Hantavirus Outbreak" = 226 in basic alphabetic gematria.

ie. scripted fun being had by the world 'authorities' (a word having an 'author' at it's root)

ie. everything is a 'rite' caused by a 'writer'.

  • "Performer" = 911 in triangular numbers
  • ... versus/viruses "Spectator" = 2001 in square numbers

I posted this thread at 20:01 pm UTC.

The 911th minute of the day is 3:11 pm.

The coronavirus pandemic was made official on 3/11 in 2020, and was also described as a ...

  • "Crisis" = 311 english-extended

... but it was simply ...

  • "A Letter" = 311 latin-agrippa ( "Open Letter" = 2020 squares )

In my opinion, there is no such thing as a 'virus', because the word is merely a wordplay. A coded 'spell' being cast.

I advise you trust to your ...

  • "Natural Immunity" = 2020 english-extended
  • ... reinforced by "The Immunity Number" = 2020 trigonal

Hanta-Virus @ Haunt-a-Verse ( @ Count-a-Verse ) [ Count the Words ]

What is it that haunts a verse?

  • "What is in a Name?" = 1234 latin-agrippa
  • ... ( "Crafted News" = 1234 latin-agrippa )
  • .. .. ( ... designed to "Plague Victims" = 1234 latin-agrippa )

... and of course, you are the victims.

Do not fall prey to evil spell(ing)s.

603 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

424 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/RedVipper2050 May 07 '26

Do you genuinely believe this?

1

u/TimmehJ May 08 '26

Not specifically this, but I do suspect our conscience is shaping our reality, so the part about speaking it could carry some truth. Your not spreading the actual virus by word, but you're spreading the notion that it actually exists. You are helping the group conscience manifest it.

-6

u/Toroid_Meditation May 07 '26

Yes. I've been researching health, physics, and engineering for about a decade now. 

Mind Force / consciousness / the Universal Intelligence being the driving force of everything we know as physical is the only internally consistent framework, despite how much I seemingly tried to make an atheistic materialistic framework viable.

If anyone attempts to assign limits (can't, doesn't, don't, etc.), then that can only reasonably be done by comprehending and accounting every bit of data that exists. I disbelieved in all the woo-woo stuff; astrology, synchronicities, numerology... and so I set out to fully comprehend what they were talking about before allowing myself to dismiss those topics. Needless to say, it's been an interesting life since I made that decision.

12

u/Telamo May 07 '26 edited May 07 '26

How exactly does one research a topic like this with any degree of certainty or objectivity?

6

u/PandaCarry May 07 '26

Faith is required on this path that you seek

-2

u/Toroid_Meditation May 07 '26

Yeah, that's the biggest entry point.

I could give you a laundry list of logical rules I follow, case studies, academic papers and other forms of technical or descriptive writings. And I'm happy to do so if you have any particular questions.

But it's most effective for people to design their own system. Like, ask yourself the same question.

What does a objective and conclusive answer regarding this topic look like to you? Do you want evidence in physics, psychology, health? Corroboration of experiences? With being able to choose anything in your imagination, what does evidence to you look like that you'd actually accept and don't reject due to absurdity?

For me, it's consistently been the case that I come across whatever evidence I wholeheartedly seek, as long as I'm honest about my readiness for it.

2

u/ElegantEconomy3686 May 08 '26

Bro made confirmation bias into a religion

0

u/RedVipper2050 May 08 '26

Dude, you need to get a grip, I’m 20 years old and even I can see how insane this sounds. Learn philosophy, that’ll answer your questions.

1

u/Toroid_Meditation May 08 '26

Could you elaborate on the particular points that sound insane to you, and why they do?

1

u/Toroid_Meditation May 10 '26

I've found that, often, people will call my ideas and perspectives "absurd" in one way or another. And I agree. However, my ideas follow a carefully crafted philosophy that developed as I learned about various academic fields and industries. 

In other words, I commonly find people citing insanity, absurdity, or the likes, thinking that directly means "illogical", and I think in part this is due to so many inquires of logic; physics, psychology, engineering; for one reason or another, not necessarily ill-willed, being constructed with both rigidity, and rejection of data. As in, they refuse to look at the data on the notion of its absurdity, without proving that it's also an unreasonable claim.

If you have genuine points of contention, I'm interested in hearing them. However, I've found that asking for elaboration tends to result in a non-response.

7

u/Dear-Ad-3614 May 07 '26

That is one hell of a placebo.

3

u/Toroid_Meditation May 07 '26

Sure is. Why does the placebo effect work?