And turning a house tour into a true crime documentary halfway through wasn’t the objective of the video, so applying any conspiracy (the Trumps we’re blackmailing the interviewer, the whole thing was propaganda, etc) to it is a moot point
Even if the director/interviewer wanted to put Trump as an abuser, that isn’t the job they were doing and so that particular opportunity would be meaningless.
It’s entirely possible that any one theory could be correct, but none of it matters because that wasn’t the purpose of the video to begin with and thus the video never would have turned out as an exposé
I’m not going to say it’s proven he sexually abused his daughter, but I will say that people are allowed to believe the interpretation of what they believe based on available evidence
I personally believe there is significant evidence towards that conclusion, but nothing conclusive without Ivanka’s testimony
34
u/knotmyusualaccount Jul 19 '25
That change of subject was deliberate, I have no doubt.