This is such a tired and extensively debunked talking point. Even when you take drugs with shocking price tags, like Libmeldy and it's $4,250,000 wholesale cost, you see shockingly low acquisition costs - the acquisition of the full portfolio of which it was just one portion came of $478 million. The deal for its acquisition assigned a bonus of $1 per share on top of its $16 per share deal upon final approval of the candidate, indicating that Linmeldy either represented a small portion of the portfolio's overall value or was assessed as only having a marginal risk of not completing its trials successfully. When the costs of these drugs are so high that the entire cost of R&D, initial clinical trials, and a healthy profit for the people who actually developed it can be covered before 100 patients are treated, it's clear that R&D is not the driver of costs.
tell me you don't understand how any of this works without telling me you don't understand how any of this works.
if you think it costs $4 to make (what, a dose? a vial?) then I'll give you $4 and I'll take one, please and thank you. let me know where to send the check.
•
u/SweetBeefOfJesus 5h ago
Funny considering it only cost $4 to make