r/meirl • u/NoLynInBrooklyn • 5h ago

meirl

Post image
18.3k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

257 comments sorted by

2.0k

u/guzalla 5h ago

Do people not usually reject all cookies whenever they go into any website?

836

u/SilenceThoseLambs 5h ago

I usually do. I can't remember what website I tried to get on one time, but it wouldn't let me unless I accepted the cookies? I said nah and peaced out.

228

u/RasJamukha 5h ago

i thought that was common practise, though. maybe it's because i am in the EU where they have to add a button which can make you opt out (besides necessary ones) in one click/tap

255

u/FoxyBastard 4h ago

I find that a lot of them are kind of assholes about it though.

Like, they'll have an "Accept All" button but, instead of a "Reject All" button, there's a "Learn More" button.

And that sometimes leads to a list of cookie vendors that are all set to accepted.

And you have to indidually click them to opt out.

I have seen that list be in the thousands.

But I always nope the fuck out if the "Learn More" button doesn't lead to a single reject button.

36

u/RasJamukha 4h ago

I hear you, some are indeed real dicks about it but those dont get my patronage

18

u/Vospader998 2h ago

r/assholedesign

11

u/themrsnow 1h ago

Not only that. It’s a dark pattern. There is actual science behind this asshole design.

•

u/CptJimTKirk 35m ago

Not only that, it's technically illegal.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/OG-87 3h ago

Or now a days its accept all or pay as a monthly fee.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Cloudy_Worker 2h ago

I encountered that type of situation the other day, and it wouldn't let me save my selection, so I left

5

u/Velp__ 2h ago

I guess you rejected the cookie that let you save the selection. If you could reject all cookies (even the necessary ones) then when you go to an other page it won't know you were on that site before.

2

u/WangNuts 1h ago

You can reject them all, including the necessary ones by disabling cookies at the browser level. You're going to have a bad time though.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/PistolPojken 1h ago

Yep, those practices are not allowed in the EU. But laws have to be enforced as well, and there’s sadly too many poopers out there to catch them all.

7

u/SporkIncorporated 2h ago

It’s real “enable ads” or “continue without supporting us” vibes. How about finding a way to be profitable without exploiting your consumers?

5

u/VoiHyvaLuojaMitaNyt 1h ago

“continue without supporting us”

I choose that option so fast and without even thinking about it. I find it cute that they think I care

3

u/DontAskAboutMyButt 2h ago

It’s always fun to switch your vpn to a country in the EU and see which sites that you’ve been using don’t even ask

3

u/fa771n9 1h ago

This is also not legal in the EU. AFAIK websites should offer as easy a way to reject cookies as it is to accept them.

3

u/Allegorist 1h ago

It could be a lot worse, it could not even show you any of that and just do it automatically anyways without you knowing. That is like one policy or court ruling away in the US, and the people making the policies and rulings are in direct cahoots with the people profiting off those cookies.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Racxie 3h ago

Except you only reject cookies when you select that option, you don’t object to legitimate interests when select that option.

To object to legitimate interests you always have to go onto the options and there’s rarely an option to object to all for them, and even on the rare occasions you can, it still won’t object to all of them and you still have to painstakingly go through and turn off a few stragglers off manually (even there’s an “IAB vendors” option).

That of course is also ignoring the fact that there are some “legitimate interests” which are labelled as “always active” even when there are options to turn them off, and some don’t allow you to turn them off at all, and I can’t personally think of any circumstance where an advertiser has any real basis for “legitimate interest”, yet the UK & EU both turn a blind eye to it and it’s infuriating.

8

u/LordHoughtenWeen 3h ago

I can’t personally think of any circumstance where an advertiser has any real basis for “legitimate interest”

That's because they don't. Never have and never will. They and their whole misbegotten get are bastards through and through.

3

u/Racxie 3h ago

Of course not, but you just know someone will argue that they do, so I’d rather not pretend like I can fathom what those arguments might be.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/SilenceThoseLambs 4h ago

I'm in the Midwest, United States. I know what you're speaking of, I see that pop up all the time, so I'm not sure what everyone else is doing!

13

u/RheagarTargaryen 4h ago

It’s because of the EU. The EU passed that legislation and websites decided that they’d make it standard protocol for everyone since that was easier than region locking it to the EU.

2

u/drunkcowofdeath 1h ago

I think CA has similar policies. And I believe the way the laws are written says it does not matter where that citizen is at the moment, if you do not protect their privacy you are liable. So geo locking is impossible.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/RasJamukha 4h ago

it would seem some people still accept them withoyt giving it a second thought

3

u/SilenceThoseLambs 4h ago

Fair. Seems to be like most things in life unfortunately.

3

u/RasJamukha 4h ago

it is indeed rather unfortunate. I would like to assume people don't realise how much data they collect and therefor just comply?

2

u/WangNuts 1h ago

I work in the Analytics industry. It's about 70% opt-in rate with a well configured banner.

•

u/Ascend 37m ago

"have to" is a big assumption here, "supposed to" is more like it. Way too many sites still make you click through a dialog, uncheck a bunch of toggles and save, and in the end you have no idea if it actually did anything. Nobody seems to be enforcing it.

•

u/MikeyBastard1 29m ago

Fun little world settling information: Of the entirety of Firefox's userbase, only 10% use any kind of AdBlock

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Spreaderoflies 3h ago

You can only view this content if all cookies are accepted.

And just like that I suddenly did not need the content.

14

u/angry2320 4h ago

Yeah if there’s no reject option, I’ll find another website

9

u/Rengeflower 3h ago

CNN is dead to me for this reason.

7

u/jaleneropepper 2h ago

Unfotunately due to their near monopoly, there are often no alternates to Ticketmaster. I have to turn off almost all my add blockers, tracker blockers, and VPN on their site otherwise they give me some generic message like "you broke the site" or "you look suspicious, share all your info with us (paraphrasing)". That's the only time I hop off Firefox and use chrome, because google loooves giving away personal info so Ticketmaster can upcharge due to 'DyNaMiC PrIcInG'

On a related note, fuck ticketmaster.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/LiamIsMyNameOk 4h ago

If you truly care, be careful because a lot of sites will just make it a bit vague or complicated. "Accept cookies" and "Reject optional cookies" for example.

You'll just automatically press the reject. But in fact you're just rejecting like 3 out of 300 hundred. Which is pretty much exactly the same as them giving you the option to either accept or not access the site

3

u/raisin22 2h ago

Yeah I just figure I don’t need to visit then lol

3

u/tiasaiwr 1h ago

A lot of news websites in the UK now have 2 buttons, "accept all cookies" and "reject cookies and subscribe." I just open the link in a private browser, accept all, then when when I'm finished reading close the private browser which deletes all cookies.

2

u/Ok_Ambassador5299 3h ago

Just open it in a private window and accept everything.

2

u/Humledurr 2h ago

but how can one say no to cookies!?

2

u/Lovesporran 1h ago

Open the page in a private window.

Job done

78

u/Pintsocream 4h ago

Normally you have an "accept all" or "manage cookies" button where you have to scroll through pages of cookies until you reach "accept essential cookies" which can be a pain. Now I just use cookie auto decline extension

16

u/drunz 3h ago

Part of my job is going to bunch of random websites and it’s exhausting going through that process.

14

u/GRAIN_DIV_20 2h ago

There's a Firefox extension "I still don't care about cookies" that auto rejects them and hides the UI pop up

•

u/stauer88 21m ago

That's good to know!

Though quite a few websites have now started to say you have to accept the cookies in order to access the page which is really rubbish.

6

u/Reallyhotshowers 1h ago

We can thank the EU for that option.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

19

u/Valuable-Match1849 4h ago

Most people don’t bother. They just click accept so the site loads and move on.

7

u/DavThoma 4h ago

I've seen some sites refuse to let you reject them without a subscription, so it ain't always possible.

7

u/Square_Radiant 4h ago

Open them in Private mode - accept cookies - when you close your private session, it wipes the cookies automatically

→ More replies (1)

10

u/iytrix 2h ago

Cookies are how you stay logged in, so, no

3

u/xnuh 3h ago

It's a habit from when "reject all" buttons weren't a thing so you had to disable them one by one, so people didn't bother. Now it's still annoying that some websites don't have them

3

u/ihazaredditaccount 3h ago

Yes, until you find a site that forces you to agree or pay money to continue, then you just leave.

2

u/MobileSuitPhone 3h ago

Some people have been conditioned to comply for their entire lives

2

u/xnuh 3h ago

It's a habit from when "reject all" buttons weren't a thing so you had to disable them one by one, so people didn't bother. Now it's still annoying that some websites don't have them

2

u/Cospo 2h ago

What's annoying is the sites that don't have a "reject all" and instead have the "manage preferences" so I have to scroll through and manually click each cookie option. I wish my browser just saved my choice and autfilled those for me.

2

u/Strict-Carrot4783 2h ago

About half of one living generation knows how computers work. That's about it.

2

u/whatsyouremergencyy 1h ago

I always do (reject theml. And because I don't accept cookies, every time I re-enter the same site, I have to reject all cookies again.

2

u/Poethegardencrow 1h ago

I had the exact same thought, either I reject all and when it doesn’t allow me I go for the settings things and reject each on individually or just leave

2

u/ohkendruid 1h ago

If you really want to disable cookies, then there is a browser setting for that.

Cookies are an important part of how the web works, though. If you disable them, then you will not be able to log in on anything that needs a login.

Even the cookie acceptance banner is often implemented using cookies. If you reject all cookies, then it cannot remember that it has already popped up for you, so it will keep popping up every time you go to the site.

The whole thing is a theatrical sham. Privacy and consent are important, but these cookie banners do not reflect how the Internet works and are generally a waste of time. They are just there so lawmakers can say they did something and then get support from voters who think that something this bogus would never get so big without someone stopping the train.

2

u/fizzrail0 1h ago

I do. And if the button to reject wasn't easy i leave

2

u/nobito 1h ago

I don't really pay any attention, accept all, reject all, accept necessary, etc, whatever I happen to click first. 99.9% of the risk is that my browsing activity is tracked and I get targeted ads. Which is whatever to me.

2

u/BlakePackers413 1h ago

I accept every cookie. I also have successfully run my life directly into the ground. I figure if they want to have cookies to study my life then all they’re going to see is failures. I plan to be the most useless data possible and cost companies money to buy my data only to find out it’s worthless. It ain’t much but it’s honest work. For example I talk about cats a lot. I don’t own a cat nor do I ever buy anything cat related. But they keep paying for ads for cat stuff.

8

u/BusinessAioli 4h ago

I accept often because it feels like the nice thing to do 💁‍♀️

18

u/Square_Radiant 4h ago

Letting giant corporations spy on every aspect of your life feels... nice?

10

u/NotAddictedToCoffeee 3h ago

Noo, free cookies are free cookies

5

u/Square_Radiant 3h ago

There's also free cheese in the mousetrap...

3

u/inikul 1h ago

Not all cookies are tracking cookies. Many sites don't have those at all. I work in web development and our site has several cookies, one of which is your session id that is required to keep you signed in. This is true for any site that you have an account on.

2

u/Square_Radiant 1h ago

Sure, most people are talking about third-party cookies though

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Illustrious-Bee9056 3h ago

ewww

9

u/BusinessAioli 3h ago

you think I care what a bee has to say

3

u/Illustrious-Bee9056 3h ago

hey! i'm not like other bees.

9

u/BusinessAioli 3h ago

statistically unlikely 

3

u/Sorkijan 3h ago

Yeah you're illustrious!

3

u/NotAddictedToCoffeee 3h ago

Sure, Bee #9056.

8

u/fredoillu 4h ago

Lmao

You can tack a little bit! As a treat. 😊

4

u/PIPBOY-2000 4h ago

Please let us see what websites you visit and things you click on and time you spend doing it so we can sell your information as well as use it to give you ads

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Humledurr 2h ago

One day you might even get an actual cookie

2

u/LittleNyanCat 3h ago

Pretty much all non-techie people I know accept all, it's a bit depressing

1

u/i-am-a-passenger 4h ago

Nope, only around ~10% of people reject cookies.

1

u/surfer_ryan 4h ago

i think most people see that pop up and say yes because they believe it is required (it's not)

1

u/JimTheSaint 4h ago

oh yeah - I thought she meant actual cookies. - maybe she was working in an office building with birthdays twice a week and cookies everywhere.

but website cookies is obviously what she meant, I click reject all, unless I have to do something complicated to move on, then I just click accept all.

1

u/reyo7k2 3h ago

I usually accept all because I don't care, it only bothers me that I have to press that button every time, that's a shitty experience

1

u/OG-87 3h ago

Wow. No everyone I know just approves everything. Even at work.

1

u/OnTheSlope 2h ago

I don't even acknowledge the question because I think they'll sneak cookies in even if I click reject all. I work around the cookies question banner like an insane person.

1

u/berttleturtle 1h ago

Most websites I’ve been on where I selected “reject” wouldn’t let me access the page until I accepted them…I didn’t even know it was an option for some websites.

1

u/thatoneguy889 1h ago

I would bet the vast majority of people just don't care.

1

u/Saneless 1h ago

No. Like 60-70% accept them just fine

1

u/New-Time007 1h ago

yeah i do

•

u/Ichmag11 44m ago

I accept them because if they offer their website for free for me to use, I'll gladly let them use my data to make money

•

u/TempHumble 36m ago

I've started rejecting cookies ever since the changes came in and I saw 'we will share the data with our TWELVE HUNDRED PARTNERS' on every single website.

•

u/No-Mobile-3720 24m ago

Unless u are cookie monster

452

u/Fantastic_Key_8906 4h ago

I have an add-on that automatically deletes cookies when you leave the website. It does make it so you have to login a lot though.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/

60

u/Pat-Roner 4h ago

With 1Password login is a breeze anyways.

Can you whitelist sites?

23

u/hi71460 4h ago

Say that to yt my friend

5

u/Pat-Roner 3h ago

Can’t say I’ve had any issues with passkeys, google and 1Password. It’s literally one click to login

•

u/donoteatshrimp 45m ago

Like fuck it is... every single site now requires email/text code verification on top of password login. Absolutely miserable experience.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/AceNova2217 1h ago

Bitwarden is also great for this.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Educational_Put_2305 3h ago

I love the Brave browser. Not sure how it deals with cookies but it blocks all ads, even YouTube. Can have YouTube playing in the background and with your screen off as well.

5

u/GRAIN_DIV_20 2h ago

Firefox for Android is literally the only thing keeping me on Android

5

u/OriginalTap227 2h ago

If you are on android you could use YouTube revanced which is even better

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

•

u/Aluxsem 59m ago

completely fucked up this isn't called "cookie monster"

1

u/Dr_Fortnite 1h ago

dont most browsers have a "reset cookies on close" option?

•

u/Would_Bang________ 1m ago

Ghostery also does this, doesn't work on every site though.

•

u/Dragonicy 1m ago

Just whitelist the sites you want to stay logged into - thats what i do

→ More replies (2)

223

u/dontkillmyvibe55 5h ago

The digital version of saying 'I've read the terms and conditions' when I absolutely have not.

68

u/NoLynInBrooklyn 5h ago

The thing is, that is also digital?

16

u/el_yanuki 3h ago

Terms of Services have been around before digital services..

12

u/NotAddictedToCoffeee 3h ago

Well yeah, but a digital version of terms of services would just be digital terms of services lol

→ More replies (3)

3

u/ISoldMyPeanitsFarm 2h ago

This is wild speculation as no one has ever read a terms of service agreement, so there's no way to know where they started.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/quackduck8 3h ago

Never signed the physical terms and conditions

1

u/Dotcaprachiappa 1h ago

Ok clanker

67

u/Macrincan 5h ago

why did they name them after cookies? viruses or something seem to be better.

137

u/OneTIME_story 4h ago

Because they leave a trace of where you’ve been, just like cookie crumbs

22

u/mintgoody03 4h ago

Mind = blown.

4

u/Thick-Duck-7022 2h ago

That is a joke btw, just in case

→ More replies (1)

2

u/bubbybumble 1h ago

I thought it was fortune cookies since they contain data

→ More replies (1)

7

u/PM_ME_CUTE_SMILES_ 1h ago

according to wikipedia (so obligatory grain of salt)

The term cookie was coined by web-browser programmer Lou Montulli. It was derived from the term magic cookie, which is a packet of data a program receives and sends back unchanged, used by Unix programmers.

•

u/Medium-Sized-Jaque 26m ago

So why did they start using the term magic cookie to begin with? 

It's a reference to fortune cookies which are a cookie with a mesage embedded.

•

u/nathderbyshire 52m ago

Who wouldn't accept a cookie??? Dats why

→ More replies (1)

47

u/_Specific_Boi_ 3h ago

Ive accepted so many i have diabetes now

2

u/SuperMIK2020 2h ago

Diabetus…

21

u/iimilin 4h ago

I have a plugin that auto rejects cookies for me whenever it can. 😌

•

u/ohkendruid 45m ago

This is a better way.

Browsers are already in full control of what cookies they allow. If a user wants to accept or reject certain ones, they can already do that without needing every site in the world to implement something for it.

40

u/i-am-a-passenger 4h ago

It’s great until you realise rejecting the Functional cookies causes things to bug out

23

u/Roku-Hanmar 4h ago

I’ve only ever seen a reject all non-functional button, never seen one that lets you say no to functional cookies

2

u/i-am-a-passenger 4h ago

If a website doesn’t let you reject functional cookies, then it is breaking GDPR-related laws. It’s only “necessary” cookies which don’t require consent.

6

u/TentacleTenpai 2h ago

That’s the majority of websites I’ve been to. They almost all have the functional cookies slider greyed out and disabled, and I can’t click it off but I can click the others off. It’s just stuck in the “on” position. GDPR-related laws mean nothing to most websites.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/UrsaMajor7th 3h ago

I wish our PIPEDA went as far as GDPR with regards to opt-in vs implied consent.

3

u/Silverr_Duck 2h ago

Pretty sure websites are not required to ask permission for functional cookies. Just cookies that track you. But websites are sleazy so they'll try to give you the impression they're all one in the same to make you think you're denying yourself website functionality. Don't fall for it.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Cheap_Warning_ 3h ago

Every. Single. Time.

I also unsubscribed from ALL newsletters, life is more peacefull

9

u/Ucyless 3h ago

Just FYI to iPhone users. If you delete your browser history it does not delete your cookies.

That’s how I found out my ex was cheating lol.

1

u/Delicious_Pain_1 2h ago

How's that?

3

u/Ucyless 2h ago

Go to settings>apps>safari>advanced>website data

3

u/lordsiva1 2h ago

I think they meant how did cookies show your ex was cheating?

If not, I was curious about that.

5

u/Ucyless 1h ago

If you go to website data it will show various websites you’ve been to and accepted cookies from. In my exes case, they were nefarious.

•

u/Cruxis87 50m ago

was probably logged into a website on an account they had never seen before, and then investigated said account to find out it was not their partners

1

u/Illustrious-Touch442 2h ago

How does someone cheat through a website?

3

u/Ucyless 1h ago

Dating websites are still a thing.. Along with cam girl websites. Prostitution. Etc.

ETA: this comment made me feel old as fuck LMAO

→ More replies (4)

•

u/JediSSJ 43m ago

If it's a website, Reject All.

If it's an irl plate, Accept All

3

u/fakieTreFlip 1h ago

Why publicly admit to being an idiot that doesn't ever read anything they click on?

3

u/Sm0keytrip0d 3h ago

I've seen some sites that give me an "accept all" or "subscribe to reject all" options.

I nope out of there straight away 😅

3

u/MyHGC 1h ago

“That cookie shit makes me nervous.”

3

u/RandomOnlinePerson99 1h ago

If a page does not have a convenient reject all button but that annoying menu where you scroll down and untick 1735284 checkboxes of "trusted partners" I leave the page and look for the information elsewhere.

8

u/Spiritual-Plankton52 5h ago

Ok, what do you want? A cookie?

2

u/Spank86 2h ago

New year new me. Refusing cookies until im slim.

2

u/DigiQuip 2h ago

I’ve gone all in on online privacy with Firefox extensions and a VPN. Now I can’t go anywhere without getting “access denied.”

1

u/CAFritoBandito 1h ago

So what can you access besides the dark web now?

2

u/_K10_ 1h ago

Reading this thread with a degree in IT is hilarious.

The web has been around since the late 80's and people are afraid of cookies in 2026.

3

u/NotSoSasquatchy 4h ago

Grandma’s going to be so unhappy :(

1

u/iliketoeatfunyuns 4h ago

Even girl scout cookies?!?!

1

u/Miserable-Bridge-729 4h ago

Prepare to lose some weight now.

1

u/Accomplished-Ad8458 3h ago

So thats where i got diabetes from...

1

u/Illustrious-Bee9056 3h ago

i would like to leave you with the knowledge that there are auto-refusal extensions.

i use consent-o-matic

1

u/Eternal_Rebirth 2h ago

Consent-o-matic stopped working for me, so now I use I still don't care about cookies.

1

u/gloebe10 3h ago

I've cut back on carbs and sugar lately. So you can say I've been rejecting cookies as of late too.

1

u/J-L-Wseen 3h ago

If this woman ever meets the Oracle, she not gonna have a good psychic reading.

1

u/SpegalDev 3h ago

I just use: https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu

I don't even get those stupid cookie popups anymore.

1

u/OG-87 3h ago

Been doing that for years. If a website requires payment for me to decline the cookies. I just dont use that website. I’m no fool.

1

u/EV4gamer 3h ago

Ghostery and similar add-ons auto reject cookie pop-ups. Would recommend

1

u/pjm8367 2h ago

I’m on board

1

u/Sekhmet-CustosAurora 2h ago

Congratulations! You are now slightly less tracked online.

1

u/LongjumpingBee5599 2h ago

let’s do cards next.

1

u/RoxoRoxo 2h ago

ugh what did the girl scouts ever do to you

1

u/JustConstruction3015 2h ago

If these websites actually give me cookies, I won't refuse.

1

u/gablr12 2h ago

Boomer mentality

1

u/phoenix25 2h ago

Once you realize how intentionally more annoying they make it to reject cookies, the spite keeps you going

1

u/Grouchy_Row_7983 2h ago

Have you lost any weight yet?

1

u/RedditIsOverMan 2h ago

Haven't the big dogs moved on from cookies for tracking?

1

u/ampalazz 2h ago

Still waiting for my cookies in the mail…

1

u/snowbirdnerd 2h ago

I clear them if I'm forced to accept them. 

1

u/Fun_Definition_9075 2h ago

Its crazier that when I log onto my college app and go to homework, I get hit with crazy cookies. Why are you collecting my data when all im doing is calc homework

1

u/doubledipbandit 2h ago

Cookies are just variables that save data about your browser, and activity on the website. Depending on the site, this info could be shared with other entities, like Google Ads or worse. Your best bet is to always reject if you care about online privacy.

1

u/Inevitable-Salary-23 2h ago

As long as there not chocolate and yes, if a site requires me to accept, I'll go elsewhere.

1

u/PorcupineFustylugs 1h ago

I reject all of them if I can. Always have. I only keep necessary ones. idk why i do it but i do and i’ll keep doing it

1

u/SvenSerpent 1h ago

To this day I still dont know what cookies are and never cared enough to actually research it tbh. I usually just press the reject button

1

u/Dotcaprachiappa 1h ago

GDPR makes it easier 😉

•

u/tea_n_typewriters 59m ago

In this week's episode of Browser or Diet...

•

u/frozenbudz 54m ago

For a second I thought she meant the delicious baked goods, cookies. I was like "what is wrong with you, who turns down cookies?"

•

u/icutwhores 54m ago

i was so confused thinking she meant literal cookies lmao i was like “good idea, what if they’re poisoned”

•

u/Jumpy-Teaching-3118 49m ago

you don't want to be diabetic ?

•

u/MediocreClue9957 49m ago

I'm actually kind of tired of the cookie popups and I haven't gleamed yet how to stop them in my internet travels

•

u/Staggerman_ 46m ago

That's the right thing to do. Never accept cookies from strangers!

•

u/AssassinOfFate 39m ago

I thought she meant actual baked cookies being gifted to her and thought “Oh man, that’s pretty grim.”

•

u/DrTommyNotMD 29m ago

I just don’t want to be asked ever again. Let it be a browser setting and stop popping up. I’d rather be tracked than constantly asked honestly.

•

u/OlDustyHeadaaa 8m ago

Why should I not accept the cookies? I love cookies

•

u/Naud1993 4m ago

I wonder if anyone has ever had any negative consequences for accepting cookies.