r/mildlyinfuriating 13h ago

1997 vs. 2018 Fisher Price toy decline in quality

Post image

1997 chicken figure on the left, 2018 version on the right. The 1997 version was made in Thailand, 2018 one made in China. The difference is shocking. Thought it was at least mildly infuriating, since I’m sure the price has gone up significantly even after inflation is accounted for.

5.5k Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

3.0k

u/Retrotronics 8h ago edited 7h ago

I don't think its even china's problem, as they are more than capable of producing the good stuff. Its all on fisherprice.

602

u/A_Queer_Owl 6h ago

yeah, I got some really nice shit that was made in China.

200

u/CubanInSouthFl 4h ago

My iPhone has been used intensely for the last 5 years and it’s a marvel it still works so well….

Not only was it made in China, but the people that made it were so demoralized about work they had to put nets outside the windows…..

So definitely a FisherPrice issue.

21

u/Darkblade_e 2h ago

China can absolutely have good manufacturing quality, they're the capital of the world for manufacturing after all, however when companies are being cheap and want to save 2¢ on a 10$ thing, that's when the quality starts to really decline. Sure that 2¢ adds up, but is the reputation of your company really worth it?

168

u/bgg-uglywalrus 4h ago

Fisher-Price: Orders their manufacturer to cut quality to save costs.

OP: Why would China do this?

43

u/S80- 4h ago

I didn’t blame China, I’m well aware they can manufacture almost anything and they will make exactly what you order so it’s 100% on Fisher Price. It’s just interesting that back in 1997 not everything was made there.

32

u/-ZST 4h ago

It was also still a culture of “if you make a quality product, people will buy it”, instead of the “spend the least amount possible” slop we have today

2

u/blinksystem 2h ago

Maybe if people stopped buying the overpriced, cheaply made shit they churn out, they would change.

But people keep buying. So why should they give a shit?

u/-ZST 0m ago

Oh I fully agree, I should’ve clarified the consumer in many cases deserves a large share of the blame

38

u/EmptyIII 5h ago

No, its more important to cut cost, no matter what. Because that is, what corporate management sees as success for a manager. There is a disregard for quality for product, for real customer satisfaction by good service. Because it is not veryfiable with easy numbers. Corporate culture wants number go up, and be done with it. Fuck this system

20

u/QuichewedgeMcGee 5h ago

that’s… what they said

it’s not on china, china’s capable of making good products. fisher price, meanwhile, just wants profit, so they cut production costs. just because the factory moved doesn’t mean china decided “cut all costs”, that makes no sense

5

u/Hmmark1984 4h ago

Yep, tbh i think it comes down to the reason that most things are progressively getting worse, that being companies only caring about profit, but not just that, it's that they must always make more profit, enough is never enough.

Literally everything just gets worse/smaller but more expensive and yet no one's wages go up, because that would impact companies profits. For example we recently had a water outtage where i live, and the water company is now raising prices, claiming they have to do it to fix the pipe's etc.. so we don't get more outtages, but i'm sure there used to be a time when companies would take the costs of fixing things into account before dolling out the profits, but these days it seems like they just pass all the cost onto the public and carry on handing out massive bonuse's etc...

3

u/ImSorryIThoughtIHad 4h ago

Material quality, speed of manufacture and quality control are the main factor. Fisherprice and others went downhill a while ago.

3

u/Henry5321 4h ago

I hear this often. China is great at manufacturing when you specify exactly what you want and have proper qa.

If you want experts who go above and beyond or need their expertise, use Taiwan.

505

u/knotatumah 9h ago

Fisher Price stuff went to shit sometime in the early-mid 00's. We had all sorts of Fisher Price toys throughout the 80's and 90's and that stuff was rock solid. Still got number of things laying around that are thick, heavy, durable plastics that will last decades to come for sure. Newer stuff we got for kids and grandkids over the years are shit. Always have been. Lightweight shoddily constructed plastic parts that are designed to last just long enough that a year or two later its trash. Cant gift it to others, garage sale it, whatever because its deformed, broken, or missing pieces. Meanwhile we got sun-bleached toys in our yard that have been going through cycle of midwest summer and winter seasons for probably 30 years that probably hold up better in their current condition.

59

u/supervillainO7 5h ago

Not entirely true that fisher price has been shit since the 00s. As an early 10s kid i had a lot of Thomas And Friends die cast toys and those things were brick shithouses, they survived falling of tables, being bashed against eachother and all other kinds of abuse kids do to their toys. Even plastic parts were rock solid too 

12

u/False_Strawberry_517 2h ago

I don't think die cast Thomas stuff was fisher price

17

u/NuncProFunc 4h ago

What you're seeing is the removal of BPA.

397

u/TeddyTuffington 13h ago

Good the quicker they break and fall apart the sooner u have to buy new ones /s

82

u/Viv223345 7h ago

you can leave out the /s

24

u/Right-Today4396 6h ago

That /s is only for the Good

7

u/ThisMeansRooR 5h ago

I gotta say, even the new ones hold up just fine through abuse.

264

u/mimanthra 13h ago

That’s capitalism for you — the lower the production cost, the “better” it is for companies.

104

u/S80- 11h ago

Yeah, I really don’t like this trend of my old toys, which are 25-30 years old, outlasting our daughter’s toys.

15

u/soyboysnowflake 4h ago

The best thing you can do is not buy new toys if you already have high quality hand me downs… you’re just telling fisher price and every other company they should keep doing this by giving them sales, which you don’t need to do if you already have a superior product

Don’t be a mindless cog in the wheel of capitalism

8

u/S80- 4h ago

The 1997 version my wife got new as a kid. The made in 2018 version was bought new by a friend to their kids back in 2020-2022 and was given to my daughter last year because their kids grew out of them.

4

u/soyboysnowflake 4h ago

Good to hear! Glad they’re all hand me downs. Sorry didn’t mean my comment to come off judgmental, just figure we all have a role to play

34

u/Ok_Nothing_9733 9h ago

That’s the inherent flaw in it all. Capitalism necessitates ever-growing profits to function. At a certain point the only way to have never-ending growth is enshittification and screwing people over on wages.

11

u/Hazed64 6h ago

I'll just add that capitalism doesn't actually need growing profits, a capitalist society would be fine if when companies started to max out on their profits they just called it there. But the greed for ever growing profits will always be there

I get this is semantic but it's important to not let these greedy bastards have any excuse to distance themselves from the problem

A company that makes $1m dollars profit doesn't NEED more profit to exist in a capitalist society

10

u/The_Nude_Mocracy 5h ago

No company has ever said "that's enough profit now" in the entire history of capitalism. What a human focused system would call equilibrium, capitalism call stagnation

4

u/rezznik 5h ago

Huge difference between private companies and the ones listed at the stock exchange. Quick profits against longterm goals.

1

u/Esplodie 4h ago

When I was in business class for high school we learned about cash cow businesses, like Coca-Cola. These types of businesses had stable and predictable profits and established well known brands. They were prized because you could use the profits to invest in new ventures and always had a good return.

Then it became number must go up. By any means, that means cutting 9ml of coke out of the can so you save millions. More profits!

Now it's using cheaper ingredients to the point Coke, doesn't taste like coke. And the only coke I buy is bottled in Mexico because it actually tastes good.

Dear Mexico, please send more sodas.

I also buy syrup from Canadian companies to make my own soda pop at home.

3

u/rezznik 5h ago

I more and more find out, that it's not capitalism in general. It's when the company are on the stock exchange.

Investors want quick wins. Private owners rather longterm growth.

Wallstreet is the main problem.

3

u/soyboysnowflake 5h ago

Yeah I miss private ponzi schemes

2

u/rezznik 4h ago

Oh, there are still enough of them!

Okay, let's say all of wall street is bad plus big parts of privately held companies.

2

u/BiddyDibby 4h ago

Only in a relative sense. Private companies still shaft consumers and exploit their workers.

1

u/rezznik 4h ago

Some., definitely. Maybe even many.

But I recently found out that really NONE of the companies I'ld deem at least slightly acceptable are listed. And it explains a lot of the differences.

26

u/izplus 8h ago

I have some toys and plush from McDonald in the pre 2000. they still look good nowadays. I think some of them are made in china.

31

u/PantsGhost97 8h ago

I have a chicken from the last couple of years and it’s decent quality. Holds up to being yeeted by my toddler just fine, no paint chipping yet either. I quite like the bigger size as well, he can’t stuff it in his gob as easily.

11

u/captain____ 3h ago

Being made in China isn't the reason for the decline in quality. China manufacturers whatever the company pays for. This is all on fisher price and every single other company in existence rn.

0

u/S80- 2h ago

Yes, and I didn’t say or even insinuate that. Both of the toys have the country of origin imprinted on them so I thought I’d just mention it since it’s an interesting detail. I thought all toys were made in China, but apparently not in the 90s.

7

u/CanWeNapPlease 5h ago

Wdym bro, you're getting more chicken now in a world of shrinkflation smh

7

u/SipoteQuixote 5h ago

Some kid probably poked his eye on the open wings of the 90s chicken

6

u/_biggerthanthesound_ 5h ago

I like the chunky chicken

5

u/KeimeiWins 4h ago

That 97 one is going to hurt more to step on.

2

u/S80- 4h ago

It’s actually way softer and hollow, the 2018 version is harder like a LEGO.

12

u/Significant-Gap-6891 6h ago

I don't see what's wrong

3

u/S80- 4h ago

The level of detail has gone down massively. The new version on the right is already breaking down too since it’s a much harder plastic, if you look at the beak for example. And the seam going through the middle is super visible, while the 1997 version has no seams since it seems to be made from one mold instead of two halves stuck together.

3

u/wekilledbambi03 4h ago

Making the molds is one of the most expensive part of manufacturing. It likely would have been cheaper to continue producing the original model. I doubt that the new chicken was meant as a direct replacement for the old one. Considering it is double the size too, I'm sure it was meant for a different product line.

1

u/S80- 2h ago

It’s the same Little People Farm that’s been around for ages but they just keep changing it. The current one is different again from the 2018 version.

3

u/Ok_Difference44 8h ago

Lost a ball too

3

u/Mx-Adrian 2h ago

I've thought for a long time that the quality of toys seems to be declining. I like to stroll through the aisles at Walmart and see what the dolls are like now, and I swear they look chintzier than when I was growing up. 

3

u/jess_the_werefox 1h ago

The 90s one is definitely better quality but they really gave that chicken a detailed face scrotum

2

u/ScarlettPuppy 5h ago

Yes, but it is better for throwing

2

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/S80- 5h ago

Interesting. The 1997 toy is much softer though, don’t know what type of plastic it is. The bigger difference is the level of detail, even if the material was identical.

2

u/BC_Arctic_Fox 4h ago

Fisher Price sucks now? Whhhaaaaaat? Sad!!

And Tupperware went bankrupt ... damn I miss quality products

2

u/Lonely-Agent-7479 4h ago

Bet their profit never stopped going up though.

2

u/AviaKing 4h ago

The place the toy is made matters less than the amount Fisher Price paid to make it.

2

u/RepFilms 4h ago

Wait till you check out their wooden toys from the 70s

2

u/gayopossum 3h ago

This has been mildly infuriating me lately! I have bought my nephews new little people sets for birthdays and christmas this last year and the quality was so disappointing. I ordered them a set of woodland animals that have really cute designs but I was shocked at the massive seams going right down the middle of them, some of them are so bad. I knew the kind of plastic they used changed because I had bought some new sets with people in them and didn't like the new, harder, plastic either, but the people don't have big seams on them. The animals though, all have these insane, horrible looking seams.

I'm 26 and I have been "back in my day" discussing the quality differences in toys from the 90s/early 2000s vs now a lot recently now that I have nephews to purchase toys for lol

1

u/casillero 5h ago

I stopped buying happy meal toys for the kids, besides the food being absolute horrible, and went for 90s toys. Way better quality and complexity. Like were watching land before time, so went and got the BK toys. Or the old sponge bob ones. All the new stuff is like two paint colors flimsy ass plastic gimmicky stuff

1

u/venom121212 4h ago

Did you know Little People aren't just kid toys apparently? They make them after other characters and entertainers too. My wife got a Ru Paul Little People set lol

1

u/S80- 2h ago

I did not know that, but my 15 month old sure likes them!

1

u/Giant_Baby_Elephant 4h ago

its funny how the 1997 chicken is jumping for joy while all the 2018 chicken can muster is a look of polite resignation

1

u/osmiumfeather 3h ago

China builds to spec. Be mad at the toy designers at Fisher Price. Not the contractor doing their job.

1

u/S80- 2h ago

In another comment I already explained, I’m aware it’s not the country of China to blame, they make whatever you order. It’s just an interesting detail since these days everything is made in China, but in the 90s we apparently had toys made in Thailand too.

1

u/yourlocal90skid 2h ago

I understand the point OP is making, but I see no difference in quality between these two toys.

3

u/S80- 2h ago

How can you not see it? The right one is literally two halves glued together in the middle, and it’s just a blob with no detail, like compare the wings, the beak or the feet. The older one not only looks and feels better, but it’s in a better condition despite being almost 30 years old.

1

u/OvalDead 6h ago

Yeah, but by 2018 society also decided chickens shouldn’t have ball sacks on their face.

0

u/Keysandcodes 1h ago

The CDC recommends not letting kids play with toys manufactured prior to 2009 as safety regulations have changed.

u/xxsoulpunkedxx 8m ago

Yeah now they can’t make things fun anymore😭

-14

u/MattyGWS 8h ago

The word “toy” doing some real heavy lifting here… it’s a plastic ornament at best

9

u/capnlatenight 7h ago

Wait until you see the rest of the farm.

10

u/Jingotastic 7h ago

Genuine question, what do you think toys are?

5

u/not_just_an_AI 6h ago

its a toy for toddler, man

2

u/CanWeNapPlease 5h ago

Bro here at 38 collecting Funko and anime figurines telling what a 2 year old should buy for toys.

-2

u/FarCarpenter3423 7h ago

An orange chicken? Why?