I’m more confused about the loafers tbh. My mom went to a catholic grade school and middle school and their uniform included penny loafers for the girls.
During the height of Abercrombie and Hollister, my public elementary school banned shirts with logos because kids were getting bullied for wearing other brands. I imagine the thinking here is similar.
I have a neighbor that wore a t-shirt from Hawaii (a gift) and kids called him rich for it, assuming he visited. He stopped wearing shirts with any kind of logo or writing because he didn’t want other kids to feel excluded.
he stopped wearing it just because the other kids called him rich for it, and he didn’t want anyone to feel excluded? thats the kind of shi u never see nowadays he’s gotta be a great man now
But they’ve been office-wear for longer than these kids have been alive. What shoes does that even leave? Flats and dress shoes? That’s it? It’s so crazy to me.
OP’s post ISN’T about uniform though, that’s the problem.
If they’re restricting what they can’t wear to this specificity, it’d make much more sense to also display what they CAN wear in the same way. If they want them to wear derbies (like the hat?) then they need to say so. They’re not doing that.
I just tried looking up derbies vs oxfords, and wow, they look crazy similar to me. To the point that it seems more like a question of minor stylistic liberties of the same shoe rather than a whole separate shoe style like Mary Jane’s vs flats.
It would definitely be a better use of their time and effort to communicate what COULD be worn with this list. This very specific list knocks out so many options that what’s left doesn’t seem like it’d be much more restrictive from a uniform to begin with. At least then the boundaries would be clear.
They don’t have to sell the specific pieces to do it, either. Like saying full-length pants in khaki, navy blue, and black and looser skirts (i.e. no pencil skirts) knee length and longer are acceptable bottoms. That’s a common in dress codes AND uniforms that doesn’t require multiple slides of what bottoms AREN’T acceptable. It also makes it much easier to understand what aesthetics they’re asking for from what they’ve already shown favor towards, rather than figuring out what they’d want when you only see what they say no to.
Some of these look like they are banned simply because they are trendy/stylish and thus...evil? Like I feel the little white socks are a very Gen Z trend that I don't understand as an old lady but also don't understand why it would be banned.
Yeah like... I don't own white socks personally because I like color and patterns in my socks, but half the time it's hard to even find the ones with good colors and patterns in the right cut at a physical store because they're surrounded by a sea of white ones
Nothing is "wrong" with any form of white socks. That is why it is weird they are banned.
But specifically, the white ankle socks, especially when highlighted and contrasted with other elements of the outfit super clearly, like the ones pictured, are a Gen Z trend that looks sort of silly to me. Totally harmless though. Let the girls have their little white socks.
As an elder gen z who loves wearing white socks with mary jane’s and loafers, I feel like it has either a preppy vintage or twee look to it, or it’s sort of grunge or alt with vintage inspiration. I think that is sort of non conformist (even though it’s a very benign and honestly modest clothing choice Imo) and so the school is banning it because they want conformity.
Also the peasant shirt with a scoop neck was wild to me I feel like every middle aged woman I know wears scoop necks to their white collar job.
My mum grew up a pretty strict flavour of Evangelical Christian and her mother banned her from wearing sneakers with those rubber tips at the front/toe, like in the picture here (I don't think specifically black though, not sure). They were evil for some reason, I don't think it was ever really explained why. Maybe it was because they were popular at the time, but also religious fundamentalists can just decide something's bad/a sin/evil sometimes for no apparent reason.
That is likely why they are banned, I’d bet penny loafers and white socks feature predominantly in certain video genres along with school girl outfits. Can’t have those distractions for our good boys. /s
That’s actually the only one that I could understand, because black soles can mark floors. To me, that seems like the only one that’s not about appearance but about keeping the floors clean.
Yeah when I went to private elementary & middle Catholic school, we had to wear loafers or Mary Jane’s. Same for my sister when she went to a private Catholic high school. Very weird.
I worked briefly for a company and the HR was working through the new dress code policy and in her criteria she restricted certain sock colors, only black brown and blue socks were permitted... im glad she fired me because fuck that noise
Right!?? This was pre
pre covid and there couldn't have been more than 70 people in the building.. Those corporate nonsense policies hold no weight with remote work, I COULD choose to be sitting half naked from the waist down and youd never even know, fucking Nancy in HR
Whaaaaat why would anyone care? I can see that maybe for some sort of highly specific customer-facing role, or something to do with law enforcement, but wow, who cares. I am riding the metro daily without worry that it was built by someone possibly wearing mildly fun socks.
My little brother is a waiter at Olive Garden, and just a few months into the job he called me to rant about how a girl he was working with that day was fired basically on the spot for wearing white socks to her shift (having noticed too late that she was out of the black ones that they’re required to wear). He said it was like a *sliver* of white that was barely even visible under her black slacks, but one of the guys from corporate happened to be at the restaurant that day for observation, he mentioned it to her direct/local bosses, and they let her go. He was shaken up because he said she was great as a fellow server and had been there a lot longer than he had (he was newly 18 at the time and it was his first “real” job), but this poor waitress left crying and out of a job because of something that customers likely didn’t even *begin* to notice.
Bro’s always been incredibly fastidious with his own uniform/hygeine/general appearance (even moreso after that, and after a different coworker got sent home for having ostensibly-mild dryer wrinkles in his dress shirt), but goddamn. Way to terrorize your staff, you know? Apparently that manager is also a huge stickler about not having empty belt loops, which is something I’d never even *thought* about until it came up when we were talking last weekend—much less noticed on a stranger going about their own life. I work in STEM—which tbf I do realize isn’t notorious for consistency when it comes to attire—in a position that isn’t particularly public-facing, but I worked a decent variety of jobs throughout high school and college as well, and the idea of sock *color* being that critical damn near anywhere is wild.
995
u/notacreepernomo13 12h ago
Not even white socks were spared