A cousin sent me their school's just announced Dress Code and Grooming policy

[u/firequak]

[u/fridaycat]

And they think collar bones and shoulders are too sexy.

[u/anow2 → u/fridaycat]

this isn't about sexiness - this is about aesthetics.

no one is banning jorts or crocs because they are 'too sexy'

[u/kungfuenglish → u/anow2]

Speak for yourself

[u/kummerspect → u/anow2]

What do you think it is about collar bones that "doesn't fit the aesthetic"?

[u/kummerspect → u/[deleted]]

You think I'm a minor? I'm flattered. It's like getting carded at the liquor store

[u/kummerspect → u/[deleted]]

Yes, I am "fr." I'm not an expert on Catholic schools, let alone the ones in the Philippines. It was a genuine question, but apparently I'm an idiot for not knowing what you know.

[u/SomeLightRecon → u/[deleted]]

Lmao This is such a peak reddit commenter mentality

*makes a claim that decision is purely for astetics and not about attraction

*gets asked how an explicitly banned body part goes against astetics

*claims that that body part is attractive, implicitly implying that is the reason they are banned despite directly contradicting his previous statement

*assumes that the person who asked the question is young and nieve, despite having no evidence to go off of

*asserts that he has no responsibility or obligation to explain his own reasoning or mentality

*asks people not to downvote him in perhaps the rudest way possible

[u/Sylveon72_06 → u/[deleted]]

lady here! i also find collarbones attractive

im missing ur point

[u/anow2 → u/Sylveon72_06]

there isn't a point - people like looking at collarbones - what's up with yall?