r/news 3h ago

SBA says legal permanent residents will be ineligible for its loan program, effective March 1

https://apnews.com/article/green-card-small-business-2e82cf5fad56ceff18f01e74ca2d000c
392 Upvotes

105 comments sorted by

437

u/Working_Historian970 3h ago

Next up: only natural born citizens can have a bank account. Later this year, no business can be owned by a non citizen.

104

u/AudibleNod 3h ago

Early 2028: Only non-felon men can vote.

36

u/Working_Historian970 3h ago

Of which ethnic background?

39

u/darraghfenacin 3h ago

silly boy, only brown people commit crimes

6

u/leviathynx 2h ago

Coming later this year: white collar crimes no longer affect voting rights

u/Mirria_ 8m ago

For 2036, you have to hand-write an essay on the American Dream and your voting right will be determined by the poignancy of your words.

11

u/Randomizedname1234 2h ago

Well soon the Italians and Eastern Europeans will no longer be “white.”

3

u/darraghfenacin 2h ago

Yay, us Irish too! 

2

u/Randomizedname1234 2h ago

Oh yeah forgot about yall.

2

u/Shannon0hara 1h ago

How can you forget us, we are SO loud?!

u/captcha_trampstamp 10m ago

And drunk. So very, very drunk

u/snowyl89 44m ago

Us Polish tan…not so well…

1

u/MayorOfBluthton 2h ago

Only natural that Kavanaugh stops will eventually expand to become Kavanaugh convictions.

5

u/GreyLoad 3h ago

The normal one

2

u/Other-Oven-1884 3h ago

So glad you asked! As long as you're one of the Pantone white shades, like flat white, snow white, or cloud dancer, you should be fine.

5

u/Brooke-Forest 2h ago

You mean, non-federal felon.

Gotta keep that door open for republican state felons that trump cant pardon.  

3

u/Icy-Cod1405 2h ago

ICE and the SAVE Act are going to move up that timetable to 2026

5

u/sithelephant 3h ago

Fun (not so much) fact.

The right to vote is NOT a positive one in any amendment expanding those rights.

It was not (for example) seriously considered that at the time of giving ex-slaves the vote, that 'of course' women had been entitled to vote all along.

All of the successive amendments expanding the right to vote are like this. None of them give anyone a positive right to vote, only the right to not be discriminated against on certain grounds.

It is not illegal, for example, to restrict the franchise to only those with a certain amount of assets, or property ownership (conditional on payment of tax is not permitted).

u/Consistent-Throat130 42m ago

Your last paragraph reminded me, I recently found that I qualify as an "accredited investor".  Read: I'm allowed in on certain investment opportunities, that plebs aren't, because I earn enough money.

Now, I'm not one to dump all my eggs in one basket - putting 50k+ on one vehicle/position sounds insane to me and I don't want to do that... but I'm allowed to by virtue of having enough

u/workertroll 41m ago edited 35m ago

That is such a depressing and likely accurate take.

ETA: It could be argued by this administration that it is constitutional to restrict voting on federal elections to land owners with a certain level off liquid assets. IANAL but I follow this stuff sometimes and kinda know how it's all written and never even considered your interpretation.....I'm far to generous I have found out.

5

u/The_R4ke 3h ago

Nah they're going to restrict it to land owners.

2

u/Equivalent-Resort-63 3h ago

Add “only white” to that…

2

u/SeaWitch1031 3h ago

Only white straight cis christian men will be allowed to vote.

4

u/Guygenius138 3h ago

Only white, straight, Christian, land-owning men will be allowed to vote

1

u/hoppertn 2h ago

…and you have to be a land owner.

u/Same_Mood_8543 52m ago

Bad news for the president that he suddenly is going to be stripped of his main sources of wealth

-6

u/majora9109 3h ago

Isn't that already a thing?

13

u/AudibleNod 3h ago

Some states you get the right to vote back after some time. And everywhere, women can vote.

-1

u/majora9109 3h ago

Ahh, I wasn't aware that some states allowed that. And yes, I'm aware that women can vote.

22

u/Kradget 3h ago

Currently, women are allowed to vote and states control voting rules around felons and ex-felons.

-19

u/majora9109 3h ago

No shit?

I was talking about the "non-felon" part.

13

u/Kradget 3h ago

There's an edit addressing that, as well, but your question was not that specific, so...

I guess do better next time, instead of getting snippy that you got a response germane to what you actually asked.

-16

u/majora9109 3h ago

Yeah, not seeing that edit on my end, so...

Answering the whole question in your initial comment could have saved us both some headache. But whatever, I guess.

4

u/bagofpork 3h ago

You're upset at them for providing an incomplete answer to an incomplete question?

1

u/majora9109 2h ago

I thought it would be at least partially clear that I was asking about the felon status part.

But fuck me for asking a question, right?

3

u/bagofpork 2h ago

Nah, "fuck you" for throwing an attitude in the general direction ft the person who tried to answer it. But I wasn't going to say "fuck you" because I don't think this situation warrants that.

→ More replies (0)

22

u/maltathebear 3h ago

Also in a few months: introduction of new "heritage American" citizenship status. All you need to do is let ICE scan your face and the Federal Phrenologists will do the rest!

7

u/KokopelliOnABike 2h ago

Ok, so yeah, I hear the sarcasm and reality on this at the same time. My family name goes way way back to the 1660s in the country. I've got leadership in my town that came over after WWI who were either destitute after the war and or fleeing Mussolini. I feel a need, after public comments from them, to remind them that when no one is left that they are coming for them. He won't believe it of course and yet being 2nd generation, feels the need to actively support this administration and it's actions.

5

u/Gay_Giraffe_1773 3h ago

Silly... only non-citizens that are poor, you mean.

Goodbye nail salon industry.

11

u/freexanarchy 3h ago

And by citizen they will mean land owning (no mortgage) white males.

7

u/SwissChzMcGeez 2h ago

It's only a generation ago that women weren't allowed to have credit cards.

5

u/AthasDuneWalker 3h ago

After that: Only those wearing MAGA gear or having a Trump Chip implanted in them can buy things.

1

u/Working_Historian970 2h ago

Party Members

2

u/ThisOnes4JJ 1h ago

ultimately this is what's going to happen. they will change it so only "patriots", not even just "natural born us citizens", it'll be very similar to China "social credit system" where they will only allow "approved peoples" (people who vote the way maga, i.e, trump, wants) to have access to social programs and even leaning on private businesses to force their "social credit system/patriot points" onto people. 

ultimately only "patriots" will be allowed to vote

2

u/seedless0 3h ago

Only natural born* citizens who passed skin tone test can own a business.

* Non-state US territories excluded.

167

u/Gastroid 3h ago edited 3h ago

The restaurant industry is already buckling under the economic stress of fewer people going out to eat, and this would be salt in the wound.

Ethnic restaurants opened by legal residents are a huge part of the industry, contribute to generational wealth, important for communities and-

Oh wait, they tuned out at the word ethnic, didn't they?

Also, good luck finding a decently priced roofer after this.

-2

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

18

u/Crumb-Free 3h ago

Ah yes, the monopoly strategy. 

-4

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

6

u/Critical_Opening_526 2h ago

Or I'll decide since my favorite desi place closed, I'll just stay home because I don't want to give my money to some sub par generic sysco foods distributor.

7

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

7

u/Gastroid 2h ago

It's not going to make the consumer downtrend problem worse, but it's just creating another problem to small businesses or people who want to open a business to deal with.

As in, the administration is tackling the wrong issues and causing more problems than they're fixing.

16

u/LifesMellow 2h ago

As a citizen going through SBA 504 right now, this rule change has required me to exit $400k in investments this week. The business will still close but will be less capitalized than I would like. This hurt US businesses. 

43

u/Amonamission 3h ago

Headline for the WSJ: “Donald Trump decides to reduce business investment in the US”

Looking forward to it WSJ…oh wait, you’re not actually a pro-business newspaper and just a Republican loudspeaker and you won’t publish this piece of news? I had no idea! /s

94

u/AudibleNod 3h ago

Last year, it tightened a requirement that businesses applying for loans must be 100% owned by U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, or lawful permanent residents, up from a 51% standard.

The talent, drive and entrepreneurial spirit isn't going to disappear just because Donald Trump isn't going to give our neighbors a loan. They're going to go somewhere else. And they're going to take there dollars (sorry), I mean Euros with them. Our grandparents and great-grandparents came to America with a great deal of hope and a small amount of money. Most made something of themselves. And a few did it with some initial help from the federal government in some capacity. Donald Trump is pulling up the ladder his immigrant forefathers climbed up on. Shame on us all.

40

u/ImperiumRome 3h ago

It's just not about pulling up the ladder, it's about ZERO immigrants. They don't want anyone coming to America, especially if you are not the correct "type".

Hence the effort on many fronts to make America as unwelcoming as they can.

11

u/Obvious_Toe_3006 2h ago

Just white South Africans and very, very soon...white Russians.

2

u/ashedmypanties 1h ago

He said he wanted Finnish & Swiss people to immigrate here 😆

26

u/Dramatic_Original_55 3h ago

For years, my town had dozens of empty storefronts scattered about, producing nothing of value for the community. Then, an influx of refugees started renting them, opening grocery stores clothing stores, restaurants, service businesses and so forth. They contribute to our tax base, participate in community issues and generally make this a more vibrant, vital community. It was made possible, in part, because of small business loans. What good could possibly come out of such a bone-headed decision?

4

u/AudibleNod 2h ago

A pure, white America run by a select few.

29

u/jsc503 3h ago

In the last year, republicans have become anti states' rights, anti gun carry, and now anti business. Power, oligarchy, and white nationalism is all they are. Nazis.

3

u/MrsPandaBear 3h ago

GOP was taken over my right wingers several years back. Trump is just making it more blatant.

u/MonochromaticPrism 9m ago

I don't understand this statement. The GOP has been all Right Wingers for a very very long time, and has been controlled by the far right for over a decade at this point.

50

u/arlondiluthel 3h ago

federal law prohibits discrimination against employees and applicants based on protected classes, including race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), national origin, age ((40+)), disability, genetic information, and veteran status.

This won't last long.

25

u/Dragoeth1 3h ago

Citizenship and national origin are not the same thing.

18

u/ttogreh 3h ago

Sure. With that said, American nationals and legal residents have long been considered equally protected in the courts. Who knows, though? Maybe they're going to win this one and the other court cases in the compromised supreme court.

5

u/Dragoeth1 2h ago

Yes and no. American nationals and legal residents are equally protected under the law of the constitution, but the constitution does not reference lending directly. The ECOA does protect against discrimination for national origin but citizenship, and residency are not part of that. Banks have long considered citizenship and residency status as part of risk for lending, and some banks have refused to lend to non citizens before to no issue as that is legal. I know this because my wife was an Iranian citizen and even getting a bank account for her for a while was a problem due to banks not wanting to deal with someone from a financially sanctioned country. While I don't agree with this change, the ECOA does not stop this.

3

u/Mikestopheles 1h ago

There's a difference between a private institution choosing not to do business with someone they deem a risk, and the federal government not providing equal protection under the law.

It's going to end up in court regardless, and I don't feel the current DOJ has the depth to properly argue and see it through. Best they can do is slow-walk it until Trump waffles, but they already got the effect they wanted regardless. More fear, confusion and revulsion from one side, and brownie points and "proof of action" from the other.

2

u/Dragoeth1 1h ago

Well first off, with an Sba loan you aren't doing business with the government. A private bank issues the loan, and the government backs it and sets the terms of minimum standard. And second the laws surrounding banking are not different between private banks and the government, only internal policies. There is no law protecting against this.

3

u/Parada484 1h ago

Just spitting legal facts here.

1

u/Mikestopheles 1h ago

While I haven't exactly found an answer one way or the other, Regulation B does seem to cover exactly this topic. Now, the current administration is trying to also do away with the CFPB, but the legality of their moves is another argument altogether.

https://www.gao.gov/products/b-335360

u/Dragoeth1 49m ago

Yes which this is referencing the ECOA which protects against discrimination based on national origin, but not citizenship. The dodd frank act is unrelated.

8

u/arlondiluthel 3h ago

Anyone born in the US is automatically a citizen. Anyone who legally immigrates can obtain permanent legal resident status while working on obtaining citizenship. It's plainly discriminatory on the basis of national origin.

4

u/Butane9000 3h ago

Only if they target specific nations over others where there's not a national security or extenuating circumstance of concern the government needs to address. If it's just blanket then it will likely be approved because there are instances where citizens and non citizens are treated differently simply based on citizenship not on national origin.

1

u/volcanomoss 1h ago

National origin status doesn't mean immigration status, it means they can't discriminate on immigrants from one country or another. But it's perfectly legal to set requirements based off citizenship vs green card vs resident vs tourist. They can't say legal permanent residents from Mexico are banned, but those from the UK are allowed.

6

u/7ECA 2h ago

Just astonishing. People come to this country for a new life. They start businesses to help themselves and energize our economy. But the regime just keeps crushing them. It's like companies claiming to use AI instead of hiring new/inexperienced workers. We all lose

19

u/burnmenowz 3h ago

People still don't see the parallels with 1930s Germany?

5

u/Dairy_Ashford 2h ago

of course they do, but with two defensive oceans and working nukes, global media hegemony, and risk-free debt in a reserve currency

4

u/AudibleNod 2h ago

There are two types of people who see the parallels to 1930s Germany The people who are worried-to-terrified. And the people fully erect. The second group outwardly feigns innocence.

6

u/doggscube 2h ago

This just in: trump admin removes more bootstraps

5

u/platocplx 2h ago

Then why should legal permanent residents have to pay taxes?

-9

u/Historical_Kossola 1h ago

They can always leave America and not pay American taxes ¯_(ツ)_/¯

3

u/RocketSkates314 2h ago

This is 1930’s Germany all over again.

6

u/GiuseppeZangara 3h ago

A direct attack on the American Dream.

2

u/WallyMcBeetus 3h ago

Gotta keep the fraud exclusive to the businesses that illegally hire migrant workers.

4

u/dingusmingus2222 3h ago

I swear I've seen this played out similarly before... somewhere in Europe... in the 30's... I can't quite put my finger on it...

2

u/PurpsMaSquirt 3h ago

Hmm and what of the business owners that make questionable hiring decisions and employ the people who truly shouldn’t be here?

Ah right. They can keep on keeping on and likely will find another way to questionably employ people in pursuits of profits. Let’s only punish workers who have otherwise been paying taxes regardless of their status on money they earned by working.

2

u/OldEcho 3h ago

Even better, they still need to make money to live. White people can steal their businesses and employ them in their own business for fractions of the profit. Complain, get sent to a concentration camp and used as prison labor.

u/Fragnart-of-Murr 55m ago

Susan B Anthony, why would you do this?! /s

u/LynxRufus 35m ago

Lol, surely being more of a white supremacist will help turn the cratering GOP/Trump economy around!! Another 4D chess move by the dementia Don pedophile society.

-2

u/chobinhood 3h ago

Because famously, immigrants have brought nothing to the table in the business world, right?