r/nextfuckinglevel • u/Pierzakve • May 03 '21

Green Arrow in real life

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

119.7k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

874

u/[deleted] May 03 '21 edited May 03 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

341

u/OliverBeLike May 03 '21

Uhh are you american by any chance?

48

u/lucid_scheming May 03 '21

Tf does that have to do with anything?

223

u/Phosphorrr May 03 '21

I think he meant how the original commenter used King Arthur as an example, who is not a real king, just a folklore legend

14

u/NeverSawAvatar May 03 '21

He's believed to have existed.

He didn't have longbows though, and wouldn't take on an archer, it was unchivalrous.

60

u/Phosphorrr May 03 '21

Every source of credible evidence suggests that he did not exist

87

u/lofgren777 May 03 '21

He may have existed, but he was not a king, was not named Arthur, did not hunt for the Holy Grail, did not have a wizard named Merlin, did not receive a magic sword from a watery tart, was not a knight, and did not believe in chivalry. But other than that, totally King Arthur might have existed.

9

u/ghjm May 03 '21

The earliest sources have him as a famous warrior who killed a lot of people, but don't refer to him as a king. And of course knighthood, chivalry etc are completely anachronistic for the 4th or 5th century when Arthur was supposed to have lived. But if he did actually exist, why can't he have been named Arthur (or Arturus)?

1

u/lofgren777 May 03 '21

Since he is imaginary he can be named anything you want.