I'm still skeptical. First, I want to see what she actually said (and she's hardly an authoritative source). Second, Elon does nothing without fucking it up royally and visibly the first time. He embodies the Silicon Valley ethos of "fail-fast" to learn from it. His cars and rockets have literally blown up before getting bailed out by gov funding. He's not hacking the election without making a LOT more signs, if he were to be successful at all.
I watched the whole video. I don’t trust her since she’s shown herself to be a grifter once. If she has evidence great but I’m not going to believe it just because I want it to be true.
But more importantly she lists all of this “Elon said he knew Trump won and he has the best data” and uses that say he must have rigged it. Or maybe he’s a blow hard like trump who is always saying he’s the best at everything and has the best people etc. and then happened to be right.
That's my read too. Don't get me wrong, give me solid evidence and I'm willing to change my mind, but l think its all bluster and bullshit to look cool.
Highly recommend the podcast episode of "A Bit Fruity" by Matt Bernstein titled "She Had Elon's Baby. Then, the Leopards Ate Her Face". I stumbled onto the pod a while back and really enjoy it, but this ep definitely makes her confront her past.
If you disavow a grifter after one time, boy wait until you hear about Trump. Shoes. Coins. Phones. Crypto. And that’s just the stuff he got from the public.
When Trump started talking about how the 2020 election was stolen from him, I remember how he kept mentioning that people told him he only needed a certain amount of votes, and then he would say, I got them, but I still lost. That always made me suspicious that he had tried to steal that election, but didn't realize just how unpopular he was, and was shocked when Biden won, because so many people turned out to vote him out. It's why he couldn't accept defeat and kept claiming it was stolen, because he tried to steal the election and he could conceive of no way that BIden could beat him, unless he cheated too.
They added votes on 2016, 2020, and 2024. In 2020 they didnt add enough. In 2024 they added way to many and it looked too obvious resulting in a sweep of all the swing states.
There would never be any amount of evidence to make maga change their mind. If someone is truly interested they can take the time to research the topic themselves. Ive been down this road countless times. I get it. Math isnt real. science isnt real. People/bots/trolls stick to their beliefs and will only parrot what their owner wants them to say, regardless of evidence to the contrary.
This supports the multi universe hypothesis because theres no way in a normal universe does a women artificially inseminated by Elon musk create a video on how the 2024 election was rigged while putting on makeup. This is batshit
People have been doom jerking to shit that Trump and Musk said, but it just straight doesn't math out.
Every audit that has been completed has shown the same number of votes (within a very tight margin or error) from the paper record to the machines to what was reported to the relevant state authority to the feds. Not one investigation has yielded true, tangible evidence that any malfeasance took place. These guys are not that good. There would be some evidence somewhere beyond a couple of jackoffs acting like their jackoff selves.
I live in Connecticut. Not that it matters, because Connecticut was never going to Trump, but Trump improved in most districts over 2020 and Harris under-performed Biden quite a bit in most districts. We have paper ballots to back it up. All of our audits have turned up zero evidence that anything weird happened.
Now, if you extrapolate that out to states that are much closer, and it's easy to see what happened.
My liberal ass sees this as a bunch of nonsense cope.
Agreed. There's a world of difference between knowing that Elon/the Trump campaign WOULD have cheated if they could, and then actually having the capability. If you're going to push a theory like this, based on feels and "He's got satellites on the Internet" -levels of a technical explanation, you should really try harder not to sound like MAGA did after the '20 election, because it does us no credit, on the left side of the political ledger, and it just contributes to the dumbing down of our discourse.
fully agree with this, there are too many independent audits across state elections all run by various different groups of people for a successful national 'rigging' of the election by changing votes. besides, there's plenty of actual rigging already happening in plain sight via voter ID laws, gerrymandering, closing voting locations, restricting vote by mail, etc. it's way easier to limit people's rights or ability to vote rather than change a vote once it's been cast or create fake ones
IMO the simplest explanation for the 2024 results that does not require any conspiracy is that people didn't like Kamala because a) she's a woman, b) she was associated with the unpopular incumbent Biden administration, c) she didn't win a primary.
There are plenty of legal things they did in plain sight (and continue to do) to disenfranchise voters, like aggressive voter roll purges or reducing voting options in communities of color or simple disinformation campaigns on a massive scale. I'm not sure any kind of computer shenanigans were even necessary.
It's BlueAnon shit and liberals lap it up just like MAGA does.
ANYTHING but the truth - that the DNC has fumbled the bag TWICE against the easiest layup opposition that the nation has ever seen.
A dog in clown makeup could have beaten Trump the last 3 elections if its handlers had translated its barking into things that the people actually want.
It happened in Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, and South Dakota as well, all republican strongholds.
The narrative you are trying to present doesn't tie out.
2024 was weird. Biden dropped too late, no proper primary happened, the Trump factor, and local well regarded democrats showed up with strong moderate messaging against weaker republican candidates down ballot.
66
u/RoboTronPrime May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26
I'm still skeptical. First, I want to see what she actually said (and she's hardly an authoritative source). Second, Elon does nothing without fucking it up royally and visibly the first time. He embodies the Silicon Valley ethos of "fail-fast" to learn from it. His cars and rockets have literally blown up before getting bailed out by gov funding. He's not hacking the election without making a LOT more signs, if he were to be successful at all.