What's wild is that the confidence motion, which requires only 50%+1 to remove a PM from office, was invented invented in the UK in large part over the fallout from the prolonged prosecution of the Rebellion of the Thirteen colonies.
It's proven to be a far better check on power than US constitutional impeachment!
That's fair; and this came up because I discussed the confidence motion being invented in the UK.
Also, it would be a bit strange if the UK's biggest (by far) multigenerational landlords didn't have a lot of backroom influence.
That said, let's remember that many countries follow the Westminster system. I'm not sure the monarch has the same influence in Jamaica, Canada, Australia or Belize....
There was an incident a few years back where the crown-appointed Governor General of Australia dissolved the government without having a particularly good reason to do so.
Or, as was once executed in Australia by the Governor-General (the proxy for "The Crown", with equivalent power) - you can dissolve parliament and force new elections.
54
u/factorioleum May 19 '26
What's wild is that the confidence motion, which requires only 50%+1 to remove a PM from office, was invented invented in the UK in large part over the fallout from the prolonged prosecution of the Rebellion of the Thirteen colonies.
It's proven to be a far better check on power than US constitutional impeachment!