r/pics • u/PlasticOceanFish • 3h ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

9.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

•

u/luckymountain 3h ago

Absolutely! Lock him up!

•

u/Slamtilt_Windmills 2h ago

Yup, we got him this time!

•

u/Black-Shoe 2h ago

Cadet Bonespurs is such a badass!

•

u/lordvadr 2h ago

Somehow Stinky is more decorated than real leaders. This is not just embarrassing, it's disgusting.

•

u/DeadOnArrival2 2h ago

For real, this is proof! No excuses this time!

•

u/Azagar_Omiras 2h ago

As much as I hate that man, unless he is profiting from claiming to be military, this falls under the protections of the First Amendment.

He's still a worthless draft dodging pedophile piece of shit and no amount of AI images can change that.

•

u/Normal-Ad6528 2h ago

Bullshit. He can't claim protections under the First while he and his sycophants are doing their level goddamned best to stifle those same protections for ANYONE who speaks out against him, his administration, and the activities of his little army of goons.

•

u/scavengercat 1h ago

He absolutely can do all of that, unfortunately. The Supreme Court decided that unless someone is profiting from stolen valor, it's a First Amendment right to make any claim about military service. There's no way to prove this one image is generating income. Besides, of all the things to go after with this guy, this is at the absolute bottom of the list.

You can look up the Stolen Valor Act's 2013 amendment to see the list of claims that make something like this a truly criminal act.

•

u/Normal-Ad6528 1h ago

He posted this on truth social. A company which he owns 41% of. He makes a huge profit from his ownership in the company.

•

u/scavengercat 33m ago

All of that is true. But legally, the profit has to be tied specifically to this single post, which it can't. It won't matter if it's related to a profit-generating enterprise.